Review of Relational Psychoanalysis and Temporality: Time Out of Mind

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2022.2041312
M. Spieler
{"title":"Review of Relational Psychoanalysis and Temporality: Time Out of Mind","authors":"M. Spieler","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2022.2041312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time is at the heart of the psychoanalytic project. Indeed, as psychoanalysis evolved from a weeks or months-long, symptomatic treatment to a years or decades-long effort to heal the sequelae of devastations, deprivations, and traumas of patients’ formative years, questions of temporality have increasingly come to be seen as a critical dimension of that work. Increasingly, attending to the centrality of time in human experience has become deeply embedded in a psychoanalytic approach. Drawing on his long career of clinical work and rich clinical writing, Neil Skolnick has published a book that weaves together a series of articles on relational psychoanalysis that are bound together by his attentiveness to temporality. The book tracks both Skolnick’s evolution as an analyst and the transformation of psychoanalysis itself during and following the relational turn. Skolnick has served as a faculty member in the Relational Track since its inception at the NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, and like many of his contemporaries, the relational sensibility is part of his analytic DNA. As he makes clear in the book, Skolnick was both shaped by and an active participant in a movement that rejected the prevailing paradigm of Freudian ego psychology. Many of the older articles in the book capture the zeitgeist of a psychoanalytic era in which the relational school, far from being the dominant theoretical perspective that it is today (at least in the United States), was a radical and revolutionary departure from analytic practice and theorizing during a period Freudian hegemony. In fact, Skolnick recounts being chastised by a group of young analytic","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"58 1","pages":"156 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2041312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time is at the heart of the psychoanalytic project. Indeed, as psychoanalysis evolved from a weeks or months-long, symptomatic treatment to a years or decades-long effort to heal the sequelae of devastations, deprivations, and traumas of patients’ formative years, questions of temporality have increasingly come to be seen as a critical dimension of that work. Increasingly, attending to the centrality of time in human experience has become deeply embedded in a psychoanalytic approach. Drawing on his long career of clinical work and rich clinical writing, Neil Skolnick has published a book that weaves together a series of articles on relational psychoanalysis that are bound together by his attentiveness to temporality. The book tracks both Skolnick’s evolution as an analyst and the transformation of psychoanalysis itself during and following the relational turn. Skolnick has served as a faculty member in the Relational Track since its inception at the NYU Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, and like many of his contemporaries, the relational sensibility is part of his analytic DNA. As he makes clear in the book, Skolnick was both shaped by and an active participant in a movement that rejected the prevailing paradigm of Freudian ego psychology. Many of the older articles in the book capture the zeitgeist of a psychoanalytic era in which the relational school, far from being the dominant theoretical perspective that it is today (at least in the United States), was a radical and revolutionary departure from analytic practice and theorizing during a period Freudian hegemony. In fact, Skolnick recounts being chastised by a group of young analytic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系心理分析与暂时性研究综述:《头脑之外的时间》
时间是精神分析项目的核心。事实上,随着精神分析从长达数周或数月的症状治疗发展到长达数年或数十年的努力来治愈患者成长期的毁灭性、剥夺性和创伤的后遗症,时间性问题越来越被视为这项工作的一个关键方面。越来越多地,关注时间在人类经验中的中心地位已经深深植根于精神分析方法中。Neil Skolnick凭借其漫长的临床工作生涯和丰富的临床写作,出版了一本书,将一系列关于关系精神分析的文章编织在一起,这些文章因其对时间性的关注而联系在一起。这本书追踪了斯科尔尼克作为一名分析师的演变,以及在关系转向期间和之后精神分析本身的转变。Skolnick自纽约大学心理治疗和心理分析博士后项目成立以来,一直担任关系轨道的教员。和他的许多同时代人一样,关系敏感性是他分析DNA的一部分。正如他在书中明确指出的那样,斯科尔尼克既是由一场拒绝弗洛伊德自我心理学主流范式的运动塑造的,也是这场运动的积极参与者。书中许多较老的文章捕捉到了精神分析时代的时代精神,在这个时代,关系学派远不是今天(至少在美国)的主导理论视角,而是对弗洛伊德霸权时期的分析实践和理论的彻底和革命性的背离。事实上,Skolnick讲述了被一群年轻的分析人士惩罚的经历
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
What Happens When We Talk to Each Other: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Race and Other Difficult Conversations A Fresh Beginning to an Old Conversation: Thoughts on Leon Hoffman’s “We Don’t Trust YOU: Reflections on Anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis” Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places: Hatred as a Conflict Between Dependency and the Pseudo-Autonomous Self Surviving Hating and Being Hated On “Othering”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1