Article: The Distorting Effects of Imputation Systems on Tax Competition in the EU

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW Intertax Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023021
Christoph Spengel, L. Fischer, Jessica M. Müller
{"title":"Article: The Distorting Effects of Imputation Systems on Tax Competition in the EU","authors":"Christoph Spengel, L. Fischer, Jessica M. Müller","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design of corporate income tax systems and thus the taxation of (cross-border) dividends are encompassed within the sovereignty of the Member States of the European Union (EU). However, these rules are restricted by the EU regulatory framework and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which prohibit discrimination of foreign- against domestic-sourced dividends. Therefore, five EU Member States abolished their discriminatory imputation systems in favour of shareholder relief systems between 1999 and 2019 which had not only legal but also economic implications. In this simulation study, the authors assess how and to what extent the abolishment of discriminatory imputation systems in the EU Member States affected a country’s tax location attractiveness for capital investments and tax competition. The analysis is based on the cost of capital (CoC) and effective average tax rates (EATR) using the Devereux/Griffith methodology. Overall, under the discriminatory imputation systems, the authors find lower CoC and EATR for investments located in the shareholder’s residence country compared to foreign investment alternatives. The advantageousness is, on average, reversed after the switch to the shareholder relief systems and places additional tax competition pressure on the affected Member States.\nCorporate tax systems, Dividend taxation, Devereux/Griffith methodology, European Court of Justice, Internal market, Effective tax rates, Cost of capital JEL classification: H21, H24, H25, K34","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of corporate income tax systems and thus the taxation of (cross-border) dividends are encompassed within the sovereignty of the Member States of the European Union (EU). However, these rules are restricted by the EU regulatory framework and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which prohibit discrimination of foreign- against domestic-sourced dividends. Therefore, five EU Member States abolished their discriminatory imputation systems in favour of shareholder relief systems between 1999 and 2019 which had not only legal but also economic implications. In this simulation study, the authors assess how and to what extent the abolishment of discriminatory imputation systems in the EU Member States affected a country’s tax location attractiveness for capital investments and tax competition. The analysis is based on the cost of capital (CoC) and effective average tax rates (EATR) using the Devereux/Griffith methodology. Overall, under the discriminatory imputation systems, the authors find lower CoC and EATR for investments located in the shareholder’s residence country compared to foreign investment alternatives. The advantageousness is, on average, reversed after the switch to the shareholder relief systems and places additional tax competition pressure on the affected Member States. Corporate tax systems, Dividend taxation, Devereux/Griffith methodology, European Court of Justice, Internal market, Effective tax rates, Cost of capital JEL classification: H21, H24, H25, K34
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章:欧盟税收竞争中有罪不罚制度的扭曲效应
公司所得税制度的设计以及(跨境)股息的征税都属于欧洲联盟(欧盟)成员国的主权范围。然而,这些规则受到欧盟监管框架和欧洲法院判例法的限制,这些判例法禁止歧视外国来源的股息和国内来源的股息。因此,在1999年至2019年间,五个欧盟成员国废除了歧视性的归责制度,转而采用股东救济制度,这不仅具有法律影响,而且具有经济影响。在这项模拟研究中,作者评估了欧盟成员国废除歧视性插补制度如何以及在多大程度上影响一个国家对资本投资和税收竞争的税收区位吸引力。该分析基于使用Devereux/Griffith方法的资本成本(CoC)和有效平均税率(EATR)。总体而言,在歧视性归责制度下,作者发现,与外国投资替代方案相比,位于股东居住国的投资的CoC和EATR更低。平均而言,在转向股东救济制度后,这种优势被逆转,并给受影响的成员国带来额外的税收竞争压力。公司税收制度、股息税、Devereux/Griffith方法、欧洲法院、内部市场、有效税率、资本成本JEL分类:H21、H24、H25、K34
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
(In)congruence Between Taxation, Spending, and Representation: The Ambiguous Character of Tax-based Contributions Taxing Powers of the European Union Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ Protecting EU Financial Interests in the Collection of Tax-Based Own Resources Article: Conflicts between Directives that Require Taxation of Income and Tax Treaties: The Effectiveness of the EU Primacy-based Conflict Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1