Analyzing the Mutual Geopolitical and Security Complementarity of Iran and Turkey: Border, Energy, and Water

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1080/19448953.2023.2167182
A. Omidi, Hande Orhon Özdağ
{"title":"Analyzing the Mutual Geopolitical and Security Complementarity of Iran and Turkey: Border, Energy, and Water","authors":"A. Omidi, Hande Orhon Özdağ","doi":"10.1080/19448953.2023.2167182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent decades, particularly since 2002, relations between Iran and Turkey have been on the rise and generally expanding. The aim of this paper is to analyse and clarify the reasons for the sustainability of the two countries’ relations while undergoing intermittent eruptions of disputes over the years. In other words, the main question is: why have Iran and Turkey, with their political frictions, routinely embraced rapprochement and collaboration in recent decades? Accordingly, the hypothesis proposed is that a key reason for the ongoing cooperation between Tehran and Ankara in different fields, is the rationale of geopolitical complementarity engendering their security needs in broad meaning, particularly energy security and natural gas. Whilst the logic also applies to water security, both states attach greater importance to border security and energy. In short, their common geopolitical destiny over-rides individual state preferences. To examine this hypothesis, Barry Buzan’s theory based on a broad definition of security as well as regional security complex has been deployed through descriptive analytics.","PeriodicalId":45789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"923 - 943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent decades, particularly since 2002, relations between Iran and Turkey have been on the rise and generally expanding. The aim of this paper is to analyse and clarify the reasons for the sustainability of the two countries’ relations while undergoing intermittent eruptions of disputes over the years. In other words, the main question is: why have Iran and Turkey, with their political frictions, routinely embraced rapprochement and collaboration in recent decades? Accordingly, the hypothesis proposed is that a key reason for the ongoing cooperation between Tehran and Ankara in different fields, is the rationale of geopolitical complementarity engendering their security needs in broad meaning, particularly energy security and natural gas. Whilst the logic also applies to water security, both states attach greater importance to border security and energy. In short, their common geopolitical destiny over-rides individual state preferences. To examine this hypothesis, Barry Buzan’s theory based on a broad definition of security as well as regional security complex has been deployed through descriptive analytics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析伊朗和土耳其的地缘政治和安全互补性:边界、能源和水
近几十年来,特别是自2002年以来,伊朗和土耳其的关系一直在上升,并普遍扩大。本文的目的是分析和澄清两国关系的可持续性的原因,而经历断断续续爆发的争端多年来。换句话说,主要的问题是:为什么伊朗和土耳其在近几十年的政治摩擦中,经常接受和解与合作?因此,所提出的假设是,德黑兰和安卡拉在不同领域进行合作的一个关键原因是地缘政治上的互补性产生了它们广泛意义上的安全需要,特别是能源安全和天然气。虽然这一逻辑也适用于水安全,但两国都更加重视边境安全和能源。简而言之,它们共同的地缘政治命运凌驾于单个国家的偏好之上。为了检验这一假设,巴里·布赞的理论基于广泛的安全定义以及区域安全综合体,并通过描述性分析进行了部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
2023 Elections in Turkey within Global Context: Right Wing Populism in the Era of Global Shift Turkish Humanitarian Assistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focus on Africa Summitry Diplomacy in Turkey–Africa Relations: Statements, (Non-)Accomplishments and Effectiveness Turkey-Africa Relations and Turkey’s National Role Conception as the Centre Country: Continuity or a Break with the Past? Autonomy and Control in the Gig Economy and Platform Work: Domestic and Home Repair Workers in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1