Feasibility, efficacy and safety of PFO closure under local anesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography microprobe: A single-center study of 383 patients

S. Lagrange, B. Mouhat, M. Besutti, O. Zbitou, R. Chopard, N. Meneveau
{"title":"Feasibility, efficacy and safety of PFO closure under local anesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography microprobe: A single-center study of 383 patients","authors":"S. Lagrange,&nbsp;B. Mouhat,&nbsp;M. Besutti,&nbsp;O. Zbitou,&nbsp;R. Chopard,&nbsp;N. Meneveau","doi":"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.04.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is usually performed under </span>general anesthesia<span><span> (GA) with guidance by transesophageal echocardiograpy (TEE). Microrobe makes this procedure possible under local anesthesia (LA). Our study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of PFO closure under LA with </span>microprobe guidance.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>The aim was to evaluate the rate of PFO closure failure in patients who underwent a procedure under LA with a TEE microprobe (micro-LA group) vs. under GA with a conventional probe (conventional-GA group). The primary endpoint was the persistence of inter-atrial shunt (&gt;</span> <!-->10 microbubbles) 6 months after procedure, screened by contrast transthoracic ultrasound. The secondary objectives were: identification of risk markers for the persistence of inter-atrial shunt at 6 months, post-procedure complication rates and major cardiovascular events rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred and eighty three patients were included: 303 (79%) in the conventional-GA group, 79 (21%) in the micro-AL group. The median follow-up was 28.0 (14.0–49.0) months. The average age was 49.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12.6 years, 61.9% of men. There was no failure of PFO closure under AL. Six months after PFO closure, there was no difference in persistence of inter-atrial shunt between the conventional-GA group and the micro-AL group (29.3% vs. 25.5%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.583). There was no difference in the occurrence of complications related to the procedure between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the presence of interatrial septal aneurysm [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.07–3.31), </span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.029], ROPE score<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->6 [OR 1.22 (1.04–1.43), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.015] and the occurrence of stroke following the procedure [OR 4.48 (1.12–17.87), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.034] were independently associated with the presence of a residual inter-atrial shunt at 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study identified that PFO closure under LA with TEE microprobe is feasible and safe. There was no difference in efficacy of 6-month FOP closure, regardless of conventional-GA or micro-AL method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8140,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023001684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) with guidance by transesophageal echocardiograpy (TEE). Microrobe makes this procedure possible under local anesthesia (LA). Our study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of PFO closure under LA with microprobe guidance.

Method

The aim was to evaluate the rate of PFO closure failure in patients who underwent a procedure under LA with a TEE microprobe (micro-LA group) vs. under GA with a conventional probe (conventional-GA group). The primary endpoint was the persistence of inter-atrial shunt (> 10 microbubbles) 6 months after procedure, screened by contrast transthoracic ultrasound. The secondary objectives were: identification of risk markers for the persistence of inter-atrial shunt at 6 months, post-procedure complication rates and major cardiovascular events rate.

Results

Three hundred and eighty three patients were included: 303 (79%) in the conventional-GA group, 79 (21%) in the micro-AL group. The median follow-up was 28.0 (14.0–49.0) months. The average age was 49.9 ± 12.6 years, 61.9% of men. There was no failure of PFO closure under AL. Six months after PFO closure, there was no difference in persistence of inter-atrial shunt between the conventional-GA group and the micro-AL group (29.3% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.583). There was no difference in the occurrence of complications related to the procedure between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the presence of interatrial septal aneurysm [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.07–3.31), P = 0.029], ROPE score > 6 [OR 1.22 (1.04–1.43), P = 0.015] and the occurrence of stroke following the procedure [OR 4.48 (1.12–17.87), P = 0.034] were independently associated with the presence of a residual inter-atrial shunt at 6 months.

Conclusion

Our study identified that PFO closure under LA with TEE microprobe is feasible and safe. There was no difference in efficacy of 6-month FOP closure, regardless of conventional-GA or micro-AL method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经食管超声心动图微探针局部麻醉下PFO封堵术的可行性、有效性和安全性:383例患者的单中心研究
经皮卵圆孔未闭(PFO)通常在全身麻醉(GA)下经食管超声心动图(TEE)指导下进行。在局部麻醉(LA)下,显微技术使这一过程成为可能。我们的研究旨在评估微探针引导下LA闭合PFO的可行性、有效性和安全性。目的是评估采用TEE微探针(micro-LA组)和采用常规探针(conventional-GA组)进行手术的患者PFO关闭失败率。主要终点是房内分流的持续存在(>10个微泡)术后6个月,经胸超声造影筛查。次要目标是:确定6个月时房内分流持续存在的危险标志,术后并发症发生率和主要心血管事件发生率。结果共纳入383例患者:常规- ga组303例(79%),微量- al组79例(21%)。中位随访时间为28.0(14.0 ~ 49.0)个月。平均年龄49.9±12.6岁,男性占61.9%。AL下无PFO关闭失败。PFO关闭6个月后,常规- ga组与micro-AL组的房间分流持续时间无差异(29.3% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.583)。两组手术并发症发生率无差异。在多因素分析中,房间隔动脉瘤的存在[OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.07-3.31), P = 0.029], ROPE评分>6 [OR 1.22 (1.04-1.43), P = 0.015]和手术后卒中的发生[OR 4.48 (1.12-17.87), P = 0.034]与6个月时残留心房分流的存在独立相关。结论TEE微探针在LA下闭合PFO是可行且安全的。无论是常规ga法还是显微al法,6个月FOP闭合的疗效均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
期刊介绍: Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements is the official journal of the French Society of Cardiology. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles, editorials, and Images in cardiovascular medicine. The topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Additionally, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Contents How to Report postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery? Review and analysis of the literature Surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, how to choose ? No coronary artery in the aorta: Severe congenital malformation under-diagnosed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1