LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool for careers and employability learning: a scoping review of the literature

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Training Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1108/et-01-2022-0004
M. Healy, S. Cochrane, P. Grant, Marita Basson
{"title":"LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool for careers and employability learning: a scoping review of the literature","authors":"M. Healy, S. Cochrane, P. Grant, Marita Basson","doi":"10.1108/et-01-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeProfessional networks are conduits for career insight, vehicles for career exploration and incubators of professional identity. Accordingly, LinkedIn is a rich environment for university students' careers and employability learning. In this article, the authors review how the pedagogical use of LinkedIn has been conceived, implemented and evaluated in higher education research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a scoping literature review on research articles and chapters investigating the use of LinkedIn for careers and employability learning. The authors conducted a systematic database search and screened the results, resulting in 30 eligible studies. Each study was analysed for research characteristics, theoretical foundations, reported affordances or outcomes and critical concerns.FindingsThe authors find little evidence of cohesion or consistency in the existing research. Studies draw on different theoretical and methodological approaches and use different measures of networking behaviours and competencies. Studies tend not to consider ethical concerns about using LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool.Practical implicationsThe authors argue this is not yet a body of research that supports the synthesis necessary for a reliable evidence base. The authors recommend that educators employing LinkedIn in the curriculum ground their work in more coherent, cohesive and integrated theories of careers and employability learning.Originality/valueThis review summarises a body of literature on the use of LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool for careers and employability learning in higher education. This review describes and critiques the beginnings of an evidence-base from which educators can further investigate how students can be supported to develop their online professional networking skills.","PeriodicalId":47994,"journal":{"name":"Education and Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-01-2022-0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeProfessional networks are conduits for career insight, vehicles for career exploration and incubators of professional identity. Accordingly, LinkedIn is a rich environment for university students' careers and employability learning. In this article, the authors review how the pedagogical use of LinkedIn has been conceived, implemented and evaluated in higher education research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a scoping literature review on research articles and chapters investigating the use of LinkedIn for careers and employability learning. The authors conducted a systematic database search and screened the results, resulting in 30 eligible studies. Each study was analysed for research characteristics, theoretical foundations, reported affordances or outcomes and critical concerns.FindingsThe authors find little evidence of cohesion or consistency in the existing research. Studies draw on different theoretical and methodological approaches and use different measures of networking behaviours and competencies. Studies tend not to consider ethical concerns about using LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool.Practical implicationsThe authors argue this is not yet a body of research that supports the synthesis necessary for a reliable evidence base. The authors recommend that educators employing LinkedIn in the curriculum ground their work in more coherent, cohesive and integrated theories of careers and employability learning.Originality/valueThis review summarises a body of literature on the use of LinkedIn as a pedagogical tool for careers and employability learning in higher education. This review describes and critiques the beginnings of an evidence-base from which educators can further investigate how students can be supported to develop their online professional networking skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LinkedIn作为职业和就业能力学习的教学工具:文献综述
目的专业网络是职业洞察力的渠道、职业探索的工具和职业身份的孵化器。因此,领英为大学生的职业生涯和就业能力学习提供了一个丰富的环境。在这篇文章中,作者回顾了领英在高等教育研究中的教学使用是如何构思、实施和评估的。设计/方法论/方法作者对调查LinkedIn用于职业和就业能力学习的研究文章和章节进行了范围界定文献综述。作者进行了系统的数据库搜索并筛选了结果,得出了30项符合条件的研究。对每项研究的研究特征、理论基础、报告的可供性或结果以及关键问题进行了分析。发现作者在现有的研究中几乎没有发现衔接或一致性的证据。研究采用了不同的理论和方法,并使用了不同的网络行为和能力衡量标准。研究倾向于不考虑使用领英作为教学工具的道德问题。实际含义作者认为,这还不是一个支持可靠证据基础所需综合的研究机构。作者建议在课程中使用领英的教育工作者将他们的工作建立在更连贯、更有凝聚力和综合性的职业和就业能力学习理论之上。原创性/价值这篇综述总结了大量关于在高等教育中使用领英作为职业和就业能力学习的教学工具的文献。这篇综述描述并批评了一个证据库的开端,教育工作者可以从中进一步调查如何支持学生发展他们的在线专业网络技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Training
Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Education + Training addresses the increasingly complex relationships between education, training and employment and the impact of these relationships on national and global labour markets. The journal gives specific consideration to young people, looking at how the transition from school/college to employment is achieved and how the nature of partnerships between the worlds of education and work continues to evolve. The journal explores vocationalism in learning and efforts to address employability within the curriculum, together with coverage of innovative themes and initiatives within vocational education and training. The journal is read by policy makers, educators and academics working in a wide range of fields including education, learning and skills development, enterprise and entrepreneurship education and training, induction and career development. Coverage: Managing the transition from school/college to work New initiatives in post 16 vocational education and training Education-Business partnerships and collaboration Links between education and industry The graduate labour market Work experience and placements The recruitment, induction and development of school leavers and graduates Young person employability and career development E learning in further and higher education Research news Reviews of recent publications.
期刊最新文献
Education and training for industry 4.0: a case study of a manufacturing ecosystem Block scheduling for LARC in a family medicine residency program Creating a Virtual Palliative Care Curriculum for Family Medicine Residents The Association between Residency Characteristics and Graduates Caring for Pregnant People: An FM-ROP Study Graduating Medical Students’ Knowledge Compared to Their Confidence in Treating Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1