Grumpy Old Men: reconsidering Rational Choice & Political Power

IF 1.3 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Political Power Pub Date : 2021-03-28 DOI:10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901196
J. Johnson
{"title":"Grumpy Old Men: reconsidering Rational Choice & Political Power","authors":"J. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A new, expanded edition of Keith Dowding’s Rational Choice & Political Power (PC&PP) provides an opportunity to examine the uses of game theoretic models in political inquiry. Specifically, it raises questions about the apparent discontinuities between the way bargaining models are used in RC&PP and the way he defends formal models in more recent work. I prefer what I take to be his earlier view.","PeriodicalId":45560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Power","volume":"14 1","pages":"313 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901196","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT A new, expanded edition of Keith Dowding’s Rational Choice & Political Power (PC&PP) provides an opportunity to examine the uses of game theoretic models in political inquiry. Specifically, it raises questions about the apparent discontinuities between the way bargaining models are used in RC&PP and the way he defends formal models in more recent work. I prefer what I take to be his earlier view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脾气暴躁的老人:理性选择与政治权力的再思考
基思·道丁的《理性选择与政治权力》(PC&PP)的新扩充版为研究博弈论模型在政治探究中的应用提供了机会。具体来说,它提出了一个问题,即在RC&PP中使用的讨价还价模型的方式与他在最近的工作中为正式模型辩护的方式之间存在明显的不连续性。我更喜欢他早期的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Power
Journal of Political Power POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Body, heart, mind and soul: power and personhood in an impersonal world Unlocking the whole of soft power: a quantum international relations analysis Bauman, Z (2023) history and politics selected writings, volume 2, edited and with an introduction Aesthetic resistance: publicness, potentiality, and plexus. Understanding insurgency: popular support for the PKK in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1