Editorial: A “Decade for Action” on SDG Localisation

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Human Development and Capabilities Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/19452829.2021.1986809
M. Biggeri
{"title":"Editorial: A “Decade for Action” on SDG Localisation","authors":"M. Biggeri","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2021.1986809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2019, the UN Secretary-General called for a “Decade for Action” to ensure that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) become fully operational. This is now the primary challenge for academicians and policymakers alike. The 2030 Agenda represents a universal and overarching roadmap for achieving sustainable development from a multidimensional perspective. During the last two years, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated various problems within our economies and societies (Anand et al. 2020), disrupting our capacity to overcome the unsustainability of modern production and consumption patterns and making the call to “leave no one behind” even more pronounced. Fulfilling the transformative potential of the 2030 Agenda requires a participatory, whole-of-government approach for its implementation, which is in line with the Sustainable Human Development paradigm and its pillars of equity, sustainability, productivity and participation. In other words, it is now more urgent than ever to translate the integrated and indivisible vision of sustainable development underlying the 2030 Agenda, its SDGs and the relative targets into supranational, national and local strategies and policy initiatives. Real action to accelerate sustainable solutions to the world’s biggest challenges (e.g. public health, poverty, gender, climate change and inequality) occurs not only at the global level but also, and especially, at the country and local levels. Indeed, the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development requires an innovative multilevel governance approach that goes beyond the traditional scope of the nation state in favour of a vertical alignment between the various levels of governance (i.e. international, national, regional and local) and horizontal engagement between public, private and social actors, with a view of driving policy coherence towards a common vision (Smoke and Nixon 2016). It is, therefore, essential to avoid the traditional “top-down” versus “bottomup” dichotomy, given the continuous interaction of resources, skills, knowledge and initiatives between levels and sectors. The sustainability transition, in particular, requires a complementary perspective based on the role of local and","PeriodicalId":46538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","volume":"22 1","pages":"706 - 712"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2021.1986809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In September 2019, the UN Secretary-General called for a “Decade for Action” to ensure that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) become fully operational. This is now the primary challenge for academicians and policymakers alike. The 2030 Agenda represents a universal and overarching roadmap for achieving sustainable development from a multidimensional perspective. During the last two years, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated various problems within our economies and societies (Anand et al. 2020), disrupting our capacity to overcome the unsustainability of modern production and consumption patterns and making the call to “leave no one behind” even more pronounced. Fulfilling the transformative potential of the 2030 Agenda requires a participatory, whole-of-government approach for its implementation, which is in line with the Sustainable Human Development paradigm and its pillars of equity, sustainability, productivity and participation. In other words, it is now more urgent than ever to translate the integrated and indivisible vision of sustainable development underlying the 2030 Agenda, its SDGs and the relative targets into supranational, national and local strategies and policy initiatives. Real action to accelerate sustainable solutions to the world’s biggest challenges (e.g. public health, poverty, gender, climate change and inequality) occurs not only at the global level but also, and especially, at the country and local levels. Indeed, the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development requires an innovative multilevel governance approach that goes beyond the traditional scope of the nation state in favour of a vertical alignment between the various levels of governance (i.e. international, national, regional and local) and horizontal engagement between public, private and social actors, with a view of driving policy coherence towards a common vision (Smoke and Nixon 2016). It is, therefore, essential to avoid the traditional “top-down” versus “bottomup” dichotomy, given the continuous interaction of resources, skills, knowledge and initiatives between levels and sectors. The sustainability transition, in particular, requires a complementary perspective based on the role of local and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:可持续发展目标本地化的“十年行动”
2019年9月,联合国秘书长呼吁建立“行动十年”,以确保《2030年可持续发展议程》和17项可持续发展目标全面实施。这是目前学者和决策者面临的主要挑战。《2030年议程》代表了从多层面实现可持续发展的普遍和总体路线图。在过去两年中,新冠肺炎疫情加剧了我们经济和社会中的各种问题(Anand等人,2020),破坏了我们克服现代生产和消费模式不可持续性的能力,并使“不让任何人掉队”的呼吁更加明显。实现《2030年议程》的变革潜力需要一种参与性的、全政府的方法来实施,这符合可持续人类发展模式及其公平、可持续、生产力和参与的支柱。换言之,现在比以往任何时候都更迫切地需要将《2030年议程》及其可持续发展目标和相关目标所依据的可持续发展的综合和不可分割的愿景转化为超国家、国家和地方的战略和政策举措。加快可持续解决世界最大挑战(如公共卫生、贫困、性别、气候变化和不平等)的实际行动不仅发生在全球层面,而且尤其发生在国家和地方层面。事实上,《2030年可持续发展议程》的实施需要一种创新的多层次治理方法,这种方法超越了民族国家的传统范围,有利于各级治理(即国际、国家、区域和地方)之间的纵向协调,以及公共、私营和社会行为者之间的横向参与,以期推动政策一致性实现共同愿景(Smoke和Nixon,2016)。因此,鉴于各级和部门之间资源、技能、知识和举措的持续互动,必须避免传统的“自上而下”与“自下而上”的二分法。可持续性转型尤其需要基于地方和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development is the peer-reviewed journal of the Human Development and Capabilities Association. It was launched in January 2000 to promote new perspectives on challenges of human development, capability expansion, poverty eradication, social justice and human rights. The Journal aims to stimulate innovative development thinking that is based on the premise that development is fundamentally about improving the well-being and agency of people, by expanding the choices and opportunities they have. Accordingly, the Journal recognizes that development is about more than just economic growth and development policy is more than just economic policy: it cuts across economic, social, political and environmental issues. The Journal publishes original work in philosophy, economics, and other social sciences that expand concepts, measurement tools and policy alternatives for human development. It provides a forum for an open exchange of ideas among a broad spectrum of academics, policy makers and development practitioners who are interested in confronting the challenges of human development at global, national and local levels.
期刊最新文献
The Capabilities Divide: ICT Adoption and Use among Bedouin in Israel How is the Capability Approach Applied to Assess Well-being Impacts? A Systematic Review The right to higher education: a political theory Implementing Inequality: The Invisible Labour of International Development Message from the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1