The validity and reliability of the Korean version of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale for nursing students

Y. Seo, Jung-Won Ahn
{"title":"The validity and reliability of the Korean version of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale for nursing students","authors":"Y. Seo, Jung-Won Ahn","doi":"10.5977/jkasne.2022.28.4.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS-K) for nursing students.Methods: Data from 235 participants were collected from April 12 to April 26, 2022. A total of 230 participants’ data were analyzed. The data were analyzed for content, discriminant, known-groups, and construct validity using content validity index, correlation coefficient, and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability of the GAAIS-K was examined using internal consistency and test-retest analyses.Results: The expert-rated content validity index was ≥.80. The sub-scales of the GAAIS-K were moderately correlated with attitude toward accepting technology, indicative of its discriminant validity. The male students’ positive attitude score was significantly higher than that of the female students, satisfying the known-groups validity. Cronbach’s α for the scale was .86 (positive) and .74 (negative), and the intra-class correlation coefficient for the two-week test-retest reliability was .86 (positive) and .60 (negative). The scores for positive and negative attitudes were 3.68±0.46 and 3.05±0.55.Conclusion: This study shows that the GAAIS-K is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nursing students. Additional research is recommended to continue the evaluation of the GAAIS-K with a focus on healthcare settings.","PeriodicalId":36262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2022.28.4.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS-K) for nursing students.Methods: Data from 235 participants were collected from April 12 to April 26, 2022. A total of 230 participants’ data were analyzed. The data were analyzed for content, discriminant, known-groups, and construct validity using content validity index, correlation coefficient, and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability of the GAAIS-K was examined using internal consistency and test-retest analyses.Results: The expert-rated content validity index was ≥.80. The sub-scales of the GAAIS-K were moderately correlated with attitude toward accepting technology, indicative of its discriminant validity. The male students’ positive attitude score was significantly higher than that of the female students, satisfying the known-groups validity. Cronbach’s α for the scale was .86 (positive) and .74 (negative), and the intra-class correlation coefficient for the two-week test-retest reliability was .86 (positive) and .60 (negative). The scores for positive and negative attitudes were 3.68±0.46 and 3.05±0.55.Conclusion: This study shows that the GAAIS-K is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nursing students. Additional research is recommended to continue the evaluation of the GAAIS-K with a focus on healthcare settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国版护生对人工智能总体态度量表的信度和有效性
目的:本研究旨在验证韩国版护理学生对人工智能的总体态度量表(GAAIS-K)的有效性和可靠性。方法:收集2022年4月12日至4月26日期间235名参与者的数据。共分析了230名参与者的数据。使用内容有效性指数、相关系数和验证性因素分析对数据的内容、判别式、已知组和结构有效性进行分析。GAAIS-K的可靠性通过内部一致性和测试再测试分析进行了检验。结果:专家评定的内容有效性指数≥0.80。GAAIS-K的子量表与接受技术的态度适度相关,表明其判别有效性。男生的积极态度得分显著高于女生,满足已知组的有效性。该量表的Cronbachα分别为.86(阳性)和.74(阴性),两周重测信度的类内相关系数分别为.88(阳性)与.60(阴性)。积极态度和消极态度的得分分别为3.68±0.46和3.05±0.55。建议进行更多研究,继续评估GAAIS-K,重点关注医疗环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Factors related to the organizational silence of Korean nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis Factors affecting senior nursing students’ willingness to palliative care Development of a case-based nursing education program using generative artificial intelligence The mediating effect of grit and social support on the relationship between self-determination and life satisfaction in nursing students Predictors of parental behavioral intentions for vaccinating their children against COVID-19 as determined by the modified theory of planned behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1