Methodologies of sexual health education intervention for high school students' knowledge and attitudes: A systematic review

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Nursing Practice Today Pub Date : 2023-06-03 DOI:10.18502/npt.v10i2.12830
Germano Couto, Isabel de Jesus Oliveira, C. Fernandes, K. Mark
{"title":"Methodologies of sexual health education intervention for high school students' knowledge and attitudes: A systematic review","authors":"Germano Couto, Isabel de Jesus Oliveira, C. Fernandes, K. Mark","doi":"10.18502/npt.v10i2.12830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: Providing adolescents with information to understand their sexual health is critical to promote healthy sexual development, reducing the negative consequences of risky sexual behaviors, and creating a foundation for healthy adulthood. This study aimed to identify the recent empirical evidence on new methodologies for improved sexual health outcomes among adolescents. \nMethods & Materials: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials guided the PICO question, \"What knowledge and attitudes do high school students obtain when confronted with new methodologies for teaching sexuality compared to traditional teaching?\" regardless of geographic location, race/ethnicity, or gender criteria, concerning adolescents, was conducted. The databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched in December 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews were used to assess methodological quality. Data were synthesized across studies and presented narratively. \nResults: Thirteen articles were included for review, involving 11.262 participants. The duration of the interventions with new methodologies ranged from a few hours to three months. New methodologies on sexual health education to improve high school student's knowledge and attitudes were divided into four types: digital and Internet-based intervention, curriculum-based intervention, training-based intervention, and peer group bonding-based intervention. \nConclusion: These results provide healthcare professionals with additional strategies that may be integrated into school health programs regarding sex education.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i2.12830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aim: Providing adolescents with information to understand their sexual health is critical to promote healthy sexual development, reducing the negative consequences of risky sexual behaviors, and creating a foundation for healthy adulthood. This study aimed to identify the recent empirical evidence on new methodologies for improved sexual health outcomes among adolescents. Methods & Materials: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials guided the PICO question, "What knowledge and attitudes do high school students obtain when confronted with new methodologies for teaching sexuality compared to traditional teaching?" regardless of geographic location, race/ethnicity, or gender criteria, concerning adolescents, was conducted. The databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched in December 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews were used to assess methodological quality. Data were synthesized across studies and presented narratively. Results: Thirteen articles were included for review, involving 11.262 participants. The duration of the interventions with new methodologies ranged from a few hours to three months. New methodologies on sexual health education to improve high school student's knowledge and attitudes were divided into four types: digital and Internet-based intervention, curriculum-based intervention, training-based intervention, and peer group bonding-based intervention. Conclusion: These results provide healthcare professionals with additional strategies that may be integrated into school health programs regarding sex education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高中生性健康教育知识与态度干预的方法综述
背景与目的:为青少年提供了解其性健康的信息,对于促进健康的性发展、减少危险性行为的负面后果以及为健康成年奠定基础至关重要。这项研究旨在确定关于改善青少年性健康结果的新方法的最新经验证据。方法与材料:对随机对照试验的系统回顾指导了PICO的问题,“与传统教学相比,高中生在面对新的性教学方法时获得了什么知识和态度?”。2022年12月检索了CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、SCOPUS和Cochrane对照试验中央注册数据库。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所用于JBI系统评价的关键评估工具用于评估方法质量。数据在研究中进行了综合,并以叙述的方式呈现。结果:13篇文章被纳入审查,涉及11.262名参与者。采用新方法进行干预的时间从几个小时到三个月不等。旨在提高高中生知识和态度的性健康教育新方法分为四类:基于数字和互联网的干预、基于课程的干预、以培训为基础的干预和基于同伴群体纽带的干预。结论:这些结果为医疗保健专业人员提供了额外的策略,可以纳入学校关于性教育的健康计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional capacity and its associated factors in older adults in the rural area in Brazil Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study Fear of COVID-19, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia among undergraduate nursing students in Oman The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study A thematic analysis of professionalism from the perspective of nurse managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1