Venture Capital Law in China by Lin Lin, Cambridge University Press, 2021. 356 pp. Hardcover: £ 85.00

Q3 Social Sciences Asian Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1017/asjcl.2021.8
Li Guo
{"title":"Venture Capital Law in China by Lin Lin, Cambridge University Press, 2021. 356 pp. Hardcover: £ 85.00","authors":"Li Guo","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite having a relatively short history as compared to its western counterparts, China’s venture capital (VC) market witnessed an impressive growth in recent years. With 29.4 per cent of global VC injected into Chinese start-ups in 2018, China’s VC market has become the second largest in the world in terms of deal value, attracting both domestic and foreign investors with immense opportunities and ever-increasing technological innovation. However, the law and practice of VC in China has not been sufficiently examined in academic writings despite its size and significance as well as the immense potential for legal research. There was a lack of discussion from a legal perspective as to how the Chinese government played a role in engineering its domestic VC market. In this regard, as a valuable and timely contribution to the scarce scholarship on the Chinese VC industry, Venture Capital Law in China fills the gap in the literature with sophisticated and systematic case studies of China. Through an in-depth comparative analysis of the VC markets in China and the United States (US), the author highlights the distinctive legal features observed in the creation and the development of the Chinese VC market, thus providing VC scholars, policy makers, and practitioners with insights into this significant yet poorly understood sector. Structurally, the book begins with a useful and pertinent introduction to the VC market in China (p 1–43). Chronologically dividing the historical development of the Chinese VC market into five periods, the author argues that the Chinese government has adopted a top-down approach characterized by a regulatory framework consisting mainly of piecemeal interim regulation to ensure the simultaneous availability of investment capital, specialized financial intermediaries, and entrepreneurs – the three essential factors presented in Ronald Gilson’s ‘simultaneity problem’ in the engineering of a VC market. The following chapters of the book provide a detailed examination of the main stages of a standard VC life cycle including fundraising (p 44–142), investment (p 143–212), and exit (p 213–304) through the lens of the VC market in China. Unique features that exist in VC practice in China have been identified and analyzed in each of the stages. For example, the author includes an in-depth account of the prevalence of the valuation adjustment mechanism (‘VAM’) agreements in VC contracting in China, which is one of the many peculiar characteristics that distinguishes it from its international counterparts (p 177–185). The author further discusses the reasons for the prevalence of this special contractual design as well as the associated problems (p 186–207) in the context of","PeriodicalId":39405,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite having a relatively short history as compared to its western counterparts, China’s venture capital (VC) market witnessed an impressive growth in recent years. With 29.4 per cent of global VC injected into Chinese start-ups in 2018, China’s VC market has become the second largest in the world in terms of deal value, attracting both domestic and foreign investors with immense opportunities and ever-increasing technological innovation. However, the law and practice of VC in China has not been sufficiently examined in academic writings despite its size and significance as well as the immense potential for legal research. There was a lack of discussion from a legal perspective as to how the Chinese government played a role in engineering its domestic VC market. In this regard, as a valuable and timely contribution to the scarce scholarship on the Chinese VC industry, Venture Capital Law in China fills the gap in the literature with sophisticated and systematic case studies of China. Through an in-depth comparative analysis of the VC markets in China and the United States (US), the author highlights the distinctive legal features observed in the creation and the development of the Chinese VC market, thus providing VC scholars, policy makers, and practitioners with insights into this significant yet poorly understood sector. Structurally, the book begins with a useful and pertinent introduction to the VC market in China (p 1–43). Chronologically dividing the historical development of the Chinese VC market into five periods, the author argues that the Chinese government has adopted a top-down approach characterized by a regulatory framework consisting mainly of piecemeal interim regulation to ensure the simultaneous availability of investment capital, specialized financial intermediaries, and entrepreneurs – the three essential factors presented in Ronald Gilson’s ‘simultaneity problem’ in the engineering of a VC market. The following chapters of the book provide a detailed examination of the main stages of a standard VC life cycle including fundraising (p 44–142), investment (p 143–212), and exit (p 213–304) through the lens of the VC market in China. Unique features that exist in VC practice in China have been identified and analyzed in each of the stages. For example, the author includes an in-depth account of the prevalence of the valuation adjustment mechanism (‘VAM’) agreements in VC contracting in China, which is one of the many peculiar characteristics that distinguishes it from its international counterparts (p 177–185). The author further discusses the reasons for the prevalence of this special contractual design as well as the associated problems (p 186–207) in the context of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林林著《中国风险投资法》,剑桥大学出版社,2021年。356页精装本:85.00英镑
尽管与西方同行相比,中国的风险投资市场历史相对较短,但近年来却出现了令人印象深刻的增长。2018年,全球29.4%的风险投资注入了中国初创企业,中国的风险投资市场已成为交易价值全球第二大市场,吸引了国内外投资者,带来了巨大的机会和不断增长的技术创新。然而,尽管风险投资的规模和意义以及法律研究的巨大潜力,但中国的风险投资法律和实践在学术著作中并没有得到充分的研究。对于中国政府如何在国内风险投资市场中发挥作用,缺乏从法律角度进行的讨论。在这方面,《中国风险投资法》作为对中国风险投资行业稀缺学术的宝贵而及时的贡献,以复杂而系统的中国案例研究填补了文献空白。通过对中美风险投资市场的深入比较分析,作者强调了中国风险投资市场在创建和发展过程中所观察到的独特法律特征,从而为风险投资学者、政策制定者和从业者提供了对这一重要但鲜为人知的领域的见解。从结构上讲,本书以对中国风险投资市场有用且中肯的介绍开始(第1-43页)。作者将中国风险投资市场的历史发展按时间划分为五个时期,认为中国政府采取了自上而下的方法,其特点是监管框架主要由零碎的临时监管组成,以确保投资资本、专业金融中介机构,和企业家——罗纳德·吉尔森在风险投资市场工程中提出的“同时性问题”中提出的三个基本因素。本书的以下章节通过中国风险投资市场的视角,详细考察了标准风险投资生命周期的主要阶段,包括筹资(第44–142页)、投资(第143–212页)和退出(第213–304页)。在中国风险投资实践中存在的独特特征在每个阶段都得到了识别和分析。例如,作者深入介绍了中国风险投资合同中估值调整机制(“VAM”)协议的普遍性,这是其区别于国际同行的许多独特特征之一(第177–185页)。作者进一步讨论了这种特殊合同设计盛行的原因以及在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Asian Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Comparative Law (AsJCL) is the leading forum for research and discussion of the law and legal systems of Asia. It embraces work that is theoretical, empirical, socio-legal, doctrinal or comparative that relates to one or more Asian legal systems, as well as work that compares one or more Asian legal systems with non-Asian systems. The Journal seeks articles which display an intimate knowledge of Asian legal systems, and thus provide a window into the way they work in practice. The AsJCL is an initiative of the Asian Law Institute (ASLI), an association established by thirteen leading law schools in Asia and with a rapidly expanding membership base across Asia and in other regions around the world.
期刊最新文献
International Sanctions and the Rule of Law How Can Malaysian Courts Consistently Perform Meaningful Constitutional Rights Review? Lessons from Past Cases and the Way Forward Confused Purposes and Inconsistent Adjudication: An Assessment of Bail Decisions in Delhi's Courts Soviet Legacy of Vietnam's Intellectual Property Law: Big Brother is (No Longer) Watching You – CORRIGENDUM Conceptualising State-Centric Mediation: An Analysis of China's Foreign Investment Complaints Mechanism – ERRATUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1