ChatGPT and Librarians for Reference Consultations

Adebowale Jeremy Adetayo
{"title":"ChatGPT and Librarians for Reference Consultations","authors":"Adebowale Jeremy Adetayo","doi":"10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of the 54 students at Adeleke University surveyed, they acknowledged the advantages of ChatGPT such as its convenience, user-friendliness, extensive knowledge base, and accessibility. However, they also pointed out its limitations including the inability to comprehend emotions, limitations in answering complex questions, potential for providing incorrect answers, and risk of outdated information. Despite these drawbacks, the students still expressed their intention to seek reference assistance from ChatGPT, as well as from librarians. The research suggests that library administration should embrace technology to ensure that students have convenient access to reference services.","PeriodicalId":35377,"journal":{"name":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of the 54 students at Adeleke University surveyed, they acknowledged the advantages of ChatGPT such as its convenience, user-friendliness, extensive knowledge base, and accessibility. However, they also pointed out its limitations including the inability to comprehend emotions, limitations in answering complex questions, potential for providing incorrect answers, and risk of outdated information. Despite these drawbacks, the students still expressed their intention to seek reference assistance from ChatGPT, as well as from librarians. The research suggests that library administration should embrace technology to ensure that students have convenient access to reference services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT和图书馆员参考咨询
摘要本研究旨在探讨学生对ChatGPT的使用观点,以及它与传统参考图书馆员相比的潜在优势和劣势。本研究采用描述性调查研究方法,通过描述性和推断统计学对收集的数据进行分析。在阿德勒克大学接受调查的54名学生中,他们承认ChatGPT的优势,如它的便利性、用户友好性、广泛的知识库和可访问性。然而,他们也指出了它的局限性,包括无法理解情绪、回答复杂问题的局限性、提供错误答案的可能性以及信息过时的风险。尽管存在这些缺点,学生们仍然表示他们打算向ChatGPT和图书馆员寻求参考帮助。研究表明,图书馆管理部门应采用技术,确保学生能够方便地获得参考咨询服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
Internet Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Internet Reference Services Quarterly tackles the tough job of keeping librarians up to date with the latest developments in Internet referencing and librarianship. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal is designed to function as a comprehensive information source librarians can turn to and count on for keeping up-to-date on emerging technological innovations, while emphasizing theoretical, research, and practical applications of Internet-related information services, sources, and resources. Librarians from any size or type of library in any discipline get the knowledge needed on how to best improve service through one of the most powerful reference tools available on the Internet.
期刊最新文献
Enriching Bibliographic Records Using AI – A Pilot by Ex Libris Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators “ChatGPT Assists Me in My Reference List:” Exploring the Chatbot’s Potential as Citation Formatting Tool Information Literacy Instruction Services at Rural Community Colleges, Fall 2019 Through AY 2021/22 “Don’t Let Grammarly Overwrite Your Style and Voice:” Writers’ Advice on Using Grammarly in Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1