Geographical Distance from Quaternary Treatment Center Does Not Impact Choice of Upfront Therapy, Clinical Trial Participation and Outcomes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML

IF 23.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Pub Date : 2020-11-05 DOI:10.1182/BLOOD-2020-134645
S. Hershenfeld, Steven M. Chan, Vikas Gupta, D. Maze, Caroline J. McNamara, M. Minden, T. Murphy, A. Schuh, H. Sibai, K. Yee, A. Schimmer
{"title":"Geographical Distance from Quaternary Treatment Center Does Not Impact Choice of Upfront Therapy, Clinical Trial Participation and Outcomes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML","authors":"S. Hershenfeld, Steven M. Chan, Vikas Gupta, D. Maze, Caroline J. McNamara, M. Minden, T. Murphy, A. Schuh, H. Sibai, K. Yee, A. Schimmer","doi":"10.1182/BLOOD-2020-134645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upfront therapy for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes intensive induction chemotherapy with curative intent, low dose chemotherapy, best supportive care, and clinical trials. The choice between these therapies is influenced by multiple factors including age, cytogenetic and molecular mutations, and performance status. In our single payer provincial health care system, induction chemotherapy and clinical trials are only offered at a small number of specialized quaternary care centers with geographically large catchment areas. As a result, some patients are required to travel long distances for their appointments, which may constitute a barrier to care, especially among elderly patients. We therefore asked whether distance from the quaternary center influences the choice of care for AML.\n We reviewed the records of patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with AML from 2015-2017 and assessed at our quaternary care center in Toronto, Canada. We compared upfront therapy choice and survival between patients living close versus distant from the cancer center (empirically defined as <50 km versus >50km) and stratified by age.\n A total of 675 patients were assessed by our quaternary center for a new diagnosis of AML during the timeframe studied. Of those patients, 477 (71%) patients lived ≤50km, and 198 (29%) patients lived >50km from the quaternary center. The overall median distance from patient residence to the quaternary center was 33.2km (range: 1-1791km), and the median distance of patients in the >50km group was 93km (range: 50.2-1791km). Age, sex, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and cytogenetic risk were not significantly different between the two groups.\n There were no differences in the proportion of patients receiving induction chemotherapy or clinical trial as upfront therapy between patients living close versus distant from the quaternary center, even when stratified for age ≥70 years.\n There was no difference in overall survival between patients living ≤50km versus >50km from the quaternary center either overall, or when stratified by age.\n In conclusion, geographic distance from treatment center does not appear to impact choice of upfront therapy, access to clinical trials, or clinical outcomes in this study of newly diagnosed patients with AML treated in a single payer environment.\n \n \n \n Gupta: Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock .\n","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"15-16"},"PeriodicalIF":23.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD-2020-134645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Upfront therapy for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes intensive induction chemotherapy with curative intent, low dose chemotherapy, best supportive care, and clinical trials. The choice between these therapies is influenced by multiple factors including age, cytogenetic and molecular mutations, and performance status. In our single payer provincial health care system, induction chemotherapy and clinical trials are only offered at a small number of specialized quaternary care centers with geographically large catchment areas. As a result, some patients are required to travel long distances for their appointments, which may constitute a barrier to care, especially among elderly patients. We therefore asked whether distance from the quaternary center influences the choice of care for AML. We reviewed the records of patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with AML from 2015-2017 and assessed at our quaternary care center in Toronto, Canada. We compared upfront therapy choice and survival between patients living close versus distant from the cancer center (empirically defined as <50 km versus >50km) and stratified by age. A total of 675 patients were assessed by our quaternary center for a new diagnosis of AML during the timeframe studied. Of those patients, 477 (71%) patients lived ≤50km, and 198 (29%) patients lived >50km from the quaternary center. The overall median distance from patient residence to the quaternary center was 33.2km (range: 1-1791km), and the median distance of patients in the >50km group was 93km (range: 50.2-1791km). Age, sex, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and cytogenetic risk were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients receiving induction chemotherapy or clinical trial as upfront therapy between patients living close versus distant from the quaternary center, even when stratified for age ≥70 years. There was no difference in overall survival between patients living ≤50km versus >50km from the quaternary center either overall, or when stratified by age. In conclusion, geographic distance from treatment center does not appear to impact choice of upfront therapy, access to clinical trials, or clinical outcomes in this study of newly diagnosed patients with AML treated in a single payer environment. Gupta: Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与第四纪治疗中心的地理距离不影响新诊断AML患者的前期治疗选择、临床试验参与和结果
新诊断的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的前期治疗包括有治疗意图的强化诱导化疗、低剂量化疗、最佳支持性护理和临床试验。这些疗法的选择受到多种因素的影响,包括年龄、细胞遗传学和分子突变以及表现状态。在我们的单一付款人省级医疗保健系统中,诱导化疗和临床试验仅在少数地理上覆盖面积较大的专业四级医疗中心提供。因此,一些患者需要长途跋涉赴约,这可能会对护理构成障碍,尤其是在老年患者中。因此,我们询问与第四纪中心的距离是否会影响AML的护理选择。我们回顾了2015-2017年诊断为AML的≥18岁患者的记录,并在加拿大多伦多的四级护理中心进行了评估。我们比较了居住在癌症中心附近和远离中心(经验定义为50公里)的患者的前期治疗选择和生存率,并按年龄分层。在研究的时间段内,我们的四级中心共评估了675名患者,以获得AML的新诊断。在这些患者中,477名(71%)患者居住在距离第四纪中心≤50公里的地方,198名(29%)患者居住于距离第四纪中心>50公里的地方。从患者住所到第四纪中心的总体中位距离为33.2km(范围:1-1791km),>50km组患者的中位距离是93km(范围:50.2-1791km)。两组之间的年龄、性别、基线东方肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG)和细胞遗传学风险没有显著差异。即使按年龄≥70岁进行分层,居住在离四级中心较近和较远的患者之间,接受诱导化疗或临床试验作为前期治疗的患者比例也没有差异。无论是总体而言,还是按年龄分层,居住在距离第四纪中心≤50公里与>50公里的患者的总体生存率都没有差异。总之,在这项针对在单一付款人环境中接受治疗的新诊断AML患者的研究中,与治疗中心的地理距离似乎不会影响前期治疗的选择、临床试验的机会或临床结果。Gupta:Bristol MyersSquibb:Honoria,实体董事会或咨询委员会成员;诺华:咨询、荣誉、实体董事会或咨询委员会成员、研究资助;Incyte:Honoria,研究资助;辉瑞:咨询公司;Sierra肿瘤学:咨询,实体董事会或咨询委员会成员。迷宫:诺华:Honoria;辉瑞:咨询公司;武田:研究资助。麦克纳马拉:诺华:荣誉。Schimmer:武田:荣誉奖,研究资助;诺华:Honoria;爵士乐:Honoria;大冢:Honoria;Medivir AB:研究资助;AbbVie制药:其他:拥有股票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood
Blood 医学-血液学
CiteScore
23.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
955
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Blood, the official journal of the American Society of Hematology, published online and in print, provides an international forum for the publication of original articles describing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. Primary research articles will be published under the following scientific categories: Clinical Trials and Observations; Gene Therapy; Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells; Immunobiology and Immunotherapy scope; Myeloid Neoplasia; Lymphoid Neoplasia; Phagocytes, Granulocytes and Myelopoiesis; Platelets and Thrombopoiesis; Red Cells, Iron and Erythropoiesis; Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Transfusion Medicine; Transplantation; and Vascular Biology. Papers can be listed under more than one category as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
CD371-targeted CAR T cells secreting interleukin-18 exhibit robust expansion and clear refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Acalabrutinib to assail CLL in the frail. Asquith NL, Carminita E, Camacho V, et al. The bone marrow is the primary site of thrombopoiesis. Blood. 2024;143(3):272-278. Matchmaking gene therapy with mimetic antibodies. Runx2 takes center stage in regulating HSC expansion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1