response token as an interactional resource for topic closing in Korean conversation

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS East Asian Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1558/eap.17828
Kyoungmi Ha
{"title":"response token as an interactional resource for topic closing in Korean conversation","authors":"Kyoungmi Ha","doi":"10.1558/eap.17828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the discourse and sequential roles of the response token kuleh-kwuna (‘I see’) in ordinary Korean conversation using the conversation analytic (CA) approach. Regarding closing sequences in English conversation, studies have shown less-abrupt ways of closing a topic by using figurative expressions, response tokens indicating shift-implicativeness and assessment (Beach, 1993; Drew & Holt, 1998; Goodwin & Goodwin,1992; Jefferson, 1984). In line with these studies on closing sequences, and furthering the previous studies of the sentence-ending suffix-kwuna, this article argues that Korean speakers often use the response token kuleh-kwuna as a resource to close a topic of conversation less abruptly. A speaker’s complete understanding of the received information and the implication of not needing further information indexed by kuleh-kwuna provide a suitable environment in which speakers can move on to the next sequence of a conversation.","PeriodicalId":37018,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.17828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the discourse and sequential roles of the response token kuleh-kwuna (‘I see’) in ordinary Korean conversation using the conversation analytic (CA) approach. Regarding closing sequences in English conversation, studies have shown less-abrupt ways of closing a topic by using figurative expressions, response tokens indicating shift-implicativeness and assessment (Beach, 1993; Drew & Holt, 1998; Goodwin & Goodwin,1992; Jefferson, 1984). In line with these studies on closing sequences, and furthering the previous studies of the sentence-ending suffix-kwuna, this article argues that Korean speakers often use the response token kuleh-kwuna as a resource to close a topic of conversation less abruptly. A speaker’s complete understanding of the received information and the implication of not needing further information indexed by kuleh-kwuna provide a suitable environment in which speakers can move on to the next sequence of a conversation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回应表征作为韩国语会话话题封闭的互动资源
本研究使用会话分析(CA)方法研究了韩语会话中应答符号kuleh-kwuna(“我看到了”)的话语和顺序角色。关于英语会话中的结束序列,研究表明,通过使用比喻性表达、表明转移-隐含性和评估的反应符号来结束话题的方式不那么突兀(Beach, 1993;德鲁和霍尔特,1998;Goodwin & Goodwin,1992;杰斐逊,1984)。本文结合上述关于结束序列的研究,并在对句尾后缀“kuleh-kwuna”的研究的基础上,认为韩语使用者经常使用应答符号“kuleh-kwuna”作为结束话题的一种资源。说话者对所接收信息的完全理解和不需要进一步信息的含义提供了一个合适的环境,在这个环境中说话者可以继续进行下一个对话序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Pragmatics
East Asian Pragmatics Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring disclaimers on Chinese social networking sites from a metapragmatic perspective Politeness of Chinese-Javanese cross-ethnic communication in the Javanese Cultural Area, Indonesia 'East Asian Pragmatics: Commonalities and Variations' Xinren Chen and Doreen Dongying Wu (Eds.) (2023) Don’t call me obasan ‘aunt’ Building interpersonal closeness in complaint responses in customer service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1