Using third-party evaluations to assess socioemotional skills in graduate and professional school admissions

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748
David Klieger, Jennifer L. Bochenek, Chelsea Ezzo, Steven Holtzman, Frederick Cline, Margarita Olivera-Aguilar
{"title":"Using third-party evaluations to assess socioemotional skills in graduate and professional school admissions","authors":"David Klieger, Jennifer L. Bochenek, Chelsea Ezzo, Steven Holtzman, Frederick Cline, Margarita Olivera-Aguilar","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Consideration of socioemotional skills in admissions potentially can increase representation of racial and ethnic minorities and women in graduate and professional education as well as identify candidates more likely to succeed in graduate and professional school. Research on one such assessment, the ETS Personal Potential Index (PPI), showed that the PPI produced much smaller racial/ethnic-gender group mean score differences than undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) did. Across levels of institutional selectivity, the PPI can promote racial/ethnic and gender diversity in graduate and professional school in ways that UGPA and GRE scores do not. Predictive validity analyses showed that for doctoral STEM programs the PPI dimensions of (1) Planning and Organization and (2) Communication Skills positively predict school grade point average as well as a lower risk of academic probation, a determinant of degree progress, both alone and incrementally over UGPA and GRE scores. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748 .","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":"22 1","pages":"72 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Consideration of socioemotional skills in admissions potentially can increase representation of racial and ethnic minorities and women in graduate and professional education as well as identify candidates more likely to succeed in graduate and professional school. Research on one such assessment, the ETS Personal Potential Index (PPI), showed that the PPI produced much smaller racial/ethnic-gender group mean score differences than undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) did. Across levels of institutional selectivity, the PPI can promote racial/ethnic and gender diversity in graduate and professional school in ways that UGPA and GRE scores do not. Predictive validity analyses showed that for doctoral STEM programs the PPI dimensions of (1) Planning and Organization and (2) Communication Skills positively predict school grade point average as well as a lower risk of academic probation, a determinant of degree progress, both alone and incrementally over UGPA and GRE scores. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用第三方评估来评估研究生和专业学校招生中的社会情感技能
摘要在招生中考虑社会情感技能可能会增加少数民族和妇女在研究生和专业教育中的代表性,并确定更有可能在研究生院和专业学校取得成功的候选人。对其中一项评估——ETS个人潜力指数(PPI)的研究表明,PPI产生的种族/民族性别组平均分差异比本科生平均分(UGPA)和研究生入学考试(GRE)小得多。在不同的机构选择性水平上,PPI可以促进研究生院和专业学校的种族/民族和性别多样性,而UGPA和GRE成绩则不然。预测有效性分析表明,对于博士STEM项目,PPI维度(1)规划与组织和(2)沟通技能正向预测学校平均绩点,以及较低的学业试用风险,这是学位进步的决定因素,无论是单独还是逐步超过UGPA和GRE成绩。本文的补充数据可在线获取,网址为https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2021.2019748。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures Can the dark core of personality be measured briefly, multidimensionally, and invariantly? The D25 measure Investigating the acquiescent responding impact in empathy measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1