{"title":"Race, class, gender and social entrepreneurship: extending the positionality of icons","authors":"H. Schachter","doi":"10.1108/jmh-11-2021-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to add information on how women's voices enriched American social entrepreneurship in the Progressive era. While most discussions of women as social entrepreneurs have centered on white middle class women, this article profiles two female agents for change and innovation who came out of the white working class and Boston's Black elite, respectively. These additions provide an analysis of female participation that takes account of issues of intersectionality and positionality, important concepts in contemporary critical theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis article extends our understanding of women's role as social entrepreneurs in the early twentieth century by offering biographies of Rose Schneiderman and Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin based on extensive examination of sources from Progressive era documents to contemporary scholarly analyses. Inclusion of Progressive era sources enables the narrative to suggest how these social entrepreneurs were viewed in their own day.\n\n\nFindings\nBiographies of Rose Schneiderman and Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin indicate the broad range of women who developed new organizations to serve traditionally marginalized populations in the Progressive era. The article shows the types of obstacles each woman faced; it enumerates strategies they used to further their aims as well as recording some of the times they could not surmount class- or race-based obstacles placed in their paths.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAt a time when issues of intersectionality and positionality have become more prominent in management discourse, this article expands the class and race backgrounds of women specifically proposed as icons of social entrepreneurship. It represents an early attempt to link these concepts with the study of entrepreneurship.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-11-2021-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to add information on how women's voices enriched American social entrepreneurship in the Progressive era. While most discussions of women as social entrepreneurs have centered on white middle class women, this article profiles two female agents for change and innovation who came out of the white working class and Boston's Black elite, respectively. These additions provide an analysis of female participation that takes account of issues of intersectionality and positionality, important concepts in contemporary critical theory.
Design/methodology/approach
This article extends our understanding of women's role as social entrepreneurs in the early twentieth century by offering biographies of Rose Schneiderman and Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin based on extensive examination of sources from Progressive era documents to contemporary scholarly analyses. Inclusion of Progressive era sources enables the narrative to suggest how these social entrepreneurs were viewed in their own day.
Findings
Biographies of Rose Schneiderman and Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin indicate the broad range of women who developed new organizations to serve traditionally marginalized populations in the Progressive era. The article shows the types of obstacles each woman faced; it enumerates strategies they used to further their aims as well as recording some of the times they could not surmount class- or race-based obstacles placed in their paths.
Originality/value
At a time when issues of intersectionality and positionality have become more prominent in management discourse, this article expands the class and race backgrounds of women specifically proposed as icons of social entrepreneurship. It represents an early attempt to link these concepts with the study of entrepreneurship.
目的本文旨在为进步时代女性的声音如何丰富了美国的社会企业家精神提供信息。虽然大多数关于女性作为社会企业家的讨论都集中在白人中产阶级女性身上,但本文介绍了两位分别来自白人工人阶级和波士顿黑人精英阶层的女性变革和创新代理人。这些补充提供了对女性参与的分析,考虑到交叉性和位置性问题,这是当代批评理论中的重要概念。本文通过提供罗斯·施奈德曼和约瑟芬·圣·皮埃尔·鲁芬的传记,扩展了我们对二十世纪初女性作为社会企业家角色的理解,这些传记基于对进步时代文献和当代学术分析的广泛研究。包含进步时代的资料使叙述能够表明这些社会企业家在他们自己的时代是如何被看待的。Rose Schneiderman和Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin的传记表明,在进步时代,有很多女性建立了新的组织,为传统上被边缘化的人群服务。这篇文章展示了每位女性面临的障碍类型;它列举了他们为实现目标所采取的策略,并记录了他们无法克服道路上基于阶级或种族的障碍的一些时候。当交叉性和位置性问题在管理话语中变得更加突出时,本文扩展了女性的阶级和种族背景,特别是作为社会企业家精神的象征。它代表了将这些概念与企业家精神研究联系起来的早期尝试。