The evolution of regulatory practice for CCS projects in Canada

Patricia Larkin, W. Leiss, D. Krewski
{"title":"The evolution of regulatory practice for CCS projects in Canada","authors":"Patricia Larkin, W. Leiss, D. Krewski","doi":"10.1504/ijram.2019.103333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot and demonstration projects began in Canada in the 1990s. This review of publicly available documentation considers the regulatory application and approval practice for four large Canadian projects that are either under construction or in operation. Results find that oversight of CCS projects is value chain specific and obtaining documentation can be challenging. However, technical risk assessment supporting approvals is moving forward, with an increasing range of chain component health and environmental risks being assessed using referenced approaches. Monitoring remains the primary risk management approach. Global risk estimation is not completed and unresolved issues about transparency in risk communication could have the potential to negatively impact broad public acceptance of CCS and therefore project viability in the long run.","PeriodicalId":35420,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/ijram.2019.103333","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2019.103333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot and demonstration projects began in Canada in the 1990s. This review of publicly available documentation considers the regulatory application and approval practice for four large Canadian projects that are either under construction or in operation. Results find that oversight of CCS projects is value chain specific and obtaining documentation can be challenging. However, technical risk assessment supporting approvals is moving forward, with an increasing range of chain component health and environmental risks being assessed using referenced approaches. Monitoring remains the primary risk management approach. Global risk estimation is not completed and unresolved issues about transparency in risk communication could have the potential to negatively impact broad public acceptance of CCS and therefore project viability in the long run.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大CCS项目监管实践的演变
碳捕获和储存(CCS)试点和示范项目始于20世纪90年代的加拿大。对公开文件的审查考虑了四个在建或在运营的加拿大大型项目的监管申请和审批实践。结果发现,CCS项目的监督是特定于价值链的,获取文件可能具有挑战性。然而,支持审批的技术风险评估正在向前推进,越来越多的链组件健康和环境风险正在使用参考方法进行评估。监测仍然是主要的风险管理方法。全球风险评估尚未完成,风险沟通透明度方面尚未解决的问题可能会对公众对CCS的广泛接受产生负面影响,从而从长远来看影响项目的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJRAM is an interdisciplinary and refereed journal that provides cross learning between: - Different business and economics, as well as scientific and technological, disciplines - Energy industries, environmental and ecological systems - Safety, public health and medical services - Software services, reliability and safety
期刊最新文献
A unified fuzzy system for evaluating work related postural risk score of discomfort prone body parts of workers through rapid upper limb assessment Deciding when defence in depth control strategies are necessary for risk management and crisis response Uncertainty and resilience in strategic management: profile of a robust company Prehospital emergency medical treatment teams' competence to act in an AMOK situation On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1