An examination of co-teaching in an online environment

Anusha Pappu, A. Bogaars
{"title":"An examination of co-teaching in an online environment","authors":"Anusha Pappu, A. Bogaars","doi":"10.21100/compass.v15i2.1351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-teaching, employed as a pedagogical tool, is a teaching method commonly used to improve students’ collaborative learning. It can be defined as two or more professionals delivering substantive instruction to a diverse group of students in a single physical space or as blended delivery. Team teaching is an approach to co-teaching, a Business Education method since the 1990s. This case study examines tutor experience and observations of co-teaching on a level 4 specialist transport and logistics module delivered online in 2020-2021. We are the teaching team for the module at the University of Greenwich and worked as two co-tutors. Using a mixed methods approach, we have compared, across a range of parameters, student outcomes for a) co-teaching and b) teaching by a single person. The quantitative measures included attendance, marks awarded and student satisfaction (EvaSys scores) and the black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME)/white module gap; the qualitative measures consisted of tutor observations. Across the quantitative measures, the results are consistent with the suggestion that students may have benefited from being co-taught. Similarly, the qualitative measures indicate greater student engagement with co-teaching than with teaching by one person. We feel that the initial findings from our analysis demonstrate that there is potential for further exploration of the benefits that might be gained from a wider application of team teaching across the Business Faculty.","PeriodicalId":31649,"journal":{"name":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v15i2.1351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-teaching, employed as a pedagogical tool, is a teaching method commonly used to improve students’ collaborative learning. It can be defined as two or more professionals delivering substantive instruction to a diverse group of students in a single physical space or as blended delivery. Team teaching is an approach to co-teaching, a Business Education method since the 1990s. This case study examines tutor experience and observations of co-teaching on a level 4 specialist transport and logistics module delivered online in 2020-2021. We are the teaching team for the module at the University of Greenwich and worked as two co-tutors. Using a mixed methods approach, we have compared, across a range of parameters, student outcomes for a) co-teaching and b) teaching by a single person. The quantitative measures included attendance, marks awarded and student satisfaction (EvaSys scores) and the black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME)/white module gap; the qualitative measures consisted of tutor observations. Across the quantitative measures, the results are consistent with the suggestion that students may have benefited from being co-taught. Similarly, the qualitative measures indicate greater student engagement with co-teaching than with teaching by one person. We feel that the initial findings from our analysis demonstrate that there is potential for further exploration of the benefits that might be gained from a wider application of team teaching across the Business Faculty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络环境下的合作教学研究
合作教学作为一种教学工具,是一种常用的提高学生协作学习能力的教学方法。它可以被定义为两个或更多的专业人员在一个单一的物理空间向不同的学生群体提供实质性的教学,或者是混合教学。团队教学是一种合作教学的方法,是20世纪90年代以来的一种商业教育方法。本案例研究考察了2020-2021年在线交付的四级专业运输和物流模块的导师经验和联合教学的观察。我们是格林威治大学该模块的教学团队,并担任两位共同导师。使用混合方法,我们通过一系列参数比较了a)联合教学和b)单个人教学的学生结果。量化指标包括出勤率、分数和学生满意度(EvaSys分数),以及黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔(BAME)/白人模块的差距;定性测量包括导师观察。通过定量测量,结果与学生可能从合作教学中受益的建议一致。同样,定性测量表明,与一个人的教学相比,学生对合作教学的参与度更高。我们认为,我们分析的初步结果表明,在整个商学院更广泛地应用团队教学,可能会带来更大的好处,我们有可能进一步探索这种好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Regulating the Privately Rented Sector: what can universities offer to support local authority workforce development? Open Scholarship and Decolonisation in Higher Education Exploring humour within the PhD experience: a first-hand reflection The Midterm Wrapper: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of an Effective Performance Intervention (Re)defining learning design: a framework fit for the twenty-first century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1