The limits of the narratives of strategy: three stories from the history of music retail

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2021.1878042
Kevin D. Tennent, Simon Mollan
{"title":"The limits of the narratives of strategy: three stories from the history of music retail","authors":"Kevin D. Tennent, Simon Mollan","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2021.1878042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of narrative framing in the perception of strategic success by exploring the construction of notions of strategy in relation to the perspective of different actors in the same historical episode. Our article is about the UK music retailing industry from the late 1950s until the present. We narrate three stories/accounts – one focusing on the perspective of larger firms in the industry, acting as a normative business history narration, one focusing on the perspective of the mass of smaller firms attempting to survive as larger competitors expand, and one–an epilogue–looking at the recent past in which some of the smaller firms managed to survive while many of the dominant firms from the 1980s and 1990s have failed. We use this both to construct a more diverse historiography of the music retail industry in Britain while advancing the theoretical contribution that narratives of strategic success and failure often favor conceptualizations of dominance over resistance, while failing to reflect on the extent to which historical research itself is an act of sense-making that is bounded by periodization and theoretical priors.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2021.1878042","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2021.1878042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of narrative framing in the perception of strategic success by exploring the construction of notions of strategy in relation to the perspective of different actors in the same historical episode. Our article is about the UK music retailing industry from the late 1950s until the present. We narrate three stories/accounts – one focusing on the perspective of larger firms in the industry, acting as a normative business history narration, one focusing on the perspective of the mass of smaller firms attempting to survive as larger competitors expand, and one–an epilogue–looking at the recent past in which some of the smaller firms managed to survive while many of the dominant firms from the 1980s and 1990s have failed. We use this both to construct a more diverse historiography of the music retail industry in Britain while advancing the theoretical contribution that narratives of strategic success and failure often favor conceptualizations of dominance over resistance, while failing to reflect on the extent to which historical research itself is an act of sense-making that is bounded by periodization and theoretical priors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略叙事的局限:音乐零售史上的三个故事
摘要本文通过在同一历史事件中不同行为者的视角下探讨战略概念的建构,探讨叙事框架在战略成功感知中的作用。我们的文章是关于英国音乐零售业从20世纪50年代末到现在。我们讲述了三个故事/叙述——一个聚焦于行业中大公司的视角,作为规范的商业历史叙述,一个聚焦于在更大的竞争对手扩张时试图生存的大量小公司的视角,一个是尾声——着眼于最近的过去,其中一些小公司设法生存下来,而许多20世纪80年代和90年代的主导公司都失败了。我们利用这两方面来构建英国音乐零售行业更多样化的史学,同时推进理论贡献,即战略成功和失败的叙述往往倾向于支配而不是抵抗的概念化,同时未能反映历史研究本身在多大程度上是一种受分期和理论先验限制的意义建构行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
The history of entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom: 1860-2020 Family entrepreneurs and their next generations, 1809–1945: educational pathways of business elite in Finland Who watches the watchdogs? Central bank board members and banking supervisors in Switzerland (1907–2008) Informing the ontologies of organizational histories: the critical conceptualization of events and actualization in organizing Who determined the rules of the game in the Spanish financial reforms, 1970-1990?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1