A systematic literature mapping of current academic research linking warehouse management systems to the third-party logistics context

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Acta Logistica Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.22306/al.v10i2.377
Daria Minashkina, A. Happonen
{"title":"A systematic literature mapping of current academic research linking warehouse management systems to the third-party logistics context","authors":"Daria Minashkina, A. Happonen","doi":"10.22306/al.v10i2.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic research on third-party logistics operators selecting warehouse management systems is scarce at best, based on found 86 area-specific studies written in English. Only 17 studies had mentions of 3PL and WMS but did not directly reference 3PL using WMS. Eighty-six studies covering four main categories contributed to understanding ongoing research in WMS characteristics and the 3PL context. One category is warehouse characteristics relevant to WMS, and the others concern the warehouse management system as its taxonomy, functions, features, and deployment considerations. Within these four categories, 17 subtopic areas were identified. WMS deployment considerations had the highest number of subtopics (ten), being the most focused area for WMS selection considerations for the system's successful implementation and operation usage. WMS functions and features category contained only a subtopic, indicating a need for additional research on operational functions in management systems and 3PL operations context. Award-winning 3PL validated our findings, utilizing their extensive industry experience. Based on the 3PLs validation review, fast-developing and technology areas, such as digitalization and the newest warehouse management technologies, were the only areas missing from the academic literature. Research is carried out to map the missing specific digitalization, technology-based research, development, innovation possibilities, and WMS sustainability-related knowledge gaps. By addressing the knowledge gap in existing literature, the study significantly contributes to understanding WMS utilization in the 3PL context, providing new insights into WMS characteristics overview, advancing research in 3PL logistics selecting WMS, and defining future research venues of WMS aspects.","PeriodicalId":36880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Logistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Logistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v10i2.377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Academic research on third-party logistics operators selecting warehouse management systems is scarce at best, based on found 86 area-specific studies written in English. Only 17 studies had mentions of 3PL and WMS but did not directly reference 3PL using WMS. Eighty-six studies covering four main categories contributed to understanding ongoing research in WMS characteristics and the 3PL context. One category is warehouse characteristics relevant to WMS, and the others concern the warehouse management system as its taxonomy, functions, features, and deployment considerations. Within these four categories, 17 subtopic areas were identified. WMS deployment considerations had the highest number of subtopics (ten), being the most focused area for WMS selection considerations for the system's successful implementation and operation usage. WMS functions and features category contained only a subtopic, indicating a need for additional research on operational functions in management systems and 3PL operations context. Award-winning 3PL validated our findings, utilizing their extensive industry experience. Based on the 3PLs validation review, fast-developing and technology areas, such as digitalization and the newest warehouse management technologies, were the only areas missing from the academic literature. Research is carried out to map the missing specific digitalization, technology-based research, development, innovation possibilities, and WMS sustainability-related knowledge gaps. By addressing the knowledge gap in existing literature, the study significantly contributes to understanding WMS utilization in the 3PL context, providing new insights into WMS characteristics overview, advancing research in 3PL logistics selecting WMS, and defining future research venues of WMS aspects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个系统的文献映射当前的学术研究链接仓库管理系统的第三方物流背景
基于发现的86项用英语撰写的特定领域研究,关于第三方物流运营商选择仓库管理系统的学术研究充其量也很少。只有17项研究提到了第三方物流和WMS,但没有直接提及使用WMS的第三方配送。86项涵盖四个主要类别的研究有助于理解正在进行的WMS特征和第三方物流背景研究。一类是与WMS相关的仓库特征,另一类涉及仓库管理系统的分类、功能、特性和部署注意事项。在这四个类别中,确定了17个分专题领域。WMS部署注意事项的子主题数量最多(10个),是系统成功实施和操作使用的WMS选择注意事项最关注的领域。WMS功能和特性类别仅包含一个子主题,表明需要对管理系统和第三方物流运营上下文中的运营功能进行额外研究。屡获殊荣的第三方物流利用其丰富的行业经验验证了我们的发现。根据第三方物流验证审查,快速发展和技术领域,如数字化和最新的仓库管理技术,是学术文献中唯一缺失的领域。开展研究是为了绘制缺失的具体数字化、基于技术的研究、开发、创新可能性和WMS可持续性相关知识差距。通过解决现有文献中的知识差距,该研究显著有助于理解第三方物流背景下的WMS利用率,为WMS特征概述提供新的见解,推进第三方仓储物流选择WMS的研究,并确定WMS方面的未来研究场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Logistica
Acta Logistica Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation of operations on the production line as a tool for making the production process more efficient The disruptive times of Covid-19: higher education leadership and management logistics in Arab nations Streamlining logistics flows with lean tools using TX Plant Simulation software support Improving allocation and layout in production logistics Assessing the Bullwhip effect in supply chain: trends, gaps, and overlaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1