Children and Families' mental health during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Italy

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2021-08-08 DOI:10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-2984
L. Ferraro, C. Cascia, M. Daino, G. Tripoli, G. Maniaci, Crocettarachele Santorio, F. Seminerio, R. Baido, D. Barbera
{"title":"Children and Families' mental health during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Italy","authors":"L. Ferraro, C. Cascia, M. Daino, G. Tripoli, G. Maniaci, Crocettarachele Santorio, F. Seminerio, R. Baido, D. Barbera","doi":"10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-2984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to screen a wide range of emotional and behavioural variables emerging during the first COVID-19 pandemic-lockdown in a sample of parents and children, residents in the southern part of Italy, and explore which variables could predict children’s wellbeing. We hypothesised that difficulties in adapting routines to pandemic restrictions, parents’ emotional wellbeing, and attitude towards the pandemic could influence the children’s behavioural attitudes. Methods: 221 parents completed the survey and gave information about 246 children. Ad hoc questionnaires were created and then exploratory reduced in factors.  Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)  for parents assessed positive and negative behavioural attitudes in children.  Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (Italian DASS-21) scored depression, anxiety and stress in parents. Results: Children presented higher emotional distress (Mean difference (M diff )=0.6, 95% C.I. 0.2, 0.9, p=0.013) and better prosocial behaviour (M diff =0.5, 95% C.I. 0.1, 0.9, p=0.011) than the Italian normative sample. Parents were more depressed than expected in the general population (M diff =1.0, 95% C.I. 0.3, 1.6, p=0.005). Having developed a morbid attachment to an adult (B=0.37, 95% CI 0.05, 0.69, p=0.024), a higher parental depression (B=0.1, 95% CI 0.02, 0.18, p=0.014), and children’s suffering from nightmares (B=0.35, 95% CI 0.03, 0.67, p=0.032) explained the 31.9% of the total variance in children’s emotional distress. Children’s anxiety was related to parents’ fear of the pandemic effects (r=0.32, p=0.001) and avoiding communicative approach (r=0.24, p=0.011). Conclusion:  The first lockdown determined emotional distress and regressive mechanisms in children in the contest of higher parental discomfort, fear of the infection and avoidant communication. Following parents’ indications, it could be helpful to provide families with informative and age-appropriate support.","PeriodicalId":18428,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-2984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to screen a wide range of emotional and behavioural variables emerging during the first COVID-19 pandemic-lockdown in a sample of parents and children, residents in the southern part of Italy, and explore which variables could predict children’s wellbeing. We hypothesised that difficulties in adapting routines to pandemic restrictions, parents’ emotional wellbeing, and attitude towards the pandemic could influence the children’s behavioural attitudes. Methods: 221 parents completed the survey and gave information about 246 children. Ad hoc questionnaires were created and then exploratory reduced in factors.  Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)  for parents assessed positive and negative behavioural attitudes in children.  Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (Italian DASS-21) scored depression, anxiety and stress in parents. Results: Children presented higher emotional distress (Mean difference (M diff )=0.6, 95% C.I. 0.2, 0.9, p=0.013) and better prosocial behaviour (M diff =0.5, 95% C.I. 0.1, 0.9, p=0.011) than the Italian normative sample. Parents were more depressed than expected in the general population (M diff =1.0, 95% C.I. 0.3, 1.6, p=0.005). Having developed a morbid attachment to an adult (B=0.37, 95% CI 0.05, 0.69, p=0.024), a higher parental depression (B=0.1, 95% CI 0.02, 0.18, p=0.014), and children’s suffering from nightmares (B=0.35, 95% CI 0.03, 0.67, p=0.032) explained the 31.9% of the total variance in children’s emotional distress. Children’s anxiety was related to parents’ fear of the pandemic effects (r=0.32, p=0.001) and avoiding communicative approach (r=0.24, p=0.011). Conclusion:  The first lockdown determined emotional distress and regressive mechanisms in children in the contest of higher parental discomfort, fear of the infection and avoidant communication. Following parents’ indications, it could be helpful to provide families with informative and age-appropriate support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利首次COVID-19封锁期间儿童和家庭的心理健康
背景:这项研究旨在从意大利南部的父母和儿童、居民样本中筛选第一次新冠肺炎大封锁期间出现的各种情绪和行为变量,并探索哪些变量可以预测儿童的健康状况。我们假设,在适应疫情限制、父母的情绪健康和对疫情的态度方面的困难可能会影响孩子的行为态度。方法:221名家长完成调查,提供246名儿童的相关信息。创建了临时问卷,然后探索性地减少因素。针对父母的优势和困难问卷(SDQ)评估了儿童的积极和消极行为态度。抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(意大利DAS-21)对父母的抑郁、焦虑和压力进行评分。结果:与意大利标准样本相比,儿童表现出更高的情绪困扰(平均差异(M diff)=0.6,95%CI 0.2,0.9,p=0.013)和更好的亲社会行为(M diff=0.5,95%CI 0.1,0.9,p=0.011)。在普通人群中,父母比预期的更抑郁(M diff=1.0,95%CI 0.3,1.6,p=0.005)。对成年人产生病态依恋(B=0.37,95%CI 0.05,0.69,p=0.024)后,父母抑郁程度更高(B=0.1,95%CI 0.02,0.18,p=0.014),儿童遭受噩梦的痛苦(B=0.35,95%CI 0.03,0.67,p=0.032)解释了儿童情绪困扰总方差的31.9%。儿童的焦虑与父母对疫情影响的恐惧(r=0.32,p=0.001)和回避沟通方式(r=0.24,p=0.011)有关。结论:第一次封锁决定了儿童在父母更高的不适感、对感染的恐惧和回避沟通的竞争中的情绪困扰和倒退机制。根据父母的指示,为家庭提供信息和适龄的支持可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
53.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The MJCP is an Open Access Peer-Reviewed International Journal in Clinical Psychology. MJCP accepts research related to innovative and important areas of clinical research: 1. Clinical studies related to Clinical Psychology, 2. Psychopathology and Psychotherapy; 3. Basic studies pertaining to clinical psychology field as experimental psychology, psychoneuroendocrinology and psychoanalysis; 4. Growing application of clinical techniques in clinical psychology, psychology of health, clinical approaches in projective methods; 5. Forensic psychology in clinical research; 6. Psychology of art and religion; 7. Advanced in basic and clinical research methodology including qualitative and quantitative research and new research findings.
期刊最新文献
Adult Attachment, Loneliness, Covid-19 Risk Perception and Perceived Stress During Covid-19 Pandemic XXII NATIONAL CONGRESS ITALIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION CLINICAL AND DYNAMIC SECTION LECCE -SEPTEMBER 17-19 2021 - SYMPOSIUM SESSION Why do we call it addiction? Epistemological reflections on the world of addiction Social support and its associations with Depression and Anxiety: an in-depth Analysis using Structural Equation Modeling Using Prediction Error to Account for the Pervasiveness of Mood Congruent Thoughts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1