S. Parhizgar, Milad Vahedinezhad, Tahereh Yari, Bahareh Mohajer, Zohre Maghsoudloo, Parham Sadeghipour, A. Mozayanimonfared, Z. Hosseini, M. Maleki, A. Firouzi, M. Alemzadeh-Ansari, Zahra Hosseini, A. Rashidinejad
{"title":"Discharge against medical advice in patients with acute coronary syndrome during the COVID-19 outbreak","authors":"S. Parhizgar, Milad Vahedinezhad, Tahereh Yari, Bahareh Mohajer, Zohre Maghsoudloo, Parham Sadeghipour, A. Mozayanimonfared, Z. Hosseini, M. Maleki, A. Firouzi, M. Alemzadeh-Ansari, Zahra Hosseini, A. Rashidinejad","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_23_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients' hesitation to seek medical care has seriously compromised the management of acute coronary syndrome during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. In the present study, we have reported the rate of discharged against medical advice (DAMA) among patients referred to chest pain unit (CPU) of a tertiary cardiovascular center and compared their clinical outcomes with whom admitted or managed conservatively. Methods: Patients with modified HEART risk score ≥4 referred to the CPU were included in the present study. Population requiring CPU admission due to positive serial troponin were divided into admitted and DAMA groups. Patients with negative serial troponin were managed as outpatient (conservative treatment group). 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were compared between the study groups. Results: A modified HEART risk score (≥4) was calculated for 440 of 5490 patients visited our CPU. One hundred and one (22.9%), 80 (18.1%), and 249 (56.5%) patients were categorized as DAMA, admitted, and conservative treatment groups, respectively. Myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the DAMA versus admitted group (2 vs. 0; P ≤ 0.001). MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the DAMA group than that in the conservative treatment group (5 vs. 2; P = 0.02 and 4 vs. 2; P = 0.055, respectively). Conclusion: In the present study, we have demonstrated a considerable rate of DAMA in patients with high modified HEART risk score referring to CPU during the COVID-19 outbreak. Importantly, the DAMA group experienced a higher incidence rate of 30-day MACE and all-cause mortality compared to patients who were admitted or managed conservatively.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"79 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_23_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients' hesitation to seek medical care has seriously compromised the management of acute coronary syndrome during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. In the present study, we have reported the rate of discharged against medical advice (DAMA) among patients referred to chest pain unit (CPU) of a tertiary cardiovascular center and compared their clinical outcomes with whom admitted or managed conservatively. Methods: Patients with modified HEART risk score ≥4 referred to the CPU were included in the present study. Population requiring CPU admission due to positive serial troponin were divided into admitted and DAMA groups. Patients with negative serial troponin were managed as outpatient (conservative treatment group). 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were compared between the study groups. Results: A modified HEART risk score (≥4) was calculated for 440 of 5490 patients visited our CPU. One hundred and one (22.9%), 80 (18.1%), and 249 (56.5%) patients were categorized as DAMA, admitted, and conservative treatment groups, respectively. Myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the DAMA versus admitted group (2 vs. 0; P ≤ 0.001). MACE and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the DAMA group than that in the conservative treatment group (5 vs. 2; P = 0.02 and 4 vs. 2; P = 0.055, respectively). Conclusion: In the present study, we have demonstrated a considerable rate of DAMA in patients with high modified HEART risk score referring to CPU during the COVID-19 outbreak. Importantly, the DAMA group experienced a higher incidence rate of 30-day MACE and all-cause mortality compared to patients who were admitted or managed conservatively.
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)暴发期间,患者就医犹豫严重影响了急性冠状动脉综合征的管理。在本研究中,我们报道了三级心血管中心胸痛科(CPU)患者的不遵医嘱出院率(DAMA),并将其临床结果与入院或保守治疗的患者进行了比较。方法:采用改良心脏风险评分≥4分(CPU)的患者纳入本研究。因系列肌钙蛋白阳性而需要CPU入院的人群分为入院组和DAMA组。系列肌钙蛋白阴性患者作为门诊治疗(保守治疗组)。比较各研究组30天主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和全因死亡率。结果:5490例访问我们CPU的患者中有440例计算了改良的心脏风险评分(≥4)。DAMA组101例(22.9%),住院组80例(18.1%),保守组249例(56.5%)。与住院组相比,DAMA组心肌梗死发生率显著升高(2 vs 0;P≤0.001)。DAMA组的MACE和全因死亡率显著高于保守治疗组(5 vs. 2;P = 0.02, 4 vs. 2;P = 0.055)。结论:在本研究中,我们已经证明在COVID-19爆发期间,参考CPU的高修改HEART风险评分患者的DAMA发生率相当高。重要的是,与入院或保守治疗的患者相比,DAMA组经历了更高的30天MACE发生率和全因死亡率。