Navigating the Ruins of Pax Americana

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.3368/cl.62.1.125
A. J. Y. Lee
{"title":"Navigating the Ruins of Pax Americana","authors":"A. J. Y. Lee","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lthough the United States has been engaged in continuous, escalating military conflict around the globe since the Second World War, a mistaken view persists in the US of the post-1945 period as an era of relative world peace: our overseas military conflicts are depicted in mainstream discourses as minor and peripheral, prophylactic if not benevolent, reactive rather than aggressive, a means for maintaining world peace rather than violent interventions that generate new enemies. Meanwhile, in Americanist scholarship, studies of Cold War culture still tend to imaginatively center the white middle-class family amid a domestic atmosphere of prosperity fostered by this so-called “long peace.” Accordingly, the cultural productions we associate with the Cold War tend toward paranoia and kitsch, focusing on Americans’ (read: white Americans) feelings of existential dread evoked by the potential threat of nuclear weapons rather than acknowledging the real, horrific losses that the use and testing of these weapons inflicted on their racialized targets. That the post-1945 era marks the expansion of the US military into the largest and most destructive force in the world remains outside the main picture, something additional rather than foundational to US culture. A. J. Y U M I L E E","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"62 1","pages":"125 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.1.125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

lthough the United States has been engaged in continuous, escalating military conflict around the globe since the Second World War, a mistaken view persists in the US of the post-1945 period as an era of relative world peace: our overseas military conflicts are depicted in mainstream discourses as minor and peripheral, prophylactic if not benevolent, reactive rather than aggressive, a means for maintaining world peace rather than violent interventions that generate new enemies. Meanwhile, in Americanist scholarship, studies of Cold War culture still tend to imaginatively center the white middle-class family amid a domestic atmosphere of prosperity fostered by this so-called “long peace.” Accordingly, the cultural productions we associate with the Cold War tend toward paranoia and kitsch, focusing on Americans’ (read: white Americans) feelings of existential dread evoked by the potential threat of nuclear weapons rather than acknowledging the real, horrific losses that the use and testing of these weapons inflicted on their racialized targets. That the post-1945 era marks the expansion of the US military into the largest and most destructive force in the world remains outside the main picture, something additional rather than foundational to US culture. A. J. Y U M I L E E
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《美国治下和平的废墟
尽管自第二次世界大战以来,美国一直在全球范围内持续不断升级的军事冲突,但1945年后作为世界相对和平时代的美国仍然存在一种错误的观点:我们的海外军事冲突在主流话语中被描述为次要和边缘的、预防性的(如果不是仁慈的话)、反应性的而不是侵略性的,一种维护世界和平的手段,而不是产生新敌人的暴力干预。与此同时,在美国学术界,对冷战文化的研究仍然倾向于想象性地将白人中产阶级家庭置于这种所谓的“长期和平”所营造的繁荣氛围中。因此,我们与冷战联系在一起的文化作品往往倾向于偏执和媚俗,关注美国人(读作:美国白人)因核武器的潜在威胁而引发的生存恐惧感,而不是承认这些武器的使用和测试给他们的种族化目标造成的真实、可怕的损失。1945年后的时代标志着美国军队扩张为世界上最大、最具破坏性的力量,这一点仍然不在主要画面之外,这是美国文化的附加内容,而不是基础。A.J.Y U M I L E E
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. CL published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; we also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J.M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, CL features the full diversity of critical practices.
期刊最新文献
What Lyric Is Missing: Anne Carson and the Contemporary Fragment Sally Rooney’s Sapiosexuals Race by Analogy? Omar El Akkad’s American Wars The Banality of Exception My Mother, My Self: Coming of Age on the Road in Sara Taylor’sThe Lauras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1