Evaluation of Grazing Land Condition in Gozamen District, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia

A. Gashe, Awoke Kassa Zewdie
{"title":"Evaluation of Grazing Land Condition in Gozamen District, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia","authors":"A. Gashe, Awoke Kassa Zewdie","doi":"10.15226/2572-3162/3/2/00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in Gozamen district of East Gojam Zone of the Amhara region to assess the major feed resources, the grazing land condition, and the floristic composition and biomass yields of herbaceous species to generate baseline information which can be used for future management of grazing land resources in the area. The survey data was collected by interviewing a total of 120 households by random selection of two rural-kebeles from three altitudes [high, mid and low].To assess grazing land condition, the district was stratified into three altitudes [high, mid and low altitudes]. From each altitude, communal and enclosed grazing areas were selected randomly. From each altitude 8 composites and 12 composites from enclosed and 12 composites from communal grazing for herbaceous vegetation and 4 transects from each altitude of communal grazing were selected. Thus, a total of 72 quadrats were used for herbaceous and 12 transects for woody species. For the natural pasture condition assessment, analyses of variance [ANOVA] were carried out by the General Linear Model [GLM] procedure of SAS. Mean separation was tested using the least significant difference. The main feed resources to the livestock in all altitudes were natural pasture, crop residues and stubble grazing. During dry season, crop residues was the first livestock feed source followed by natural pasture in all altitudes. However, during wet season, natural pasture was the first livestock feed source followed by crop resides in all altitudes. In terms of dry matter [DM] crop residues contributed the highest proportion [66.7%] of the total feed sources. The DM obtained from crop residues significantly varied [P< 0.05] among the altitudes. The total annual estimated available feed supply to maintain the livestock in the area satisfied only 79.4%. The conservation of feed resources in the form of hay in high, mid and low altitudes was 38.5, 80, and 22.5%, respectively. But, none of the respondents used silage in the study area due to lack of knowledge how to make it. In the district, a total of 21 herbaceous species were identified [Table 4], from these 57, 24 and 19% were grasses, legumes and other species, respectively. Based on dry matter of biomass, Medicago polymorpha in high and mid altitudes and Eleusine floccifolia in low altitude were the dominant species. Altitude and grazing have effects on grazing land conditions and biomass production. The average dry matter yield of grasses, legumes and total biomass had a significant difference among altitudes in enclosed and communal grazing areas. The average dry matter yield of grasses, legumes, and total biomass were higher in enclosed area than communal grazing areas in all altitudes. There were a significant [P< 0.01] interaction of altitude and grazing on biomass and species composition. There were positive correlation of species composition, grass species composition and basal cover with biomass. Crop residues and natural pastures are the major feed resources in dry and wet seasons, respectively. The total annual dry matter does not meet the total livestock requirement per annum in district. Further research and development work is recommended to alleviate feed shortage through different options such as development of improved forages and alternative means of crop residue utilization and conservation of feed in the form hay and crop residues. Keywords: Altitudinal range; Botanical composition; Crop residues; Dry matter; Feed balance; Grazing land types; Natural pasture;","PeriodicalId":93649,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2572-3162/3/2/00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The study was conducted in Gozamen district of East Gojam Zone of the Amhara region to assess the major feed resources, the grazing land condition, and the floristic composition and biomass yields of herbaceous species to generate baseline information which can be used for future management of grazing land resources in the area. The survey data was collected by interviewing a total of 120 households by random selection of two rural-kebeles from three altitudes [high, mid and low].To assess grazing land condition, the district was stratified into three altitudes [high, mid and low altitudes]. From each altitude, communal and enclosed grazing areas were selected randomly. From each altitude 8 composites and 12 composites from enclosed and 12 composites from communal grazing for herbaceous vegetation and 4 transects from each altitude of communal grazing were selected. Thus, a total of 72 quadrats were used for herbaceous and 12 transects for woody species. For the natural pasture condition assessment, analyses of variance [ANOVA] were carried out by the General Linear Model [GLM] procedure of SAS. Mean separation was tested using the least significant difference. The main feed resources to the livestock in all altitudes were natural pasture, crop residues and stubble grazing. During dry season, crop residues was the first livestock feed source followed by natural pasture in all altitudes. However, during wet season, natural pasture was the first livestock feed source followed by crop resides in all altitudes. In terms of dry matter [DM] crop residues contributed the highest proportion [66.7%] of the total feed sources. The DM obtained from crop residues significantly varied [P< 0.05] among the altitudes. The total annual estimated available feed supply to maintain the livestock in the area satisfied only 79.4%. The conservation of feed resources in the form of hay in high, mid and low altitudes was 38.5, 80, and 22.5%, respectively. But, none of the respondents used silage in the study area due to lack of knowledge how to make it. In the district, a total of 21 herbaceous species were identified [Table 4], from these 57, 24 and 19% were grasses, legumes and other species, respectively. Based on dry matter of biomass, Medicago polymorpha in high and mid altitudes and Eleusine floccifolia in low altitude were the dominant species. Altitude and grazing have effects on grazing land conditions and biomass production. The average dry matter yield of grasses, legumes and total biomass had a significant difference among altitudes in enclosed and communal grazing areas. The average dry matter yield of grasses, legumes, and total biomass were higher in enclosed area than communal grazing areas in all altitudes. There were a significant [P< 0.01] interaction of altitude and grazing on biomass and species composition. There were positive correlation of species composition, grass species composition and basal cover with biomass. Crop residues and natural pastures are the major feed resources in dry and wet seasons, respectively. The total annual dry matter does not meet the total livestock requirement per annum in district. Further research and development work is recommended to alleviate feed shortage through different options such as development of improved forages and alternative means of crop residue utilization and conservation of feed in the form hay and crop residues. Keywords: Altitudinal range; Botanical composition; Crop residues; Dry matter; Feed balance; Grazing land types; Natural pasture;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉州东Gojjam区Gozamen区牧场状况评估
该研究在阿姆哈拉地区东戈贾姆区的戈扎门区进行,以评估主要饲料资源、牧场条件、草本物种的区系组成和生物量产量,从而生成可用于该地区未来牧场资源管理的基线信息。调查数据是通过从三个海拔高度[高、中、低]随机选择两个农村kebele,共采访120户家庭收集的。为了评估牧场状况,将该地区分为三个海拔[高、中和低]。从每个海拔高度随机选择公共和封闭的放牧区。从每个海拔高度选择了8个复合物和12个来自封闭的复合物,12个来自公共放牧的复合物和4个来自公共牧场的样带。因此,共有72个样方用于草本物种,12个样带用于木本物种。对于天然牧场状况评估,通过SAS的通用线性模型[GLM]程序进行方差分析。使用最小显著差异测试平均分离度。所有海拔地区牲畜的主要饲料资源是天然牧场、作物残留物和残茬放牧。在旱季,作物残留物是所有海拔高度的第一个牲畜饲料来源,其次是天然牧场。然而,在雨季,天然牧场是第一个牲畜饲料来源,其次是所有海拔地区的作物。就干物质而言,作物残留物在总饲料来源中所占比例最高[66.7%]。从作物残留物中获得的DM在不同海拔高度之间存在显著差异[P<0.05]。该地区每年估计可用于维持牲畜的饲料供应总量仅满足79.4%。高海拔、中海拔和低海拔干草形式的饲料资源保护率分别为38.5%、80%和22.5%。但是,由于不知道如何制作青贮饲料,没有一名受访者在研究区域使用青贮饲料。在该地区,共确定了21种草本物种[表4],其中57%、24%和19%分别为草、豆类和其他物种。从生物量干物质来看,高、中海拔地区的苜蓿和低海拔地区的小叶Eleusine是优势种。海拔高度和放牧对牧场条件和生物量生产有影响。在封闭和公共放牧区,草、豆类的平均干物质产量和总生物量在海拔高度之间存在显著差异。在所有海拔高度,封闭区的草、豆类的平均干物质产量和总生物量都高于公共放牧区。海拔和放牧对生物量和物种组成有显著的交互作用(P<0.01)。物种组成、草种组成和基底覆盖与生物量呈正相关。农作物秸秆和天然牧场分别是旱季和雨季的主要饲料资源。该地区每年的总干物质不符合每年的总牲畜需求。建议开展进一步的研究和开发工作,通过不同的选择来缓解饲料短缺,如开发改良的牧草和作物残留物利用的替代方法,以及保护干草和作物残留物形式的饲料。关键词:高程范围;植物成分;作物残留物;干物质;饲料平衡;牧场类型;天然牧场;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Variations in Duhok City and Semel District, Kurdistan Region of Iraq Bio treatment Strategies for the Removal of Phthalate Esters from Asa River using Chlorella vulgaris (MG257915) and Nannochloropsis sp (MG257918) as Biodegradation Tool Application of Mathematical Models for Predicting the Trihalomethanes Content in Drinking Water in the City of Struga, North Macedonia Quality Assessment and Recyclability of Plastic from Household Waste to Eco-Friendly Paver Block Assessing Landcover Change for the Management of Floral and Aquatic Ecosystem in Kalikiliki Area of Lusaka, Zambia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1