Working conditions and fatigue in log truck drivers within the Japanese forest industry

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1080/14942119.2022.2090180
C. Nakata, A. Itaya, Yuta Inomata, Hirokazu Yamaguchi, C. Yoshida, M. Nakazawa
{"title":"Working conditions and fatigue in log truck drivers within the Japanese forest industry","authors":"C. Nakata, A. Itaya, Yuta Inomata, Hirokazu Yamaguchi, C. Yoshida, M. Nakazawa","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2022.2090180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study clarified the working conditions and fatigue in log truck drivers in Japan’s forestry industry. Log truck drivers in Mie Prefecture, central Japan, were surveyed by questionnaires and interviews. In total, 45 valid responses were obtained from drivers; 24 who worked for transportation firms were defined as “occupational drivers” and 21 who worked for forestry cooperatives or logging companies were defined as “non-occupational drivers.” Many of the responses implied that occupational drivers had poor working conditions, making them prone to fatigue. The average mean driving distance per day of occupational drivers was about three times that of non-occupational drivers. One occupational driver reported a maximum driving distance of 700 km/day. The average mean driving time per day of occupational drivers was about two times that of non-occupational drivers. One occupational driver reported a maximum driving time of 18 h/day. However, many of the answers indicated that non-occupational drivers felt more fatigue; 66.6% had felt tired or exhausted compared to 31.8% of occupational drivers. Two-thirds of occupational drivers answered that log transportation was easier than other transportation driving compared to 4.8% of non-occupational drivers. Many non-occupational drivers (57.1%) felt that log transportation was not easy. It was not a daily task for them, as they usually drove only after logging. The non-occupational drivers felt more nervous driving relatively large trucks and transporting logs compared to the occupational drivers. These results can help inform management in the forestry industry and will contribute to improving drivers’ working environment and reducing fatigue.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2090180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study clarified the working conditions and fatigue in log truck drivers in Japan’s forestry industry. Log truck drivers in Mie Prefecture, central Japan, were surveyed by questionnaires and interviews. In total, 45 valid responses were obtained from drivers; 24 who worked for transportation firms were defined as “occupational drivers” and 21 who worked for forestry cooperatives or logging companies were defined as “non-occupational drivers.” Many of the responses implied that occupational drivers had poor working conditions, making them prone to fatigue. The average mean driving distance per day of occupational drivers was about three times that of non-occupational drivers. One occupational driver reported a maximum driving distance of 700 km/day. The average mean driving time per day of occupational drivers was about two times that of non-occupational drivers. One occupational driver reported a maximum driving time of 18 h/day. However, many of the answers indicated that non-occupational drivers felt more fatigue; 66.6% had felt tired or exhausted compared to 31.8% of occupational drivers. Two-thirds of occupational drivers answered that log transportation was easier than other transportation driving compared to 4.8% of non-occupational drivers. Many non-occupational drivers (57.1%) felt that log transportation was not easy. It was not a daily task for them, as they usually drove only after logging. The non-occupational drivers felt more nervous driving relatively large trucks and transporting logs compared to the occupational drivers. These results can help inform management in the forestry industry and will contribute to improving drivers’ working environment and reducing fatigue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本林业中原木卡车司机的工作条件和疲劳
摘要本研究对日本林业原木卡车司机的工作条件和疲劳状况进行了研究。该研究对日本中部三重县的原木卡车司机进行了问卷调查和访谈。共从司机中获得45份有效回复;在运输公司工作的24人被定义为“职业司机”,在林业合作社或伐木公司工作的21人被定义为“非职业司机”。许多回答暗示,职业司机的工作条件很差,使他们容易疲劳。职业司机的平均每日驾驶距离约为非职业司机的3倍。一名职业司机报告最大驾驶距离为700公里/天。职业司机的平均每日驾驶时间约为非职业司机的两倍。一名职业司机报告最长驾驶时间为18小时/天。然而,许多答案表明,非职业司机感到更疲劳;66.6%的司机感到疲倦或疲惫,而职业司机的比例为31.8%。三分之二的职业司机回答说原木运输比其他交通工具驾驶更容易,而非职业司机的这一比例为4.8%。许多非职业司机(57.1%)认为原木运输不容易。这不是他们的日常工作,因为他们通常只在伐木后开车。与职业司机相比,非职业司机驾驶较大的卡车和运输原木时更紧张。这些结果可以为林业行业的管理提供信息,并有助于改善驾驶员的工作环境和减少疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Productivity benchmarks for unguyed excavator-based tower yarders Novel approach for forest road maintenance using smartphone sensor data and deep learning methods Machine learning applications in forest and biomass supply chain management: a review Mechanical site preparation in South Africa: comparing the productivity of pitting machine operators under different site conditions Stem recovery and harvesting productivity of two different harvesting systems in final felling of Pinus patula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1