Oral health-related quality of life between Chinese and American orthodontic patients: A two-center cross-sectional study

Youbai Chen , Tianqi Li , Yujian Xu , Jiahua Xing , Weiqian Jiang , Xiangye Yin , Haizhong Zhang , Meredith August , Katherine P. Klein , Tong Zhang
{"title":"Oral health-related quality of life between Chinese and American orthodontic patients: A two-center cross-sectional study","authors":"Youbai Chen ,&nbsp;Tianqi Li ,&nbsp;Yujian Xu ,&nbsp;Jiahua Xing ,&nbsp;Weiqian Jiang ,&nbsp;Xiangye Yin ,&nbsp;Haizhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Meredith August ,&nbsp;Katherine P. Klein ,&nbsp;Tong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in orthodontic patients has been assessed in the past, to date, no study has compared the OHRQoL between two nations. We aimed to compare the OHRQoL between Chinese and American orthodontic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a two-center questionnaire-based cross-sectional study among patients who underwent orthodontic treatments at the Chinese PLA General Hospital (PLAGH) in Beijing, China and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. Candidate variables included the participating center, patients’' age, sex, Angle’s classification of malocclusion, evaluation stage, and appliances used. The primary outcome was patients’ OHRQoL assessed with the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Descriptive statistics, stratification, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average age was lower for PLAGH patients than for MGH patients (21.1 ​± ​7.9 vs. 33.1 ​± ​14.6 years, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The most common type of malocclusion was Angle’s Class III malocclusion at PLAGH (39%) and Class I malocclusion at MGH (59.5%). Clear aligners were used in 34.1% and 2.7% of the patients at MGH and PLAGH, respectively. OHIP-14 scores were lower for PLAGH patients than for MGH patients (18.4 ​± ​4.7 vs. 22.3 ​± ​7.4, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001), particularly in functional limitation, psychological discomfort/disability, and handicap. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that participating center, age, Class I malocclusion, and the use of clear aligners were significantly associated with overall OHIP-14 scores. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that patients at PLAGH were associated with lower OHIP-14 scores (coefficient: −3; 95% CI: −5, −1.3; <em>P</em>=0.001), and age was positively associated with OHIP-14 scores (coefficient: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.13; <em>P</em>=0.038).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Chinese orthodontic patients had lower OHIP-14 scores, indicating a higher OHRQoL than American patients. In addition to the younger age, this difference may be attributed to the different ethical, cultural, educational, and socioeconomic background of Chinese and American orthodontic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 171-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691122000772/pdfft?md5=acc22cf6ec6219b9cd63e6888f2006bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2096691122000772-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691122000772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Although oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in orthodontic patients has been assessed in the past, to date, no study has compared the OHRQoL between two nations. We aimed to compare the OHRQoL between Chinese and American orthodontic patients.

Methods

We conducted a two-center questionnaire-based cross-sectional study among patients who underwent orthodontic treatments at the Chinese PLA General Hospital (PLAGH) in Beijing, China and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. Candidate variables included the participating center, patients’' age, sex, Angle’s classification of malocclusion, evaluation stage, and appliances used. The primary outcome was patients’ OHRQoL assessed with the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Descriptive statistics, stratification, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

The average age was lower for PLAGH patients than for MGH patients (21.1 ​± ​7.9 vs. 33.1 ​± ​14.6 years, P<0.001). The most common type of malocclusion was Angle’s Class III malocclusion at PLAGH (39%) and Class I malocclusion at MGH (59.5%). Clear aligners were used in 34.1% and 2.7% of the patients at MGH and PLAGH, respectively. OHIP-14 scores were lower for PLAGH patients than for MGH patients (18.4 ​± ​4.7 vs. 22.3 ​± ​7.4, P<0.001), particularly in functional limitation, psychological discomfort/disability, and handicap. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that participating center, age, Class I malocclusion, and the use of clear aligners were significantly associated with overall OHIP-14 scores. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that patients at PLAGH were associated with lower OHIP-14 scores (coefficient: −3; 95% CI: −5, −1.3; P=0.001), and age was positively associated with OHIP-14 scores (coefficient: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.13; P=0.038).

Conclusion

Chinese orthodontic patients had lower OHIP-14 scores, indicating a higher OHRQoL than American patients. In addition to the younger age, this difference may be attributed to the different ethical, cultural, educational, and socioeconomic background of Chinese and American orthodontic patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美正畸患者口腔健康生活质量的双中心横断面研究
虽然过去已经对正畸患者的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)进行了评估,但迄今为止,还没有研究对两个国家的OHRQoL进行比较。我们的目的是比较中国和美国正畸患者的OHRQoL。方法采用双中心问卷横断面研究,对在中国北京中国人民解放军总医院(PLAGH)和美国马萨诸塞州波士顿马萨诸塞州总医院(MGH)接受正畸治疗的患者进行调查。候选变量包括参与中心、患者年龄、性别、Angle错颌分类、评估阶段和使用矫治器。主要终点是用口腔健康影响量表-14 (OHIP-14)评估患者的OHRQoL。进行描述性统计、分层、单因素和多因素分析。结果PLAGH患者的平均年龄低于MGH患者(21.1±7.9岁∶33.1±14.6岁,P<0.001)。最常见的错牙合类型是PLAGH的Angle III类错牙合(39%)和MGH的I类错牙合(59.5%)。MGH和PLAGH分别有34.1%和2.7%的患者使用了透明矫正器。PLAGH患者的OHIP-14评分低于MGH患者(18.4±4.7比22.3±7.4,P<0.001),特别是在功能限制、心理不适/残疾和残疾方面。单因素回归分析显示,参与中心、年龄、I类错颌和使用矫正器与OHIP-14总分显著相关。多因素回归分析表明,PLAGH患者与较低的OHIP-14评分相关(系数:−3;95% ci:−5,−1.3;P=0.001),年龄与OHIP-14评分呈正相关(系数:0.1;95% ci: 0.004, 0.13;P = 0.038)。结论中国正畸患者OHIP-14评分低于美国患者,OHRQoL高于美国患者。除了年龄更小外,这种差异可能归因于中美正畸患者不同的伦理、文化、教育和社会经济背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary treatment of molten aluminum combined burn: An unusual case report Lateral circumflex femoral artery perforator flap for the reconstruction of head soft tissue defects: Cross-region venous anastomosis Role of targeted neuromodulation in the treatment of congenital unilateral lower lip palsy: A clinical case report A new technique for correction of iatrogenic upper eyelid retraction by using a composite flap of the orbicularis muscle and fascia on the anterior surface of the tarsal plate A new technique of monsplasty as an adjunctive procedure in cases of abdominoplasty: A prospective clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1