Co-text and critical reading for international postgraduates in Australia

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.2989/16073614.2022.2064318
A. Zaini
{"title":"Co-text and critical reading for international postgraduates in Australia","authors":"A. Zaini","doi":"10.2989/16073614.2022.2064318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research article reports on a study that investigated the associations between co-text and reading texts critically. Four international postgraduates at an Australian university, through purposive sampling, volunteered in a qualitative study (i.e. a collective case study). Data collection involved reading four texts, participating in individual interviews, and focus group discussions, while data analysis was executed through a thematic analysis which yielded co-text as a main theme. Co-text was subsequently studied through Foucault’s theories of discourse, subjectivities, the power-knowledge complex and resistance. The findings propose that there are associations between co-text, meaning construction and critical reading. Participants’ cognisance of co-text, owing to their academic and political identities, informed meaning construction and led them to resist text ideas for potential co-text manipulation and what was reported as deliberate inadequate information. Pedagogically, this study suggests that teachers explicitly instruct students on the workings of co-text when reading texts critically.","PeriodicalId":54152,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"353 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2064318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This research article reports on a study that investigated the associations between co-text and reading texts critically. Four international postgraduates at an Australian university, through purposive sampling, volunteered in a qualitative study (i.e. a collective case study). Data collection involved reading four texts, participating in individual interviews, and focus group discussions, while data analysis was executed through a thematic analysis which yielded co-text as a main theme. Co-text was subsequently studied through Foucault’s theories of discourse, subjectivities, the power-knowledge complex and resistance. The findings propose that there are associations between co-text, meaning construction and critical reading. Participants’ cognisance of co-text, owing to their academic and political identities, informed meaning construction and led them to resist text ideas for potential co-text manipulation and what was reported as deliberate inadequate information. Pedagogically, this study suggests that teachers explicitly instruct students on the workings of co-text when reading texts critically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚国际研究生的合作文本与批评性阅读
摘要这篇研究文章报道了一项研究,调查了合作文本和批判性阅读文本之间的联系。澳大利亚一所大学的四名国际研究生通过有目的的抽样,自愿参加了一项定性研究(即集体案例研究)。数据收集包括阅读四篇文章、参加个人访谈和焦点小组讨论,而数据分析是通过主题分析进行的,以共文为主要主题。随后通过福柯的话语理论、主体性理论、权力知识情结理论和反抗理论对共文本进行了研究。研究结果表明,共文本、意义建构和批判性阅读之间存在关联。由于参与者的学术和政治身份,他们对共文本的认知为意义构建提供了信息,并导致他们抵制潜在的共文本操纵的文本想法和被报道为故意不足的信息。从教学学角度来看,这项研究表明,教师在批判性阅读课文时,明确地指导学生共同课文的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies publishes articles on a wide range of linguistic topics and acts as a forum for research into ALL the languages of southern Africa, including English and Afrikaans. Original contributions are welcomed on any of the core areas of linguistics, both theoretical (e.g. syntax, phonology, semantics) and applied (e.g. sociolinguistic topics, language teaching, language policy). Review articles, short research reports and book reviews are also welcomed. Articles in languages other than English are accompanied by an extended English summary.
期刊最新文献
Handling bad news in a male reproductive health clinic: a speech act perspective Death euphemisms on tombstones: A case of the Vhavenḓa’s metaphorical conceptualisation of death Police interviews in a non-native context: Misconstructions and possible solutions Isocolon in EDM Sibiya’s novels: A stylo-syntactic evaluation A semantic-pragmatic deconstruction of Blinding Lights by The Weeknd and Bad Guy by Billie Eilish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1