What is good acute psychiatric care (and how would you know)?

IF 60.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.1002/wps.20958
D. Tracy, Dina M. Phillips
{"title":"What is good acute psychiatric care (and how would you know)?","authors":"D. Tracy, Dina M. Phillips","doi":"10.1002/wps.20958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"truths – truths perhaps accessible only to forms of self-conscious or hyperreflexive awareness unavailable to most of us. In closing, one must acknowledge some gaps in our grasp of subjectivity and its significance for psychiatry. It may be obvious to common sense that the exercise of free will, together with a person’s experience of meaning or significance, do play a role in human behavior and thereby affect the material plane of brain functioning (if I choose to close my eyes, in prayer, patterns in visual cortex are altered). But it is also true that we have difficulty incorporating the domains of conscious life and its physical substrate within a single explanatory account (the mind/body problem). In particular, we have difficulty integrating “act” with “affliction” aspects of psychological existence – that is, appreciating the subtle but decisive ways in which defensive or other goal-directed forms of thought or behavior can interact with aspects of mental life over which the person has little or no control. Even more basic is the challenge of observing and describing consciousness itself, whose ever-changing, all-encompassing flow we, as human beings and language speakers, are constantly tempted to misperceive or misdescribe. We succumb to this temptation by using words that stress the substantive over the transitory aspects of experience, or by focusing on particular objects of awareness while ignoring subtle alterations in, for example, the experience of space, time, or the overall atmosphere of reality. In fact, no approach can be fully “bottom-up” in the sense of being purely empirical or a-theoretical: when it comes to describing experience, patients as well as professionals are burdened (though also blessed) with the objectifying prejudices of their language and their worldview. The study of “lived experience” may then be impossible as a foolproof, quasi-empiricist venture. It is, however, also indispensable – and to both the ethical and the scientific enterprise of psychiatry.","PeriodicalId":49357,"journal":{"name":"World Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":60.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

truths – truths perhaps accessible only to forms of self-conscious or hyperreflexive awareness unavailable to most of us. In closing, one must acknowledge some gaps in our grasp of subjectivity and its significance for psychiatry. It may be obvious to common sense that the exercise of free will, together with a person’s experience of meaning or significance, do play a role in human behavior and thereby affect the material plane of brain functioning (if I choose to close my eyes, in prayer, patterns in visual cortex are altered). But it is also true that we have difficulty incorporating the domains of conscious life and its physical substrate within a single explanatory account (the mind/body problem). In particular, we have difficulty integrating “act” with “affliction” aspects of psychological existence – that is, appreciating the subtle but decisive ways in which defensive or other goal-directed forms of thought or behavior can interact with aspects of mental life over which the person has little or no control. Even more basic is the challenge of observing and describing consciousness itself, whose ever-changing, all-encompassing flow we, as human beings and language speakers, are constantly tempted to misperceive or misdescribe. We succumb to this temptation by using words that stress the substantive over the transitory aspects of experience, or by focusing on particular objects of awareness while ignoring subtle alterations in, for example, the experience of space, time, or the overall atmosphere of reality. In fact, no approach can be fully “bottom-up” in the sense of being purely empirical or a-theoretical: when it comes to describing experience, patients as well as professionals are burdened (though also blessed) with the objectifying prejudices of their language and their worldview. The study of “lived experience” may then be impossible as a foolproof, quasi-empiricist venture. It is, however, also indispensable – and to both the ethical and the scientific enterprise of psychiatry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是好的急性精神病护理(你怎么知道的)?
真相——也许只有我们大多数人无法获得的自我意识或超反射意识才能获得真相。最后,我们必须承认,我们对主观性及其对精神病学的重要性的理解存在一些差距。从常识来看,自由意志的行使,以及一个人对意义或意义的体验,确实在人类行为中发挥作用,从而影响大脑功能的物质层面(如果我选择闭上眼睛,在祈祷时,视觉皮层的模式就会改变)。但是,我们很难将意识生活的领域和它的物理基础整合到一个单一的解释中(心灵/身体问题),这也是事实。特别是,我们很难将“行为”与心理存在的“痛苦”方面结合起来——也就是说,我们很难欣赏那些微妙但决定性的方式,在这些方式中,防御性或其他目标导向的思想或行为形式可以与人们很少或根本无法控制的精神生活方面相互作用。更基本的是观察和描述意识本身的挑战,作为人类和语言使用者,我们总是试图误解或错误描述其不断变化,无所不有的流动。我们屈服于这种诱惑,使用强调经验的实质性方面而不是短暂方面的词语,或者专注于特定的意识对象而忽略了微妙的变化,例如,空间,时间的经验或现实的整体氛围。事实上,没有一种方法是完全“自下而上”的,即纯粹的经验或理论:在描述经验时,患者和专业人士都背负着(尽管也是幸运的)他们的语言和世界观的客观偏见。因此,对“生活经验”的研究可能不可能作为一种万无一失的、准经验主义的冒险。然而,对于精神病学的伦理和科学事业来说,它也是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Psychiatry
World Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
7.40%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: World Psychiatry is the official journal of the World Psychiatric Association. It is published in three issues per year. The journal is sent free of charge to psychiatrists whose names and addresses are provided by WPA member societies and sections. World Psychiatry is also freely accessible on Wiley Online Library and PubMed Central. The main aim of World Psychiatry is to disseminate information on significant clinical, service, and research developments in the mental health field. The journal aims to use a language that can be understood by the majority of mental health professionals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Augmenting trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder with memory specificity training: a randomized controlled trial. Changing approaches to interventions for autistic adults. Dispelling "pleasing myths" about the integration of ecological momentary assessment and intervention into clinical research and practice. Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of WHO psychological interventions in a population of migrants: results from the RESPOND randomized controlled trial. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1