Strangers in the Village

Q1 Arts and Humanities James Baldwin Review Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.7227/jbr.5.4
Monika Gehlawat
{"title":"Strangers in the Village","authors":"Monika Gehlawat","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay uses Edward Said’s theory of affiliation to consider the\n relationship between James Baldwin and contemporary artists Teju Cole and Glenn\n Ligon, both of whom explicitly engage with their predecessor’s writing in\n their own work. Specifically, Baldwin’s essay “Stranger in the\n Village” (1953) serves a through-line for this discussion, as it is\n invoked in Cole’s essay “Black Body” and Ligon’s\n visual series, also titled Stranger in the Village. In\n juxtaposing these three artists, I argue that they express the dialectical\n energy of affiliation by articulating ongoing concerns of race relations in\n America while distinguishing themselves from Baldwin in terms of periodization,\n medium-specificity, and their broader relationship to Western art practice. In\n their adoption of Baldwin, Cole and Ligon also imagine a way beyond his\n historical anxieties and writing-based practice, even as they continue to\n reinscribe their own work with his arguments about the African-American\n experience. This essay is an intermedial study that reads fiction, nonfiction,\n language-based conceptual art and mixed media, as well as contemporary politics\n and social media in order consider the nuances of the African-American\n experience from the postwar period to our contemporary moment. Concerns about\n visuality/visibility in the public sphere, narrative voice, and\n self-representation, as well as access to cultural artifacts and aesthetic\n engagement, all emerge in my discussion of this constellation of artists. As a\n result, this essay identifies an emblematic, though not exclusive, strand of\n African-American intellectual thinking that has never before been brought\n together. It also demonstrates the ongoing relevance of Baldwin’s\n thinking for the contemporary political scene in this country.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This essay uses Edward Said’s theory of affiliation to consider the relationship between James Baldwin and contemporary artists Teju Cole and Glenn Ligon, both of whom explicitly engage with their predecessor’s writing in their own work. Specifically, Baldwin’s essay “Stranger in the Village” (1953) serves a through-line for this discussion, as it is invoked in Cole’s essay “Black Body” and Ligon’s visual series, also titled Stranger in the Village. In juxtaposing these three artists, I argue that they express the dialectical energy of affiliation by articulating ongoing concerns of race relations in America while distinguishing themselves from Baldwin in terms of periodization, medium-specificity, and their broader relationship to Western art practice. In their adoption of Baldwin, Cole and Ligon also imagine a way beyond his historical anxieties and writing-based practice, even as they continue to reinscribe their own work with his arguments about the African-American experience. This essay is an intermedial study that reads fiction, nonfiction, language-based conceptual art and mixed media, as well as contemporary politics and social media in order consider the nuances of the African-American experience from the postwar period to our contemporary moment. Concerns about visuality/visibility in the public sphere, narrative voice, and self-representation, as well as access to cultural artifacts and aesthetic engagement, all emerge in my discussion of this constellation of artists. As a result, this essay identifies an emblematic, though not exclusive, strand of African-American intellectual thinking that has never before been brought together. It also demonstrates the ongoing relevance of Baldwin’s thinking for the contemporary political scene in this country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
村子里的陌生人
本文运用爱德华·赛义德的隶属理论来考察詹姆斯·鲍德温与当代艺术家特朱·科尔和格伦·利贡之间的关系,他们都在自己的作品中明确参与了前任的写作。具体来说,鲍德温的文章《村庄里的陌生人》(1953年)为这场讨论提供了一条主线,正如科尔的文章《黑人身体》和利贡的视觉系列中所引用的那样,该系列也被命名为《村庄中的陌生人》。在将这三位艺术家并置的过程中,我认为他们通过表达对美国种族关系的持续关注来表达从属关系的辩证能量,同时在分期、媒介特异性以及他们与西方艺术实践的更广泛关系方面将自己与鲍德温区分开来。在收养鲍德温的过程中,科尔和利贡也想象了一种超越他历史焦虑和写作实践的方式,尽管他们继续用他关于非裔美国人经历的论点来重新描述自己的作品。这篇文章是一篇中间研究,阅读了小说、非小说、基于语言的概念艺术和混合媒体,以及当代政治和社交媒体,以考虑从战后到当代非裔美国人经历的细微差别。在我对这群艺术家的讨论中,我对公共领域的视觉性/可见性、叙事声音和自我表现,以及对文化文物和美学参与的关注都出现了。因此,这篇文章确定了一种象征性的(尽管不是排他性的)非裔美国人知识分子思想,这种思想以前从未融合在一起。这也表明了鲍德温的思想对这个国家当代政治场景的持续相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
“You Know What’s Cool about James Baldwin, Man?” “This Loaded Present” “A Very Dangerous Effort” On the Fugitive Radicalism of Jimmy’s Blues “Love Is the Key”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1