Personal engagment and prospective acceptability of music-based interventions in counselling psychology practice

Gail Wilson, B. Duncan
{"title":"Personal engagment and prospective acceptability of music-based interventions in counselling psychology practice","authors":"Gail Wilson, B. Duncan","doi":"10.53841/bpscpr.2022.37.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims/objectives:In the United Kingdom, there is a growing movement towards including more arts-based interventions within healthcare systems. This study investigated attitudes of counselling psychologists towards using music therapeutically. The aim was to provide preliminary evidence, and inform future research, on the feasibility of including music as an intervention in counselling psychology practice. It was hypothesised that practitioners who personally engaged with music would be more likely to view interventions using music as acceptable.Methodology:The study utilised quantitative survey methodology to collect data from trainee and qualified counselling psychologists practising in the United Kingdom. Forty-three participants completed the survey, which comprised the Music Use and Background Questionnaire (MUSEBAQ; Chin et al., 2018) to assess personal engagement with music across factors of musicianship, musical capacity and motivations for music use, and an acceptability questionnaire. Data was analysed via multiple linear regression.Findings:Analysis indicated that this sample of counselling psychologists was accepting of the prospect of using music with clients. The personal motivations of participants for using music were found to be a significant positive predictor of acceptance.Discussion/conclusions:Participants who were motivated to use music to improve their own wellbeing were significantly more likely to consider music as an acceptable intervention. If music-based interventions are to become more integrated within counselling psychology practice, leadership of this process and training will be important and it suggested that this bias be accounted for in selection criteria.","PeriodicalId":36758,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2022.37.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims/objectives:In the United Kingdom, there is a growing movement towards including more arts-based interventions within healthcare systems. This study investigated attitudes of counselling psychologists towards using music therapeutically. The aim was to provide preliminary evidence, and inform future research, on the feasibility of including music as an intervention in counselling psychology practice. It was hypothesised that practitioners who personally engaged with music would be more likely to view interventions using music as acceptable.Methodology:The study utilised quantitative survey methodology to collect data from trainee and qualified counselling psychologists practising in the United Kingdom. Forty-three participants completed the survey, which comprised the Music Use and Background Questionnaire (MUSEBAQ; Chin et al., 2018) to assess personal engagement with music across factors of musicianship, musical capacity and motivations for music use, and an acceptability questionnaire. Data was analysed via multiple linear regression.Findings:Analysis indicated that this sample of counselling psychologists was accepting of the prospect of using music with clients. The personal motivations of participants for using music were found to be a significant positive predictor of acceptance.Discussion/conclusions:Participants who were motivated to use music to improve their own wellbeing were significantly more likely to consider music as an acceptable intervention. If music-based interventions are to become more integrated within counselling psychology practice, leadership of this process and training will be important and it suggested that this bias be accounted for in selection criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以音乐为基础的干预在咨询心理学实践中的个人参与和预期可接受性
背景/目的/目标:在英国,越来越多的人倾向于在医疗保健系统中纳入更多基于艺术的干预措施。本研究调查了咨询心理学家对使用音乐治疗的态度。目的是提供初步的证据,并告知未来的研究,包括音乐作为干预咨询心理学实践的可行性。据推测,亲自参与音乐的从业者更有可能认为使用音乐的干预是可以接受的。研究方法:本研究采用定量调查方法收集英国实习和合格咨询心理学家的数据。43名参与者完成了这项调查,其中包括音乐使用和背景问卷(MUSEBAQ;Chin等人,2018)评估个人对音乐的参与,包括音乐素养、音乐能力和音乐使用动机等因素,以及可接受性问卷。数据采用多元线性回归分析。研究结果:分析表明,这些咨询心理学家的样本接受与客户使用音乐的前景。研究发现,参与者使用音乐的个人动机对接受度有显著的正向预测作用。讨论/结论:那些被激励使用音乐来改善自己健康的参与者更有可能将音乐视为一种可接受的干预手段。如果以音乐为基础的干预措施在咨询心理学实践中变得更加整合,这一过程的领导和培训将是重要的,它建议在选择标准中考虑这种偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Review
Counselling Psychology Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental health difficulties in paramedics: A review of the literature Structural Existential Analysis (SEA) – A step-by-step guide for application to research Supervising trainee counselling psychologists of colour in doctoral research: A theoretical review and practice implications ‘You can’t live like I did and grow up normal’: An IPA study of how men diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experienced their early childhood The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on self-efficacy in Assistant Psychologists in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1