The recognition of the sacred in theories of possible worlds: some hermeneutic orientations

Q1 Arts and Humanities Church, Communication and Culture Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23753234.2021.1961594
Álvaro Abellán-García Barrio, Arturo Encinas Cantalapiedra
{"title":"The recognition of the sacred in theories of possible worlds: some hermeneutic orientations","authors":"Álvaro Abellán-García Barrio, Arturo Encinas Cantalapiedra","doi":"10.1080/23753234.2021.1961594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses the question of the possibilities for the recognition of the sacred in theories of possible worlds, an area which has not been explicitly developed but that has important consequences based on each author’s underlying notion of “world”. The study will focus on three representatives of the logical-analytical current (Ryan, Albaladejo and Doležel) and on three other authors who take a phenomenological-existential approach (Eco, Pavel and García-Noblejas). Despite the systematic clarity of the model of analysis applied by the former authors, their fundamental understanding of reality may inhibit the identification of the sacred as “real”. Although the existential current is a priori more disposed to recognize the sacred, a more systematic approach in their analysis is required for the identification and thematization of the sacred. The present paper examines the theoretical presuppositions of each approach in recognizing the sacred within narrations, as an element in the salvation or perdition of fictional characters, which is essential for a full understanding of both the sapiential value of fiction and the meaning of many works of fiction. To conclude, the paper offers a series of observations to assist in the systematization of the study of the sacred in possible fictional worlds.","PeriodicalId":36858,"journal":{"name":"Church, Communication and Culture","volume":"6 1","pages":"175 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2021.1961594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses the question of the possibilities for the recognition of the sacred in theories of possible worlds, an area which has not been explicitly developed but that has important consequences based on each author’s underlying notion of “world”. The study will focus on three representatives of the logical-analytical current (Ryan, Albaladejo and Doležel) and on three other authors who take a phenomenological-existential approach (Eco, Pavel and García-Noblejas). Despite the systematic clarity of the model of analysis applied by the former authors, their fundamental understanding of reality may inhibit the identification of the sacred as “real”. Although the existential current is a priori more disposed to recognize the sacred, a more systematic approach in their analysis is required for the identification and thematization of the sacred. The present paper examines the theoretical presuppositions of each approach in recognizing the sacred within narrations, as an element in the salvation or perdition of fictional characters, which is essential for a full understanding of both the sapiential value of fiction and the meaning of many works of fiction. To conclude, the paper offers a series of observations to assist in the systematization of the study of the sacred in possible fictional worlds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可能世界理论中对神圣的承认:一些解释学取向
摘要本文探讨了在可能世界理论中承认神圣性的可能性问题,这一领域尚未明确发展,但基于每位作者的“世界”基本概念,它具有重要的后果。本研究将重点关注逻辑分析潮流的三位代表人物(Ryan、Albaladejo和Doležel)以及其他三位采取现象学存在主义方法的作者(Eco、Pavel和García-Noblejas)。尽管前几位作者所采用的分析模型系统清晰,但他们对现实的基本理解可能会阻碍将神圣的事物认定为“真实的”。尽管存在流先验地更倾向于承认神圣,但需要在其分析中采用更系统的方法来识别和主题化神圣。本文考察了每种方法在认识叙事中的神圣性方面的理论前提,这是拯救或毁灭虚构人物的一个因素,对于充分理解小说的智慧价值和许多小说作品的意义至关重要。最后,本文提供了一系列观察,以帮助系统化研究可能的虚构世界中的神圣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Church, Communication and Culture
Church, Communication and Culture Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
The invisible divine in the history of art. Is Erwin Panofsky (1892–1968) still relevant for decoding Christian iconography? Catholicism: A Global History from the French Revolution to Pope Francis Catholicism: A Global History from the French Revolution to Pope Francis , by John T. McGreevy, New York, NY, W.W. Norton & Company, 2022, 513 pp., €22, ISBN 978-1-324-00388-5 Listening to the Opus Dei Information Office in Navarra and the Basque Country: Good communication practices at the service of the governance of an institution Svelare il mistero. Filosofia e narrazione a confronto [Unveiling Mystery. Philosophy and Narration Compared] Svelare il mistero. Filosofia e narrazione a confronto [Unveiling Mystery. Philosophy and Narration Compared] , by Antonio Malo, Rome, ESC, 2021, 394 pp., €30.00, ISBN: 978-88-8333-945-5 The Pontifical messages of the World Day of Peace (1968–2024): An analytical introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1