Health Education Faculty's Perceptions and Practices Regarding Advocacy

F. J. Everhart, E. V. Wasshenova, Rachel Mahas, Diane Kerr, D. Boardley, Amy Thompson
{"title":"Health Education Faculty's Perceptions and Practices Regarding Advocacy","authors":"F. J. Everhart, E. V. Wasshenova, Rachel Mahas, Diane Kerr, D. Boardley, Amy Thompson","doi":"10.47779/ajhs.2015.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this national population study is to assess health education faculty’s perceptions of advocacy related activities and determine their current teaching practices. The study surveyed 1150 health education faculty members regarding their personal involvement in health advocacy, their current teaching practices regarding advocacy and public policy, and their confidence in teaching advocacy and public policy topics. The survey response rate was 50 %. Based on the findings of this study, professional development for faculty members and institutional support for increased training and personal involvement in the areas of advocacy and public policy are highly recommended.\n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":88360,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47779/ajhs.2015.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this national population study is to assess health education faculty’s perceptions of advocacy related activities and determine their current teaching practices. The study surveyed 1150 health education faculty members regarding their personal involvement in health advocacy, their current teaching practices regarding advocacy and public policy, and their confidence in teaching advocacy and public policy topics. The survey response rate was 50 %. Based on the findings of this study, professional development for faculty members and institutional support for increased training and personal involvement in the areas of advocacy and public policy are highly recommended.      
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康教育教师对倡导的认知和实践
这项全国人口研究的目的是评估健康教育教师对宣传相关活动的看法,并确定他们目前的教学实践。这项研究调查了1150名健康教育教员,了解他们个人参与健康倡导的情况,他们目前在倡导和公共政策方面的教学实践,以及他们对教学倡导和公共决策主题的信心。调查回复率为50%。根据这项研究的结果,强烈建议教师的专业发展以及机构支持,以加强宣传和公共政策领域的培训和个人参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Coterminous of COVID-19 Case and Vaccination Centers in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana Factors Associated with Condom Use among Community College Students Symptom Screenings and Surveillance Testing for COVID-19 in University Athletes Exploring Career Motivations and Concerns of Registered Nurses in New York State Exploring the Motivations of Nursing Students in New York State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1