{"title":"The Two Courses of Development of the Category “Smysl” in L. S. Vygotsky’s Works","authors":"Ekaterina Yu. Zavershneva","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article analyzes the background and dynamics of Lev S. Vygotsky’s notions of smysl (“sense,” “meaning,” “significance,” “purpose,” “essence”—all in one). Drawing on the data of archival records, the author has reconstructed the two main courses taken by the category “smysl” in its development: (1) within the bounds of a field metaphor, also used in the development of the “meaningful field” construct, and (2) as part of the interpretation of smysl as an integral characteristic of man’s attitude to the external world. Vygotsky’s theoretical projects are being compared to the experimental studies of his team conducted in the early 1930s. The author demonstrates that the discursive field of Vygotsky’s conception, which was determined by the category “smysl,” had a complex composition and was defined via a dialogue with K. Lewin’s field theory, using the method of formal-dynamic analysis and experimental techniques developed in the framework of dynamic psychology.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"303 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2000313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The article analyzes the background and dynamics of Lev S. Vygotsky’s notions of smysl (“sense,” “meaning,” “significance,” “purpose,” “essence”—all in one). Drawing on the data of archival records, the author has reconstructed the two main courses taken by the category “smysl” in its development: (1) within the bounds of a field metaphor, also used in the development of the “meaningful field” construct, and (2) as part of the interpretation of smysl as an integral characteristic of man’s attitude to the external world. Vygotsky’s theoretical projects are being compared to the experimental studies of his team conducted in the early 1930s. The author demonstrates that the discursive field of Vygotsky’s conception, which was determined by the category “smysl,” had a complex composition and was defined via a dialogue with K. Lewin’s field theory, using the method of formal-dynamic analysis and experimental techniques developed in the framework of dynamic psychology.
期刊介绍:
Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.