Is computer-mediated communication more powerful than face-to-face discussion in mobilizing political participation? A study examines participation in electoral campaigns and political advocacy in Taiwan

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2022.2084483
Jing Guo
{"title":"Is computer-mediated communication more powerful than face-to-face discussion in mobilizing political participation? A study examines participation in electoral campaigns and political advocacy in Taiwan","authors":"Jing Guo","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2022.2084483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using a representative Taiwan sample from the 2019 Asia Barometer Survey, this study investigated the effect of political interest on two types of political participation (i.e., participation in electoral campaigns and political advocacy) based on the communication mediation model. Findings showed that three communication channels (i.e., news involvement, on-line political expression, and off-line political discussion) mediate the positive relationship between political interest and participation through different paths. When people are more interested in politics, they will be more likely to read political news, leading to more on-line political expression, which then motivates higher level of political participation. In parallel, political interest could also increase political participation first through news involvement and then through off-line political discussion. More importantly, compared with the total indirect effects on participation in electoral campaigns, political interest could exert stronger indirect effect on participation in political advocacy through the three communication channels under study. In addition, the mediating effect of on-line political expression is more powerful than off-line political discussion in mobilizing participation in political advocacy. However, in terms of participation in electoral campaigns, indirect effect through on-line and off-line communication showed no significant difference. Implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"20 1","pages":"235 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2084483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using a representative Taiwan sample from the 2019 Asia Barometer Survey, this study investigated the effect of political interest on two types of political participation (i.e., participation in electoral campaigns and political advocacy) based on the communication mediation model. Findings showed that three communication channels (i.e., news involvement, on-line political expression, and off-line political discussion) mediate the positive relationship between political interest and participation through different paths. When people are more interested in politics, they will be more likely to read political news, leading to more on-line political expression, which then motivates higher level of political participation. In parallel, political interest could also increase political participation first through news involvement and then through off-line political discussion. More importantly, compared with the total indirect effects on participation in electoral campaigns, political interest could exert stronger indirect effect on participation in political advocacy through the three communication channels under study. In addition, the mediating effect of on-line political expression is more powerful than off-line political discussion in mobilizing participation in political advocacy. However, in terms of participation in electoral campaigns, indirect effect through on-line and off-line communication showed no significant difference. Implications of the findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在动员政治参与方面,以电脑为媒介的交流是否比面对面的讨论更有力?一项研究调查了台湾竞选活动和政治宣传的参与情况
摘要本研究采用2019年亚洲晴雨表调查中具有代表性的台湾样本,基于沟通调解模型,研究了政治利益对两种政治参与(即参与竞选和政治倡导)的影响。研究结果表明,三种传播渠道(即新闻参与、在线政治表达和离线政治讨论)通过不同的途径介导政治利益与参与之间的积极关系。当人们对政治更感兴趣时,他们将更有可能阅读政治新闻,从而产生更多的在线政治表达,从而激发更高水平的政治参与。与此同时,政治利益也可以通过新闻参与,然后通过离线政治讨论来增加政治参与。更重要的是,与对参与竞选活动的总体间接影响相比,政治利益可以通过所研究的三个沟通渠道对参与政治宣传产生更强的间接影响。此外,在线政治表达在动员政治倡导参与方面的中介作用比离线政治讨论更为强大。然而,在参与竞选活动方面,通过在线和离线交流的间接效果没有显著差异。讨论了研究结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1