At høre det uhørte: Teologisk epistemologi som dialogisk livsorientering

Q4 Arts and Humanities Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.7146/dtt.v86i1.137463
Claudia Welz
{"title":"At høre det uhørte: Teologisk epistemologi som dialogisk livsorientering","authors":"Claudia Welz","doi":"10.7146/dtt.v86i1.137463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does it mean to listen to what cannot be heard? In this article, the “unheard-of” is explored along two different tracks: (a) as something God-given or divinely revealed (in the context of theology and philosophy of religion) and (b) as something egregious or criminal (in the context of ethics and trauma studies). Theological epistemology is here developed with a special focus on the limits of the cognition and knowledge of God in Christianity (Anselm of Canterbury, Luther) and contemporary Judaism (Buber, Levinas), and on the significance of dialogue and second-person encounters. Epistemology is connected with a hermeneutics of the senses, where the human being is regarded as a witness who “listens” to something transcendent which can only be articulated on the basis of acoustic or auditory metaphors but nonetheless remains inaudible. In relation to an ethical and religious life-orientation (Kant, Stegmaier, etc.), listening is described as medio-passivity “in-between” activity and passivity, subjectivity and alterity. It is argued that the listener’s personal responsivity (Waldenfels) and responsibility (Buber, Levinas) remain opposed to “resonance” (Rosa) and an “echo” (Nancy) that has no distinct voice. Methodologically, epistemology as dialogical life-orientation is seen as part of a theory-practice feedback-loop which requires patient, hospitable listening practices in view of irresolvable theoretical tensions and fruitful paradoxes that always spur further thought.","PeriodicalId":38473,"journal":{"name":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v86i1.137463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does it mean to listen to what cannot be heard? In this article, the “unheard-of” is explored along two different tracks: (a) as something God-given or divinely revealed (in the context of theology and philosophy of religion) and (b) as something egregious or criminal (in the context of ethics and trauma studies). Theological epistemology is here developed with a special focus on the limits of the cognition and knowledge of God in Christianity (Anselm of Canterbury, Luther) and contemporary Judaism (Buber, Levinas), and on the significance of dialogue and second-person encounters. Epistemology is connected with a hermeneutics of the senses, where the human being is regarded as a witness who “listens” to something transcendent which can only be articulated on the basis of acoustic or auditory metaphors but nonetheless remains inaudible. In relation to an ethical and religious life-orientation (Kant, Stegmaier, etc.), listening is described as medio-passivity “in-between” activity and passivity, subjectivity and alterity. It is argued that the listener’s personal responsivity (Waldenfels) and responsibility (Buber, Levinas) remain opposed to “resonance” (Rosa) and an “echo” (Nancy) that has no distinct voice. Methodologically, epistemology as dialogical life-orientation is seen as part of a theory-practice feedback-loop which requires patient, hospitable listening practices in view of irresolvable theoretical tensions and fruitful paradoxes that always spur further thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听不见的东西意味着什么?在这篇文章中,“闻所未闻”沿着两个不同的轨道进行了探索:(a)作为上帝赋予或神圣揭示的东西(在神学和宗教哲学的背景下)和(b)作为令人震惊或犯罪的东西(从伦理学和创伤研究的背景下来看)。神学认识论在这里发展,特别关注基督教(坎特伯雷的Anselm,Luther)和当代犹太教(Buber,Levinas)对上帝的认知和知识的局限性,以及对话和第二人称相遇的意义。认识论与感官的解释学相联系,在那里,人类被视为“倾听”某种超越性事物的见证人,这种事物只能基于声学或听觉隐喻来表达,但仍然听不见。关于伦理和宗教生活取向(康德、斯特格迈尔等),倾听被描述为“介于”活动与被动、主体性与交替之间的中等被动。有人认为,听众的个人责任感(Waldenfels)和责任感(Buber,Levinas)仍然反对“共鸣”(Rosa)和没有明确声音的“回声”(Nancy)。在方法论上,作为对话性生活取向的认识论被视为理论-实践反馈回路的一部分,鉴于无法解决的理论张力和富有成效的悖论,这需要耐心、热情的倾听实践,而这些悖论总是能激发进一步的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift
Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Joachim Wiewiura (red.): Den politiske filosofis historie. Frem til 1600 Christine Mundhenk (red.): Melanchthons Briefwechsel, Band T 23: Texte 6691-7056 (1553), hg. von Matthias Dall’ Asta, Heidi Hein, Regine Klar, Christine Mundhenk Holger Villadsen: Kristus- Baggers Alterbog 1688. Forhistorie, indledning og tekstudgave Det er Herren, der styrer en mands gang Fra studienummer til hyrde for en menighed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1