The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for variant histology bladder cancer: A systematic review

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2021.1994230
M. Álvarez-Maestro, F. Chierigo, G. Mantica, J. Quesada-Olarte, D. Carrion, J. Gómez-Rivas, Álvaro Pinto-Marín, A. Aguilera Bazan, L. Martínez-Piñeiro
{"title":"The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for variant histology bladder cancer: A systematic review","authors":"M. Álvarez-Maestro, F. Chierigo, G. Mantica, J. Quesada-Olarte, D. Carrion, J. Gómez-Rivas, Álvaro Pinto-Marín, A. Aguilera Bazan, L. Martínez-Piñeiro","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2021.1994230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective To systematically review the evidence about the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC) in radical cystectomy (RC) candidates affected by variant histology (VH) bladder cancer. Methods A review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed, Scopus databases in May 2020. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for this systematic review. Keywords used were ‘bladder cancer’, ‘bladder carcinoma’, ‘bladder tumour’ and ‘bladder cancer variants’ and ‘neoadjuvant chemotherapy’. Only original articles in English published after 2000 and reporting oncological outcomes a series of more than five patients with VH were included. We excluded series in which the oncological outcomes of patients with pUC and VH were undistinguishable. Results The literature search identified 2231 articles. A total of 51 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, with 17 eventually considered for systematic review, for a cohort of 450,367 patients, of which 5010 underwent NAC + RC. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 61 to 71 years. Most patients received cisplatin-gemcitabine, methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin, or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Only one study reported results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The median follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months. The results showed that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is less sensitive to NAC than pUC and that SCC predicts poorer prognosis. NAC was found to be a valid approach in treating small cell carcinoma and may have potential benefit in micropapillary carcinoma. Conclusions NAC showed the best oncological outcomes in small cell variants and micropapillary carcinoma, while NAC survival benefit for SCC and adenocarcinoma variants needs further studies. Drawing definite considerations on the efficacy of NAC in VH is complicated due to the heterogeneity of present literature. Present results need to be confirmed in randomised controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1994230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To systematically review the evidence about the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC) in radical cystectomy (RC) candidates affected by variant histology (VH) bladder cancer. Methods A review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed, Scopus databases in May 2020. The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for this systematic review. Keywords used were ‘bladder cancer’, ‘bladder carcinoma’, ‘bladder tumour’ and ‘bladder cancer variants’ and ‘neoadjuvant chemotherapy’. Only original articles in English published after 2000 and reporting oncological outcomes a series of more than five patients with VH were included. We excluded series in which the oncological outcomes of patients with pUC and VH were undistinguishable. Results The literature search identified 2231 articles. A total of 51 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, with 17 eventually considered for systematic review, for a cohort of 450,367 patients, of which 5010 underwent NAC + RC. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 61 to 71 years. Most patients received cisplatin-gemcitabine, methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin, or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Only one study reported results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The median follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months. The results showed that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is less sensitive to NAC than pUC and that SCC predicts poorer prognosis. NAC was found to be a valid approach in treating small cell carcinoma and may have potential benefit in micropapillary carcinoma. Conclusions NAC showed the best oncological outcomes in small cell variants and micropapillary carcinoma, while NAC survival benefit for SCC and adenocarcinoma variants needs further studies. Drawing definite considerations on the efficacy of NAC in VH is complicated due to the heterogeneity of present literature. Present results need to be confirmed in randomised controlled trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助化疗对异型组织学膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者的影响:一项系统综述
【摘要】目的系统回顾新辅助化疗(NAC)对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)合并纯尿路上皮癌(pUC)的根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者合并变异组织学(VH)膀胱癌的疗效。方法于2020年5月通过Medline和国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI) PubMed、Scopus数据库对现有文献进行综述。本系统评价遵循更新后的首选报告项目系统评价和荟萃分析指南。使用的关键词是“膀胱癌”、“膀胱癌”、“膀胱肿瘤”和“膀胱癌变异”以及“新辅助化疗”。仅纳入2000年以后发表的英文原创文章,并报道了5例以上VH患者的肿瘤预后。我们排除了pUC和VH患者的肿瘤预后难以区分的系列。结果共检索到2231篇文献。共有51篇全文文章被评估为合格,其中17篇最终被考虑进行系统评价,涉及450,367例患者,其中5010例接受了NAC + RC。初次诊断时的中位年龄为61至71岁。大多数患者接受顺铂-吉西他滨、甲氨蝶呤-长春碱-阿霉素-顺铂或卡铂为主的化疗。只有一项研究报告了新辅助免疫治疗的结果。中位随访时间为1 ~ 120个月。结果表明,鳞状细胞癌(SCC)对NAC的敏感性低于pUC,且SCC预测预后较差。NAC是治疗小细胞癌的有效方法,对微乳头状癌也有潜在的疗效。结论NAC在小细胞变异体和微乳头状癌中表现出最佳的肿瘤预后,而NAC在SCC和腺癌变异体中的生存获益有待进一步研究。由于目前文献的异质性,明确考虑NAC在VH中的疗效是很复杂的。目前的结果需要在随机对照试验中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic burch colposuspension using sutures versus mesh in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Assessment of stone ablation rate using the Moses technology modes with different energy and pulse settings: An experimental study Mini-PCNL – a boon for CKD patients with nephrolithiasis Sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual of semen analysis: Updates and essential take away for busy clinicians Varicocele and male infertility conundrum: Making sense of a never-ending story for the busy clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1