Exploring opioid addictions and responsibilities: almost lost in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1108/IJHRH-03-2021-0067
Alan Smith
{"title":"Exploring opioid addictions and responsibilities: almost lost in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Alan Smith","doi":"10.1108/IJHRH-03-2021-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to highlight the overshadowing of the opioid crisis due to Covid-19 pandemic. Opioids are affecting increasing numbers as the current opioid overdose death rate is increasing to 209 per day. While there appears light shining on the end of the Covid-19 pandemic with the advent of a fourth vaccine, there is no such light for the opioid epidemic. Based on a sample of 603 relatively educated adults in NE Ohio, the health harm caused by both crises, prescribing physician blaming, high levels of income loss and physical and emotional burdens shared by the respondents were obvious and striking.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing Bertram et al. (2014) theory of the blame model, the number of results concerning gender and personally involvement of friends and family members, including men empathy increased with greater knowledge of numbers of addicted opioid users in their personal contracts.\n\n\nFindings\nUnfortunately, many women had to remain home taking care of children and elderly loved ones at greater percentages than their male counterparts may account for less empathy as such addicted users have become a burden to economically impaired families. This tendency for placing blame for circumstances with twin crises appears to follow a relatively predictable path as modeled by Bertram et al. (2014) (i.e. denial, justification and excuse).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese are few studies that are studying the amplification effects of the Covid-19 pandemic context on the current opioid crisis.\n","PeriodicalId":14129,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-03-2021-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to highlight the overshadowing of the opioid crisis due to Covid-19 pandemic. Opioids are affecting increasing numbers as the current opioid overdose death rate is increasing to 209 per day. While there appears light shining on the end of the Covid-19 pandemic with the advent of a fourth vaccine, there is no such light for the opioid epidemic. Based on a sample of 603 relatively educated adults in NE Ohio, the health harm caused by both crises, prescribing physician blaming, high levels of income loss and physical and emotional burdens shared by the respondents were obvious and striking. Design/methodology/approach Using Bertram et al. (2014) theory of the blame model, the number of results concerning gender and personally involvement of friends and family members, including men empathy increased with greater knowledge of numbers of addicted opioid users in their personal contracts. Findings Unfortunately, many women had to remain home taking care of children and elderly loved ones at greater percentages than their male counterparts may account for less empathy as such addicted users have become a burden to economically impaired families. This tendency for placing blame for circumstances with twin crises appears to follow a relatively predictable path as modeled by Bertram et al. (2014) (i.e. denial, justification and excuse). Originality/value These are few studies that are studying the amplification effects of the Covid-19 pandemic context on the current opioid crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨阿片类药物成瘾和责任:在Covid-19大流行中几乎迷失
目的本研究的目的是强调由于Covid-19大流行导致的阿片类药物危机的阴影。阿片类药物正在影响越来越多的人,目前阿片类药物过量死亡率正在增加到每天209人。随着第四种疫苗的问世,Covid-19大流行似乎有了结束的曙光,但阿片类药物流行却没有这样的曙光。根据俄亥俄州东北部603名受教育程度相对较高的成年人的样本,这两种危机、处方医生的指责、高水平的收入损失以及受访者共同承担的身体和情感负担对健康造成的危害是明显而惊人的。设计/方法/方法使用Bertram等人(2014)的责备模型理论,随着对个人合同中成瘾阿片类药物使用者数量的更多了解,有关性别和朋友和家庭成员(包括男性共情)个人参与的结果数量增加。不幸的是,与男性相比,许多女性不得不留在家里照顾孩子和年迈的亲人,这可能会减少她们的同情心,因为这些上瘾的用户已经成为经济受损家庭的负担。这种将责任归咎于双重危机的倾向似乎遵循了Bertram等人(2014)的模型(即否认,辩护和借口)的相对可预测的路径。原创性/价值这些是少数研究Covid-19大流行背景下对当前阿片类药物危机的放大效应的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (IJHRH) is an international, peer reviewed journal with a unique practical approach to promoting race equality, inclusion and human rights in health and social care. The journal publishes scholarly and double blind peer-reviewed papers of the highest standard, including case studies and book reviews. IJHRH aims include: -To explore what is currently known about discrimination and disadvantage with a particular focus on health and social care -Push the barriers of the human rights discourse by identifying new avenues for healthcare practice and policy internationally -Create bridges between policymakers, practitioners and researchers -Identify and understand the social determinants of health equity and practical interventions to overcome barriers at national and international levels. The journal welcomes papers which use varied approaches, including discussion of theory, comparative studies, systematic evaluation of interventions, analysis of qualitative data and study of health and social care institutions and the political process. Papers published in IJHRH: -Clearly demonstrate the implications of the research -Provide evidence-rich information -Provoke reflection and support critical analysis of both challenges and strengths -Share examples of best practice and ‘what works’, including user perspectives IJHRH is a hugely valuable source of information for researchers, academics, students, practitioners, managers, policy-makers, commissioning bodies, social workers, psychologists, nurses, voluntary sector workers, service users and carers internationally.
期刊最新文献
The assessment of national conduct in realizing the right to heath: using the framework of United Nations Redirecting to sustainable menstrual products – a holistic approach for improving public health Sandstone mining and silicosis deaths in Rajasthan: a critical legal and policy analysis Midwifery students’ perceptions on ethical rights of women using assisted reproductive technologies Improving healthcare for substance users: the moderating role of psychological flexibility on stigma, mental health, and quality of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1