Tillage and crop rotation effects on soil carbon and selected soil physical properties in a Haplic Cambisol in Eastern Cape, South Africa

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Soil and Water Research Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI:10.17221/176/2018-SWR
Mxolisi Mtyobile, L. Muzangwa, P. Mnkeni
{"title":"Tillage and crop rotation effects on soil carbon and selected soil physical properties in a Haplic Cambisol in Eastern Cape, South Africa","authors":"Mxolisi Mtyobile, L. Muzangwa, P. Mnkeni","doi":"10.17221/176/2018-SWR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of tillage and crop rotation on the soil carbon, the soil bulk density, the porosity and the soil water content were evaluated during the 6th season of an on-going field trial at the University of Fort Hare Farm (UFH), South Africa. Two tillage systems; conventional tillage (CT) and no-till and crop rotations; maize (Zea mays L.)-fallow-maize (MFM), maize-fallow-soybean (Glycine max L.) (MFS); maize-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (MWM) and maize-wheat-soybean (MWS) were evaluated. The field experiment was a 2 × 4 factorial, laid out in a randomised complete design. The crop residues were retained for the no-till plots and incorporated for the CT plots, after each cropping season. No significant effects (P > 0.05) of the tillage and crop rotation on the bulk density were observed. However, the values ranged from 1.32 to1.37 g/cm3. Significant interaction effects of the tillage and crop rotation were observed on the soil porosity (P < 0.01) and the soil water content (P < 0.05). The porosity for the MFM and the MWS, was higher under the CT whereas for the MWM and the MWS, it was higher under the no-till. However, the greatest porosity was under the MWS. Whilst the no-till significantly increased (P < 0.05) the soil water content compared to the CT; the greatest soil water content was observed when the no-till was combined with the MWM rotations. The soil organic carbon (SOC) was increased more (P < 0.05) by the no-till than the CT, and the MFM consistently had the least SOC compared with the rest of the crop rotations, at all the sampling depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm). The soil bulk density negatively correlated with the soil porosity and the soil water content, whereas the porosity positively correlated with the soil water content. The study concluded that the crop rotations, the MWM and the MWS under the no-till coupled with the residue retention improved the soil porosity and the soil water content levels the most.","PeriodicalId":48982,"journal":{"name":"Soil and Water Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17221/176/2018-SWR","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil and Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/176/2018-SWR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The effects of tillage and crop rotation on the soil carbon, the soil bulk density, the porosity and the soil water content were evaluated during the 6th season of an on-going field trial at the University of Fort Hare Farm (UFH), South Africa. Two tillage systems; conventional tillage (CT) and no-till and crop rotations; maize (Zea mays L.)-fallow-maize (MFM), maize-fallow-soybean (Glycine max L.) (MFS); maize-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (MWM) and maize-wheat-soybean (MWS) were evaluated. The field experiment was a 2 × 4 factorial, laid out in a randomised complete design. The crop residues were retained for the no-till plots and incorporated for the CT plots, after each cropping season. No significant effects (P > 0.05) of the tillage and crop rotation on the bulk density were observed. However, the values ranged from 1.32 to1.37 g/cm3. Significant interaction effects of the tillage and crop rotation were observed on the soil porosity (P < 0.01) and the soil water content (P < 0.05). The porosity for the MFM and the MWS, was higher under the CT whereas for the MWM and the MWS, it was higher under the no-till. However, the greatest porosity was under the MWS. Whilst the no-till significantly increased (P < 0.05) the soil water content compared to the CT; the greatest soil water content was observed when the no-till was combined with the MWM rotations. The soil organic carbon (SOC) was increased more (P < 0.05) by the no-till than the CT, and the MFM consistently had the least SOC compared with the rest of the crop rotations, at all the sampling depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm). The soil bulk density negatively correlated with the soil porosity and the soil water content, whereas the porosity positively correlated with the soil water content. The study concluded that the crop rotations, the MWM and the MWS under the no-till coupled with the residue retention improved the soil porosity and the soil water content levels the most.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耕作和轮作对南非东开普省Haplic Cambisol土壤碳和部分土壤物理性质的影响
在南非Fort Hare大学农场(UFH)正在进行的一项田间试验的第六季中,评估了耕作和轮作对土壤碳、土壤容重、孔隙度和土壤含水量的影响。两种耕作系统;常规耕作和免耕轮作;玉米(Zea mays L.)-休耕玉米(MFM)、玉米休耕大豆(Glycine max L.)(MFS);对玉米-小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)-玉米(MWM)和玉米-小麦-大豆(MWS)进行了评价。现场实验是一个2×4的因子,采用随机完全设计。作物残留物保留在免耕地块中,并在每个种植季节后纳入CT地块。耕作和轮作对松密度的影响不显著(P>0.05)。然而,数值范围为1.32至1.37 g/cm3。耕作和轮作对土壤孔隙度(P<0.01)和土壤含水量(P<0.05)有显著的交互作用。然而,最大的孔隙率是在MWS下。免耕显著提高了土壤含水量(P<0.05);当免耕与MWM轮作相结合时,土壤含水量最大。免耕对土壤有机碳(SOC)的增加大于CT(P<0.05),并且在所有采样深度(0-5、5-10和10-20 cm),与其他轮作相比,MFM始终具有最低的SOC。土壤容重与土壤孔隙度和土壤含水量呈负相关,而孔隙度与土壤含水量呈正相关。研究表明,轮作、免耕下的MWM和MWS结合留渣对土壤孔隙度和土壤含水量的改善最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil and Water Research
Soil and Water Research Water resources, Soil Science, Agriculture-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An international peer-reviewed journal published under the auspices of the Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences and financed by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Published since 2006. Thematic: original papers, short communications and critical reviews from all fields of science and engineering related to soil and water and their interactions in natural and man-modified landscapes, with a particular focus on agricultural land use. The fields encompassed include, but are not limited to, the basic and applied soil science, soil hydrology, irrigation and drainage of lands, hydrology, management and revitalisation of small water streams and small water reservoirs, including fishponds, soil erosion research and control, drought and flood control, wetland restoration and protection, surface and ground water protection in therms of their quantity and quality.
期刊最新文献
Soil pore structure and its research methods: A review Assessing soil aggregate stability by measuring light transmission decrease during aggregate disintegration Changes in soil properties due to land reclamation and climate change in South Moravian floodplain forest Changes in grassland area in lowlands and marginal uplands: Medium-term differences and potential for carbon farming Soil organic matter quality of variously managed agricultural soil in the Czech Republic evaluated using DRIFT spectroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1