Comments on Revisiting Complementarity between Japanese FDI and the Import of Intermediate Goods: Agglomeration Effects and Parent-firm Heterogeneity

IF 5.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Asian Economic Papers Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1162/asep_a_00790
Deborah L. Swenson
{"title":"Comments on Revisiting Complementarity between Japanese FDI and the Import of Intermediate Goods: Agglomeration Effects and Parent-firm Heterogeneity","authors":"Deborah L. Swenson","doi":"10.1162/asep_a_00790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By tracking the detailed product-level trade transactions for 929 Japanese affiliates in China, Ito, Matsuura, and Yang contribute to the classic literature that investigates the complementarity versus sub-stitutability of trade and FDI. To advance this question, the paper studies the duration of intermediate input imports by these Chinese affiliates between 2000 and 2006. Because the authors have taken on the arduous task of creating a data set that combines four different sources, they illuminate a number of interesting relationships that are generally obscured by firm efforts to hide their proprietary actions from view. The key question posed by this paper is: How is the duration of intermediate input import by Chinese affiliates shaped by product, firm-level, and national considerations? Thanks to the paper’s careful data effort, much of the paper’s novelty lies in its ability to relate this question to the Japanese parent firms’ characteristics and global footprints. Most notably, the paper shows that the duration of affiliate import of intermediate inputs was shorter when the Japanese parent firm was larger (as measured by employment), had a larger global network of affiliates, or had longer experience operating as a multinational. Although this inquiry piques the reader’s interest in this question, however, the generaliz-ability of the results are called into question by the uniqueness of the period of estimation, 2000–06, which lies solidly in the interval of China’s accession to the WTO and coincides with the period of rapid hollowing out of Japan’s manufacturing sector. 1 In this context, for Japanese industries relocating to China, the main question was sequencing. Firms could move everything at once, or start assembly early on, using imported inputs that were later replaced by new suppliers. To the extent that Japan’s affiliates in China were initiating operations that were replacing their predecessor operations in Japan, the duration analysis reveals the product trades that were most quickly relocated. Intuitively, the paper shows","PeriodicalId":52020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Papers","volume":"19 1","pages":"107-108"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By tracking the detailed product-level trade transactions for 929 Japanese affiliates in China, Ito, Matsuura, and Yang contribute to the classic literature that investigates the complementarity versus sub-stitutability of trade and FDI. To advance this question, the paper studies the duration of intermediate input imports by these Chinese affiliates between 2000 and 2006. Because the authors have taken on the arduous task of creating a data set that combines four different sources, they illuminate a number of interesting relationships that are generally obscured by firm efforts to hide their proprietary actions from view. The key question posed by this paper is: How is the duration of intermediate input import by Chinese affiliates shaped by product, firm-level, and national considerations? Thanks to the paper’s careful data effort, much of the paper’s novelty lies in its ability to relate this question to the Japanese parent firms’ characteristics and global footprints. Most notably, the paper shows that the duration of affiliate import of intermediate inputs was shorter when the Japanese parent firm was larger (as measured by employment), had a larger global network of affiliates, or had longer experience operating as a multinational. Although this inquiry piques the reader’s interest in this question, however, the generaliz-ability of the results are called into question by the uniqueness of the period of estimation, 2000–06, which lies solidly in the interval of China’s accession to the WTO and coincides with the period of rapid hollowing out of Japan’s manufacturing sector. 1 In this context, for Japanese industries relocating to China, the main question was sequencing. Firms could move everything at once, or start assembly early on, using imported inputs that were later replaced by new suppliers. To the extent that Japan’s affiliates in China were initiating operations that were replacing their predecessor operations in Japan, the duration analysis reveals the product trades that were most quickly relocated. Intuitively, the paper shows
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本FDI与中间产品进口互补性研究述评:集聚效应与母公司异质性
通过追踪929家日本在华子公司的详细产品级贸易交易,Ito、Matsuura和Yang为研究贸易和外国直接投资的互补性与可替代性的经典文献做出了贡献。为了推进这一问题,本文研究了这些中国子公司在2000年至2006年间进口中间投入品的持续时间。由于作者承担了创建一个包含四个不同来源的数据集的艰巨任务,因此他们阐明了许多有趣的关系,这些关系通常被公司隐藏其专有行为的努力所掩盖。本文提出的关键问题是:中国子公司进口中间投入的持续时间如何受到产品、企业层面和国家因素的影响?多亏了这篇论文对数据的细致整理,这篇论文的新颖之处在于它将这个问题与日本母公司的特点和全球足迹联系起来的能力。最值得注意的是,本文表明,当日本母公司规模较大(以就业为衡量标准)、拥有较大的全球子公司网络或拥有较长的跨国经营经验时,中间投入的子公司进口持续时间较短。尽管这一调查激起了读者对这一问题的兴趣,然而,由于2000 - 2006年这一估计时期的独特性,结果的普遍性受到了质疑,这一时期正好处于中国加入世贸组织的时期,与日本制造业迅速空心化的时期相吻合。在这种背景下,对于日本产业迁移到中国来说,主要问题是排序。公司可以一次把所有的东西都搬出去,或者提前开始组装,使用进口的原料,然后由新的供应商取代。在某种程度上,日本在中国的子公司正在开展业务,以取代其在日本的前身业务,持续时间分析揭示了最迅速迁移的产品交易。直观地,论文表明
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The journal Asian Economic Papers (AEP) is supported by several prominent institutions, including the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University in the United States. This shows that there is a strong emphasis on sustainable development within the journal's scope. Additionally, the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy in South Korea, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) in Malaysia, and the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia in Indonesia also sponsor AEP. The articles published in AEP focus on conducting thorough and rigorous analyses of significant economic issues pertaining to specific Asian economies or the broader Asian region. The aim is to gain a deeper understanding of these issues and provide innovative solutions. By offering creative solutions to economic challenges, AEP contributes to the discourse and policymaking that impact the Asian economies and region as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Trade-war Tariffs and Supply Chain Trade Resilience of Japanese Multinational Enterprise Production Networks during the COVID-19 Pandemic Exploring the Impact of China's Internal Circulation Strategy on its Stock Market under Deglobalization Comments by Masahiro Endoh,  on  Change from COVID-19 Pandemic to a New Normal: Documenting Consumption Behavior of  Two Years with Big Data Comments by Nam Seok Kim,  on The Untimely Demise of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Malaysia: A Postmortem and the Way Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1