{"title":"Top cited articles in concussion: A bibliometric analysis of the state of the science","authors":"Bhanu Sharma, D. W. Lawrence","doi":"10.1177/20597002221086095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Citation analyses identify the most-cited publications in a given field, which aids in understanding areas of the literature that are well-developed and those where additional research is required. Our objective was to perform a citation analysis in concussion to understand the state of the science from a bibliometric perspective. Design We performed a keyword search for articles related to concussion in Harzing's Publish or Perish, which scrapes Google Scholar for citation metrics. This approach was used to identify the 50 articles with the most lifetime citations as well as the 50 articles with the highest citation rate. Main outcome measures Citations and citation rates. Results Per our citation analysis, we found that concussion guidelines are among the most cited publications (comprising ≥20% of each citation cohort), yet there is a dearth of widely cited clinical trials to inform them; only one randomized trial (studying the effects of rest following concussion) was included in our citation analysis. The majority of study designs (≥40% of each citation cohort) were cross-sectional. Concussion recovery and secondary complications of concussion were common study topics, with ≥20% of publications in each citation cohort focused on these issues. The publications included in our analysis were authored by 596 authors from only 12 countries, suggesting a lack of global representation in concussion research. Conclusions Existing reviews and consensus statements have called for additional, high-quality research in concussion; our citation analysis quantifies this need. Further, although concussion is a global problem with its incidence and burden increasing in the developing world, our citation analysis demonstrates that the most-cited and discussed articles in concussion are published by authors from only 12 countries. Going forward, to address the global problem that is concussion, a more global research perspective is called for.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002221086095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective Citation analyses identify the most-cited publications in a given field, which aids in understanding areas of the literature that are well-developed and those where additional research is required. Our objective was to perform a citation analysis in concussion to understand the state of the science from a bibliometric perspective. Design We performed a keyword search for articles related to concussion in Harzing's Publish or Perish, which scrapes Google Scholar for citation metrics. This approach was used to identify the 50 articles with the most lifetime citations as well as the 50 articles with the highest citation rate. Main outcome measures Citations and citation rates. Results Per our citation analysis, we found that concussion guidelines are among the most cited publications (comprising ≥20% of each citation cohort), yet there is a dearth of widely cited clinical trials to inform them; only one randomized trial (studying the effects of rest following concussion) was included in our citation analysis. The majority of study designs (≥40% of each citation cohort) were cross-sectional. Concussion recovery and secondary complications of concussion were common study topics, with ≥20% of publications in each citation cohort focused on these issues. The publications included in our analysis were authored by 596 authors from only 12 countries, suggesting a lack of global representation in concussion research. Conclusions Existing reviews and consensus statements have called for additional, high-quality research in concussion; our citation analysis quantifies this need. Further, although concussion is a global problem with its incidence and burden increasing in the developing world, our citation analysis demonstrates that the most-cited and discussed articles in concussion are published by authors from only 12 countries. Going forward, to address the global problem that is concussion, a more global research perspective is called for.
目标引文分析确定了特定领域中被引用最多的出版物,这有助于理解文献中发展完善的领域和需要额外研究的领域。我们的目的是对脑震荡进行引文分析,从文献计量学的角度了解科学的现状。设计我们在Harzing的Publish or Perish中对与脑震荡相关的文章进行了关键词搜索,该搜索从谷歌学者那里搜索引文指标。该方法用于识别终身引用次数最多的50篇文章以及引用率最高的50篇论文。主要结果衡量引文和引文率。结果根据我们的引文分析,我们发现脑震荡指南是被引用最多的出版物之一(占每个引文队列的≥20%),但缺乏被广泛引用的临床试验来为其提供信息;只有一项随机试验(研究脑震荡后休息的影响)被纳入我们的引文分析。大多数研究设计(每个引用队列的≥40%)是横断面的。脑震荡的恢复和继发性脑震荡并发症是常见的研究主题,每个引用队列中≥20%的出版物关注这些问题。我们分析中的出版物由来自12个国家的596位作者撰写,这表明脑震荡研究缺乏全球代表性。结论现有的综述和共识声明要求对脑震荡进行额外的高质量研究;我们的引文分析量化了这种需求。此外,尽管脑震荡是一个全球性问题,其发生率和负担在发展中国家不断增加,但我们的引文分析表明,脑震荡中被引用和讨论最多的文章是由来自12个国家的作者发表的。展望未来,为了解决脑震荡这一全球性问题,需要一个更全球化的研究视角。