What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1145/3542921
Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Bongshin Lee, R. Deline, Adam Perer, S. Drucker
{"title":"What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior","authors":"Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Bongshin Lee, R. Deline, Adam Perer, S. Drucker","doi":"10.1145/3542921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data scientists require rich mental models of how AI systems behave to effectively train, debug, and work with them. Despite the prevalence of AI analysis tools, there is no general theory describing how people make sense of what their models have learned. We frame this process as a form of sensemaking and derive a framework describing how data scientists develop mental models of AI behavior. To evaluate the framework, we show how existing AI analysis tools fit into this sensemaking process and use it to design AIFinnity, a system for analyzing image-and-text models. Lastly, we explored how data scientists use a tool developed with the framework through a think-aloud study with 10 data scientists tasked with using AIFinnity to pick an image captioning model. We found that AIFinnity’s sensemaking workflow reflected participants’ mental processes and enabled them to discover and validate diverse AI behaviors.","PeriodicalId":50917,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3542921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Data scientists require rich mental models of how AI systems behave to effectively train, debug, and work with them. Despite the prevalence of AI analysis tools, there is no general theory describing how people make sense of what their models have learned. We frame this process as a form of sensemaking and derive a framework describing how data scientists develop mental models of AI behavior. To evaluate the framework, we show how existing AI analysis tools fit into this sensemaking process and use it to design AIFinnity, a system for analyzing image-and-text models. Lastly, we explored how data scientists use a tool developed with the framework through a think-aloud study with 10 data scientists tasked with using AIFinnity to pick an image captioning model. We found that AIFinnity’s sensemaking workflow reflected participants’ mental processes and enabled them to discover and validate diverse AI behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的AI学到了什么?数据科学家如何理解模型行为
数据科学家需要丰富的人工智能系统行为的心理模型来有效地训练、调试和使用它们。尽管人工智能分析工具很普遍,但没有通用的理论来描述人们如何理解他们的模型所学到的东西。我们将这一过程定义为一种感知形式,并推导出一个框架,描述数据科学家如何开发人工智能行为的心理模型。为了评估该框架,我们展示了现有的人工智能分析工具如何适应这一感知过程,并使用它来设计AIFinnity,一个分析图像和文本模型的系统。最后,我们通过对10名数据科学家的大声思考研究,探讨了数据科学家如何使用该框架开发的工具,这些数据科学家的任务是使用AIFinnity来选择图像字幕模型。我们发现,AIFinnity的感知工作流程反映了参与者的心理过程,使他们能够发现和验证不同的人工智能行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This ACM Transaction seeks to be the premier archival journal in the multidisciplinary field of human-computer interaction. Since its first issue in March 1994, it has presented work of the highest scientific quality that contributes to the practice in the present and future. The primary emphasis is on results of broad application, but the journal considers original work focused on specific domains, on special requirements, on ethical issues -- the full range of design, development, and use of interactive systems.
期刊最新文献
Unmaking electronic waste Household Wattch: Exploring opportunities for surveillance and consent through families’ household energy use data Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned Paradigms Naturalistic Digital Behavior Predicts Cognitive Abilities GUI Behaviors to Minimize Pointing-based Interaction Interferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1