Simulated herbicide spray retention of commonly managed invasive emergent aquatic macrophytes

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Weed Technology Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1017/wet.2023.26
Erika J. Haug, A. Howell, Benjamin P. Sperry, C. Mudge, R. Richardson, K. Getsinger
{"title":"Simulated herbicide spray retention of commonly managed invasive emergent aquatic macrophytes","authors":"Erika J. Haug, A. Howell, Benjamin P. Sperry, C. Mudge, R. Richardson, K. Getsinger","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO2-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Nomenclature: Alligatorweed; Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.; cattail; Typha latifolia L.; creeping water primrose; Ludwigia grandiflora (Michx.) Greuter & Burdet; parrotfeather; Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.; torpedograss Panicum repens L.; water hyacinth; Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":"37 1","pages":"243 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Invasive emergent and floating macrophytes can have detrimental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Management of these aquatic weeds frequently relies upon foliar application of aquatic herbicides. However, there is inherent variability of overspray (herbicide loss) for foliar applications into waters within and adjacent to the targeted treatment area. The spray retention (tracer dye captured) of four invasive broadleaf emergent species (water hyacinth, alligatorweed, creeping water primrose, and parrotfeather) and two emergent grass-like weeds (cattail and torpedograss) were evaluated. For all species, spray retention was simulated using foliar applications of rhodamine WT (RWT) dye as a herbicide surrogate under controlled mesocosm conditions. Spray retention of the broadleaf species was first evaluated using a CO2-pressurized spray chamber overtop dense vegetation growth or no plants (positive control) at a greenhouse (GH) scale. Broadleaf species and grass-like species were then evaluated in larger outdoor mesocosms (OM). These applications were made using a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. Evaluation metrics included species-wise canopy cover and height influence on in-water RWT concentration using image analysis and modeling techniques. Results indicated spray retention was greatest for water hyacinth (GH, 64.7 ± 7.4; OM, 76.1 ± 3.8). Spray retention values were similar among the three sprawling marginal species alligatorweed (GH, 37.5 ± 4.5; OM, 42 ± 5.7), creeping water primrose (GH, 54.9 ± 7.2; OM, 52.7 ± 5.7), and parrotfeather (GH, 48.2 ± 2.3; OM, 47.2 ± 3.5). Canopy cover and height were strongly correlated with spray retention for broadleaf species and less strongly correlated for grass-like species. Although torpedograss and cattail were similar in percent foliar coverage, they differed in percent spray retention (OM, 8.5± 2.3 and 28.9 ±4.1, respectively). The upright leaf architecture of the grass-like species likely influenced the lower spray retention values in comparison to the broadleaf species. Nomenclature: Alligatorweed; Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.; cattail; Typha latifolia L.; creeping water primrose; Ludwigia grandiflora (Michx.) Greuter & Burdet; parrotfeather; Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc.; torpedograss Panicum repens L.; water hyacinth; Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟常用管理的入侵突生水生大型植物的除草剂喷洒滞留
摘要入侵的新兴和漂浮大型植物会对水生生态系统造成不利影响。这些水生杂草的管理往往依赖于叶面施用水生除草剂。然而,叶面施用的过度喷洒(除草剂损失)在目标处理区域内和邻近水域存在固有的可变性。对4种入侵阔叶应急物种(水信子、短吻鳄草、爬行水报春花和鹦鹉毛)和2种应急草样杂草(香蒲和水雷草)的喷雾滞留(示踪剂捕获)进行了评价。在控制的中环境条件下,通过叶面施用罗丹明WT (RWT)染料作为除草剂替代品,模拟了所有物种的喷雾滞留。在温室(GH)尺度下,首先利用co2加压喷雾室对阔叶植物的喷雾滞留进行了评估,该喷雾室覆盖了茂密的植被生长或没有植物(阳性对照)。然后在较大的室外中生态系统(OM)中对阔叶种和类草种进行了评价。这些应用是使用二氧化碳加压背包喷雾器进行的。利用图像分析和建模技术,评估指标包括物种的冠层覆盖度和高度对水中RWT浓度的影响。结果水葫芦喷雾滞留量最大(GH, 64.7±7.4;(76.1±3.8)。3个蔓延边缘种短吻鳄草的喷雾滞留值相似(GH, 37.5±4.5;OM, 42±5.7),匍匐水报春花(GH, 54.9±7.2;OM, 52.7±5.7),鹦鹉羽毛(GH, 48.2±2.3;(47.2±3.5)。阔叶植物的冠层盖度和高度与喷雾滞留量的相关性较强,类草植物的相关性较弱。水雷草和香蒲的叶盖度相近,但其滞留率不同(分别为8.5±2.3和28.9±4.1)。与阔叶植物相比,类草植物直立的叶片结构可能影响了较低的喷雾滞留值。术语:Alligatorweed;互花草(Mart.)Griseb。香蒲;风铃草;匍匐水报春花;桔梗(桔梗)格鲁特&伯德;parrotfeather;水生肉豆蔻(浅孔)Verdc。水雷草;水葫芦;马蹄莲(马蹄莲)索姆斯
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
期刊最新文献
Target site mechanism confers resistance pattern of ACCase-inhibitors in bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fusca ssp. fascicularis) from California Response of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) to reduced risk synthetic and nonsynthetic herbicides applied post-transplant Glyphosate-resistant and susceptible downy brome (Bromus tectorum) management with soil-applied residual herbicides Integrating Cover Crops and Herbicides for Weed Control in Soybean Effect of herbicide programs on control and seed production of multiple herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in corn resistant to 2,4-D/glufosinate/glyphosate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1