Playing with frames of reference in veneration rituals: Fractal dynamics in encounters with a Muslim saint

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Theory Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1463499619841212
Jens Kreinath
{"title":"Playing with frames of reference in veneration rituals: Fractal dynamics in encounters with a Muslim saint","authors":"Jens Kreinath","doi":"10.1177/1463499619841212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paradigmatic shifts in anthropological theory shape the ways in which play and ritual are conceptualized. By demarcating these shifts, the argument is made that an analysis of both play and ritual must start with the possibility of choice as distributed among participants who engage in play and ritual as forms of social practice. Taking the dynamics of framing in play and ritual and the patterns emerging in social interaction as a point of departure, the configuration of ‘fractal dynamics’ is introduced to relate play and rituals as emerging through recursive processes of framing social interaction. Based on rituals of saint veneration among Arab Alawites in southernmost Turkey, it is argued that not only are forms of ritual interaction among devotees at pilgrimage sites playful but also that ritual interactions of devotees with the saint are a form of existential play of chance and disguise. By taking into account the myth and social cosmology that institutes such rituals of veneration and interaction with the saint, it is concluded that these rituals of veneration and interaction with the saint as a non-human agent play with frames of reference. This is done in similar ways, as when the saint acts as a trickster or symbolic type and is perceived by devotees as playing with their perception through disguise and simulation. The reconfiguration of play and ritual through ‘fractal dynamics’ does not only explain the changing dynamics of social configurations in religious interactions with non-human agents, but it also helps to account for probability and choice—and simulation and disguise—in social situations that border the religious and mundane.","PeriodicalId":51554,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Theory","volume":"20 1","pages":"221 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1463499619841212","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499619841212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Paradigmatic shifts in anthropological theory shape the ways in which play and ritual are conceptualized. By demarcating these shifts, the argument is made that an analysis of both play and ritual must start with the possibility of choice as distributed among participants who engage in play and ritual as forms of social practice. Taking the dynamics of framing in play and ritual and the patterns emerging in social interaction as a point of departure, the configuration of ‘fractal dynamics’ is introduced to relate play and rituals as emerging through recursive processes of framing social interaction. Based on rituals of saint veneration among Arab Alawites in southernmost Turkey, it is argued that not only are forms of ritual interaction among devotees at pilgrimage sites playful but also that ritual interactions of devotees with the saint are a form of existential play of chance and disguise. By taking into account the myth and social cosmology that institutes such rituals of veneration and interaction with the saint, it is concluded that these rituals of veneration and interaction with the saint as a non-human agent play with frames of reference. This is done in similar ways, as when the saint acts as a trickster or symbolic type and is perceived by devotees as playing with their perception through disguise and simulation. The reconfiguration of play and ritual through ‘fractal dynamics’ does not only explain the changing dynamics of social configurations in religious interactions with non-human agents, but it also helps to account for probability and choice—and simulation and disguise—in social situations that border the religious and mundane.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在崇拜仪式中玩参考框架:与穆斯林圣人相遇的分形动力学
人类学理论中的范式转变塑造了游戏和仪式概念化的方式。通过对这些转变进行划分,作者认为,对游戏和仪式的分析必须从选择的可能性开始,这些选择分布在参与游戏和仪式作为社会实践形式的参与者之间。以游戏和仪式的框架动态以及社会互动中出现的模式为出发点,引入“分形动力学”的配置,将游戏和仪式联系起来,通过框架社会互动的递归过程出现。基于土耳其最南部阿拉伯阿拉维派的圣人崇拜仪式,有人认为,不仅朝圣地点的奉献者之间的仪式互动形式很有趣,而且奉献者与圣人的仪式互动是一种机会和伪装的存在主义游戏形式。考虑到神话和社会宇宙观,这些仪式的崇拜和与圣人的互动,得出的结论是,这些仪式的崇拜和与圣人的互动作为一个非人类的代理发挥参考框架。这是以类似的方式完成的,当圣人扮演一个骗子或象征性的角色,被奉献者认为是通过伪装和模拟来玩弄他们的感知。通过“分形动力学”重新配置游戏和仪式不仅解释了宗教与非人类主体互动中社会配置的变化动态,而且还有助于解释在宗教和世俗之间的社会情境中的概率和选择,以及模拟和伪装。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Theory
Anthropological Theory ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Anthropological Theory is an international peer reviewed journal seeking to strengthen anthropological theorizing in different areas of the world. This is an exciting forum for new insights into theoretical issues in anthropology and more broadly, social theory. Anthropological Theory publishes articles engaging with a variety of theoretical debates in areas including: * marxism * feminism * political philosophy * historical sociology * hermeneutics * critical theory * philosophy of science * biological anthropology * archaeology
期刊最新文献
Improvisation, collective structure, and culture change: A theory of bricolage What kinship is and is not in the work of Marshall Sahlins … and beyond In search of decolonised political futures: Engaging Mahmood Mamdani's neither settler nor native Justice and reconciliation: Responses to critics in Anthropological Theory Surviving colonialism? A response to Neither Settler nor Native
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1