“Signifying Nothing”: Identifying Conceptions of Youth Civic Identity in the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards and the National Assessment of Educational Progress’ Reading Framework

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Berkeley Review of Education Pub Date : 2019-07-17 DOI:10.5070/B88235831
Antero Garcia, Nicole Mirra
{"title":"“Signifying Nothing”: Identifying Conceptions of Youth Civic Identity in the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards and the National Assessment of Educational Progress’ Reading Framework","authors":"Antero Garcia, Nicole Mirra","doi":"10.5070/B88235831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Garcia, Antero; Mirra, Nicole | Abstract: This manuscript examines how national reading policies in the United States shape specific kinds of civic identities for K–12 students. We engage in a thematic discourse analysis of two contemporary national policy documents—the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Framework—to understand the ways citizenship is defined and constructed at the national level. By reading these documents for how they conceptualize civic-based educational outcomes, we interrogate the disconnects between this language and the civic contexts—and potential outlets for civic action—that young people are navigating in the United States today. We examine how seemingly benign policy documents define citizenship in increasingly narrow visions of individualist passivity, and how such definitions run counter to the expansive visions necessary to honor the lived experiences of young citizens of color. Our analysis highlights how these policy documents structure literacy practices, including the variety of texts that students encounter, opportunities to analyze those texts, and specific forms of engagement with media and messages found in society, in ways that stymie a Freirian reading of the word and the world. Ultimately, we suggest how educators might work within the limited pedagogical spaces of these policies toward liberatory ends.","PeriodicalId":42751,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/B88235831","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/B88235831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Author(s): Garcia, Antero; Mirra, Nicole | Abstract: This manuscript examines how national reading policies in the United States shape specific kinds of civic identities for K–12 students. We engage in a thematic discourse analysis of two contemporary national policy documents—the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Framework—to understand the ways citizenship is defined and constructed at the national level. By reading these documents for how they conceptualize civic-based educational outcomes, we interrogate the disconnects between this language and the civic contexts—and potential outlets for civic action—that young people are navigating in the United States today. We examine how seemingly benign policy documents define citizenship in increasingly narrow visions of individualist passivity, and how such definitions run counter to the expansive visions necessary to honor the lived experiences of young citizens of color. Our analysis highlights how these policy documents structure literacy practices, including the variety of texts that students encounter, opportunities to analyze those texts, and specific forms of engagement with media and messages found in society, in ways that stymie a Freirian reading of the word and the world. Ultimately, we suggest how educators might work within the limited pedagogical spaces of these policies toward liberatory ends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“没有意义”:英语语言艺术共同核心国家标准与国家教育进步评估阅读框架中青少年公民认同的概念辨证
作者:Garcia,Antero;Mirra,Nicole|摘要:这份手稿考察了美国的国家阅读政策如何塑造K-12学生的特定公民身份。我们对两份当代国家政策文件——共同核心国家标准(CCSS)和国家教育进步评估(NAEP)阅读框架——进行了主题话语分析,以了解公民身份在国家层面的定义和构建方式。通过阅读这些文件,了解它们如何将基于公民的教育成果概念化,我们质疑了这种语言与当今美国年轻人所处的公民环境——以及公民行动的潜在渠道——之间的脱节。我们研究了看似温和的政策文件如何在日益狭隘的个人主义被动愿景中定义公民身份,以及这些定义如何与尊重有色人种年轻公民的生活经历所必需的广阔愿景背道而驰。我们的分析强调了这些政策文件是如何构建识字实践的,包括学生遇到的各种文本、分析这些文本的机会,以及与社会中的媒体和信息的具体接触形式,这些方式阻碍了弗雷里亚人对这个词和世界的阅读。最终,我们建议教育工作者如何在这些政策的有限教学空间内工作,以达到解放的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Review of Education
Berkeley Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
A tale of two projects: YPAR in and out of school – bounded versus open inquiry A Revised GTCrit Framework: A Broadened Critical Lens for Gifted and Advanced Education Settings Nice to Whom?: How Midwestern Niceness Undermines Educational Equity Racial Control and Student Labor From Youth Activism to Youth-Powered Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1