Wearable IoT based diagnosis of prostate cancer using GLCM-multiclass SVM and SIFT-multiclass SVM feature extraction strategies

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications Pub Date : 2021-09-29 DOI:10.1108/ijpcc-07-2021-0167
Swetha Parvatha Reddy Chandrasekhara, M. Kabadi, Srivinay Srivinay
{"title":"Wearable IoT based diagnosis of prostate cancer using GLCM-multiclass SVM and SIFT-multiclass SVM feature extraction strategies","authors":"Swetha Parvatha Reddy Chandrasekhara, M. Kabadi, Srivinay Srivinay","doi":"10.1108/ijpcc-07-2021-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study has mainly aimed to compare and contrast two completely different image processing algorithms that are very adaptive for detecting prostate cancer using wearable Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Cancer in these modern times is still considered as one of the most dreaded disease, which is continuously pestering the mankind over a past few decades. According to Indian Council of Medical Research, India alone registers about 11.5 lakh cancer related cases every year and closely up to 8 lakh people die with cancer related issues each year. Earlier the incidence of prostate cancer was commonly seen in men aged above 60 years, but a recent study has revealed that this type of cancer has been on rise even in men between the age groups of 35 and 60 years as well. These findings make it even more necessary to prioritize the research on diagnosing the prostate cancer at an early stage, so that the patients can be cured and can lead a normal life.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research focuses on two types of feature extraction algorithms, namely, scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) that are commonly used in medical image processing, in an attempt to discover and improve the gap present in the potential detection of prostate cancer in medical IoT. Later the results obtained by these two strategies are classified separately using a machine learning based classification model called multi-class support vector machine (SVM). Owing to the advantage of better tissue discrimination and contrast resolution, magnetic resonance imaging images have been considered for this study. The classification results obtained for both the SIFT as well as GLCM methods are then compared to check, which feature extraction strategy provides the most accurate results for diagnosing the prostate cancer.\n\n\nFindings\nThe potential of both the models has been evaluated in terms of three aspects, namely, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Each model’s result was checked against diversified ranges of training and test data set. It was found that the SIFT-multiclass SVM model achieved a highest performance rate of 99.9451% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity at 40:60 ratio of the training and testing data set.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe SIFT-multi SVM versus GLCM-multi SVM based comparison has been introduced for the first time to perceive the best model to be used for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer. The performance of the classification for each of the feature extraction strategies is enumerated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.\n","PeriodicalId":43952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpcc-07-2021-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study has mainly aimed to compare and contrast two completely different image processing algorithms that are very adaptive for detecting prostate cancer using wearable Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Cancer in these modern times is still considered as one of the most dreaded disease, which is continuously pestering the mankind over a past few decades. According to Indian Council of Medical Research, India alone registers about 11.5 lakh cancer related cases every year and closely up to 8 lakh people die with cancer related issues each year. Earlier the incidence of prostate cancer was commonly seen in men aged above 60 years, but a recent study has revealed that this type of cancer has been on rise even in men between the age groups of 35 and 60 years as well. These findings make it even more necessary to prioritize the research on diagnosing the prostate cancer at an early stage, so that the patients can be cured and can lead a normal life. Design/methodology/approach The research focuses on two types of feature extraction algorithms, namely, scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) that are commonly used in medical image processing, in an attempt to discover and improve the gap present in the potential detection of prostate cancer in medical IoT. Later the results obtained by these two strategies are classified separately using a machine learning based classification model called multi-class support vector machine (SVM). Owing to the advantage of better tissue discrimination and contrast resolution, magnetic resonance imaging images have been considered for this study. The classification results obtained for both the SIFT as well as GLCM methods are then compared to check, which feature extraction strategy provides the most accurate results for diagnosing the prostate cancer. Findings The potential of both the models has been evaluated in terms of three aspects, namely, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Each model’s result was checked against diversified ranges of training and test data set. It was found that the SIFT-multiclass SVM model achieved a highest performance rate of 99.9451% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity at 40:60 ratio of the training and testing data set. Originality/value The SIFT-multi SVM versus GLCM-multi SVM based comparison has been introduced for the first time to perceive the best model to be used for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer. The performance of the classification for each of the feature extraction strategies is enumerated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可穿戴物联网的前列腺癌症诊断——基于GLCM多类SVM和SIFT多类SVM特征提取策略
本研究主要旨在比较和对比两种完全不同的图像处理算法,这两种算法对使用可穿戴物联网(IoT)设备检测前列腺癌具有很强的适应性。在现代,癌症仍然被认为是最可怕的疾病之一,在过去的几十年里,它一直困扰着人类。根据印度医学研究委员会的数据,仅印度每年就登记了大约115万例癌症相关病例,每年有近80万人死于癌症相关问题。早些时候,前列腺癌的发病率常见于60岁以上的男性,但最近的一项研究表明,即使在35岁至60岁的男性中,这种癌症的发病率也在上升。这些发现使我们更有必要优先研究前列腺癌的早期诊断,以便患者能够治愈并过上正常的生活。设计/方法/方法本研究主要针对医学图像处理中常用的两类特征提取算法,即尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)和灰度共生矩阵(GLCM),试图发现并改善医疗物联网中前列腺癌潜在检测存在的空白。然后使用基于机器学习的多类支持向量机(SVM)分类模型对这两种策略得到的结果分别进行分类。由于磁共振成像具有更好的组织识别和对比度分辨率的优势,因此本研究考虑了磁共振成像图像。然后将SIFT和GLCM两种方法的分类结果进行比较,检验哪种特征提取策略为前列腺癌的诊断提供了最准确的结果。从准确性、敏感性和特异性三个方面对两种模型的潜力进行了评价。每个模型的结果都是针对不同范围的训练和测试数据集进行检查的。结果发现,sift -多类SVM模型在训练和测试数据集的40:60比例下,准确率为99.9451%,灵敏度为100%,特异性为99%,性能最高。本文首次引入基于SIFT-multi SVM与GLCM-multi SVM的比较,以感知用于前列腺癌准确诊断的最佳模型。从准确性、灵敏度和特异性三个方面列举了每种特征提取策略的分类性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications
International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Big data challenges and opportunities in Internet of Vehicles: a systematic review Cooperative optimization techniques in distributed MAC protocols – a survey Novel communication system for buried water pipe monitoring using acoustic signal propagation along the pipe A new predictive approach for the MAC layer misbehavior in IEEE 802.11 networks Clustering based EO with MRF technique for effective load balancing in cloud computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1