Multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting sustainable private partners for housing projects

Abdullah Abdullah, Adel Alshibani
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting sustainable private partners for housing projects","authors":"Abdullah Abdullah, Adel Alshibani","doi":"10.1108/JFMPC-07-2020-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to develop a framework for the selection of private partners in the housing industry of Saudi Arabia under the scheme of the partnership between the public and private sectors.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBy investigating criteria from a comprehensive literature review and experts input through surveys, developing further surveys incorporating decision-making methods: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) to construct a framework for selection based on weightages and utilities.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results identified criteria categorized under four categories: financial (C1), technical (C2), managerial (C3) and safety/environment (C4) and their sub-criteria. The study found that the main criteria were relatively close to each other in importance based on the subjective input of the experts with the technical and safety/environment criteria tying equally with 27% followed by the managerial with 24% and trailed by the financial with 22%.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study and surveys were conducted for the Saudi market and the experts were within the country.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study contributes to the Saudi housing initiative which is a part of the 2030 Vision and provides insight to international investors who would be willing to invest in the Saudi market; and to the literature as there is a notable lack of study on public-private partnership in housing in Saudi Arabia.\n","PeriodicalId":45720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-07-2020-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to develop a framework for the selection of private partners in the housing industry of Saudi Arabia under the scheme of the partnership between the public and private sectors. Design/methodology/approach By investigating criteria from a comprehensive literature review and experts input through surveys, developing further surveys incorporating decision-making methods: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) to construct a framework for selection based on weightages and utilities. Findings The results identified criteria categorized under four categories: financial (C1), technical (C2), managerial (C3) and safety/environment (C4) and their sub-criteria. The study found that the main criteria were relatively close to each other in importance based on the subjective input of the experts with the technical and safety/environment criteria tying equally with 27% followed by the managerial with 24% and trailed by the financial with 22%. Research limitations/implications The study and surveys were conducted for the Saudi market and the experts were within the country. Originality/value The study contributes to the Saudi housing initiative which is a part of the 2030 Vision and provides insight to international investors who would be willing to invest in the Saudi market; and to the literature as there is a notable lack of study on public-private partnership in housing in Saudi Arabia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为住房项目选择可持续私人合作伙伴的多标准决策框架
目的本文旨在根据公共和私营部门之间的伙伴关系计划,为沙特阿拉伯住房行业的私人合作伙伴的选择制定一个框架。设计/方法论/方法通过调查综合文献综述中的标准和专家通过调查的输入,结合决策方法:层次分析法(AHP)和多属性效用理论(MAUT),开发进一步的调查,以构建基于权重和效用的选择框架。结果确定了四类标准:财务(C1)、技术(C2)、管理(C3)和安全/环境(C4)及其子标准。研究发现,根据专家的主观投入,主要标准的重要性相对接近,技术和安全/环境标准平均为27%,其次是管理标准,为24%,其次是财务标准,为22%。研究局限性/含义研究和调查针对沙特市场进行,专家在国内。原创性/价值该研究有助于沙特住房倡议,该倡议是2030年愿景的一部分,并为愿意投资沙特市场的国际投资者提供见解;以及文献,因为沙特阿拉伯明显缺乏关于住房领域公私合作的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Managing supply chain disruptions in the construction industry: an institutional approach Assessing risk allocation preferences of partners in international construction joint venture projects in Ghana Impact of time-based delay on public-private partnership (PPP) construction project delivery: construction stakeholders’ perspective Drivers for the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) for post-construction management in the Nigerian AECO industry Risk assessment for 3D printing in construction projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1