Adam Plowman, P. Jedrasiak, T. Jailin, Peter Crowther, Sumeet R. Mishra, P. Shanthraj, J. Quinta da Fonseca
{"title":"A novel integrated framework for reproducible formability predictions using virtual materials testing","authors":"Adam Plowman, P. Jedrasiak, T. Jailin, Peter Crowther, Sumeet R. Mishra, P. Shanthraj, J. Quinta da Fonseca","doi":"10.12688/materialsopenres.17516.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Formed aluminium alloy sheet materials are increasingly adopted in production processes such as vehicle manufacturing, due to the potential for weight-saving and improved recyclability when compared to more traditional steel alloys. To maximise these benefits whilst maintaining sufficient mechanical properties, the link between formability and microstructure must be better understood. Virtual materials testing is a cost-effective strategy for generating microstructure-informed formability predictions. Methods: We developed an open-source hybrid framework, combining experimental and computational tasks, for generating reproducible formability predictions. Starting with experimental texture measurements and stress-strain curves, we calibrated crystal plasticity (CP) model parameters. The framework used these parameters to perform a large set of multiaxial full-field CP simulations, from which various anisotropic yield functions were fitted. With these anisotropy parameters, we then employed a Marciniak-Kuczynski finite-element model to predict forming limit curves, which we compared with those from experimental Nakazima tests. Results: We executed the workflow with the aluminium alloy Surfalex HF (AA6016A) as a case study material. The 18-parameter Barlat yield function provided the best fit, compared to six-parameter functions. Predicted forming limits depended strongly on the chosen hardening law, and good agreement with the experimental forming limit curve was found. All of the generated data have been uploaded to the Zenodo repository. A set of Jupyter notebooks to allow interactive inspection of our methods and data are also available. Conclusions: We demonstrated a robust methodology for replicable virtual materials testing, which enables cheaper and faster formability analyses. This complete workflow is encoded within a simple yet highly customisable computational pipeline that can be applied to any material. To maximise reproducibility, our approach takes care to ensure our methods and data — and the ways in which that data is processed — are unambiguously defined during all steps of the workflow.","PeriodicalId":29806,"journal":{"name":"Materials Open Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/materialsopenres.17516.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Formed aluminium alloy sheet materials are increasingly adopted in production processes such as vehicle manufacturing, due to the potential for weight-saving and improved recyclability when compared to more traditional steel alloys. To maximise these benefits whilst maintaining sufficient mechanical properties, the link between formability and microstructure must be better understood. Virtual materials testing is a cost-effective strategy for generating microstructure-informed formability predictions. Methods: We developed an open-source hybrid framework, combining experimental and computational tasks, for generating reproducible formability predictions. Starting with experimental texture measurements and stress-strain curves, we calibrated crystal plasticity (CP) model parameters. The framework used these parameters to perform a large set of multiaxial full-field CP simulations, from which various anisotropic yield functions were fitted. With these anisotropy parameters, we then employed a Marciniak-Kuczynski finite-element model to predict forming limit curves, which we compared with those from experimental Nakazima tests. Results: We executed the workflow with the aluminium alloy Surfalex HF (AA6016A) as a case study material. The 18-parameter Barlat yield function provided the best fit, compared to six-parameter functions. Predicted forming limits depended strongly on the chosen hardening law, and good agreement with the experimental forming limit curve was found. All of the generated data have been uploaded to the Zenodo repository. A set of Jupyter notebooks to allow interactive inspection of our methods and data are also available. Conclusions: We demonstrated a robust methodology for replicable virtual materials testing, which enables cheaper and faster formability analyses. This complete workflow is encoded within a simple yet highly customisable computational pipeline that can be applied to any material. To maximise reproducibility, our approach takes care to ensure our methods and data — and the ways in which that data is processed — are unambiguously defined during all steps of the workflow.
期刊介绍:
Materials Open Research is a rapid open access publishing platform for a broad range of materials science research. The platform welcomes theoretical, experimental, and modelling approaches on the properties, characterization, design, structure, classification, processing, and performance of materials, and their applications. The platform is open to submissions from researchers, practitioners and experts, and all articles will benefit from open peer review.
Materials research underpins many significant and novel technologies which are set to revolutionize our society, and Materials Open Research is well-suited to ensure fast and full access to this research for the benefit of the academic community, industry, and beyond.
The platform aims to create a forum for discussion and for the dissemination of research in all areas of materials science and engineering. This includes, but is not limited to, research on the following material classes:
● Biomaterials and biomedical materials
● Composites
● Economic minerals
● Electronic materials
● Glasses & ceramics
● Magnetic materials
● Metals & alloys
● Nanomaterials and nanostructures
● Polymers
● Porous materials
● Quantum materials
● Smart materials
● Soft matter
● Structural materials
● Superconducting materials
● Thin films
Materials Open Research also focuses on a range of applications and approaches within materials science, including but not limited to:
● Additive manufacturing
● Computational materials & modelling
● Materials in energy & the environment
● Materials informatics
● Materials synthesis and processing
In addition to original Research Articles, Materials Open Research will feature a variety of article types including Method Articles, Study Protocols, Software Tool Articles, Systematic Reviews, Data Notes, Brief Reports, and Opinion Articles. All research is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we accept confirmatory and replication studies, as well as negative and null results.
Materials Open Research is an Open Research Platform. All articles are published open access under a CC-BY license and authors benefit from fully transparent publishing and peer review processes. Where applicable, authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and will receive editorial guidance on making all underlying data openly available in order to improve reproducibility. The platform will also provide the option to publish non-peer reviewed materials including technical reports, training materials, posters, slides, and other documents.