A deep water and nearshore wave height calibration of the ECOWAVES hindcasting database

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.3856/vol50-issue4-fulltext-2811
Diego Becerra, M. Quezada, Humberto Díaz
{"title":"A deep water and nearshore wave height calibration of the ECOWAVES hindcasting database","authors":"Diego Becerra, M. Quezada, Humberto Díaz","doi":"10.3856/vol50-issue4-fulltext-2811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant wave height (SWH) in shallow waters is assessed by generating two wave hindcasts; the first uses ERA-Interim wind fields and the second one from ERA5 to quantify the improvement of the ERA5 surface winds on the SWH representativeness, both in deep and shallow waters along the Chilean coastline. Additionally, wind field predictions from the Global Forecast System (GFS) were used to assess the representativeness of shallow waters. Oceanographic buoys were used to validate SWH in deep waters, while Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCPs) was equipped to measure waves in shallow waters. Energy spectrums coupling Wavewatch III and Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN) models were transferred to evaluate the performance of shallow water simulations. In general, the SWH from both wave hindcasts showed good performance. Nonetheless, those forced by ERA5 presented a better qualitative comparison of sea state temporal variability, which increased the correlation coefficients (>0.9), coefficients of determination (>0.8), and minor errors (RMSE, MAE, and BIAS) compared to oceanographic buoys and ADCPs. Additionally, in simulations forced by GFS, the temporal variability of the waves in shallow waters was successfully reproduced. Nevertheless, an increase in the RMSE, MAE, and BIAS error was statistically verified compared to ERA-Interim and ERA 5.","PeriodicalId":49917,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3856/vol50-issue4-fulltext-2811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant wave height (SWH) in shallow waters is assessed by generating two wave hindcasts; the first uses ERA-Interim wind fields and the second one from ERA5 to quantify the improvement of the ERA5 surface winds on the SWH representativeness, both in deep and shallow waters along the Chilean coastline. Additionally, wind field predictions from the Global Forecast System (GFS) were used to assess the representativeness of shallow waters. Oceanographic buoys were used to validate SWH in deep waters, while Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCPs) was equipped to measure waves in shallow waters. Energy spectrums coupling Wavewatch III and Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN) models were transferred to evaluate the performance of shallow water simulations. In general, the SWH from both wave hindcasts showed good performance. Nonetheless, those forced by ERA5 presented a better qualitative comparison of sea state temporal variability, which increased the correlation coefficients (>0.9), coefficients of determination (>0.8), and minor errors (RMSE, MAE, and BIAS) compared to oceanographic buoys and ADCPs. Additionally, in simulations forced by GFS, the temporal variability of the waves in shallow waters was successfully reproduced. Nevertheless, an increase in the RMSE, MAE, and BIAS error was statistically verified compared to ERA-Interim and ERA 5.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ECOWAVES后播数据库的深水和近岸波高校准
浅水有效波高(SWH)是通过产生两个波浪后验来评估的;第一个使用ERA-Interim风场,第二个使用ERA5风场,量化了ERA5地面风对智利沿海深水和浅水SWH代表性的改善。此外,利用全球预报系统(GFS)的风场预测来评估浅水的代表性。海洋浮标用于验证深水的SWH,而声学多普勒电流剖面仪(ADCPs)则用于测量浅水区的波浪。利用Wavewatch III和simulation Waves Nearshore (SWAN)模型耦合的能谱来评价浅水模拟的性能。总的来说,两种波浪后验的SWH表现出良好的性能。尽管如此,与海洋浮标和adcp相比,ERA5强迫的海况时间变率具有更好的定性比较,增加了相关系数(>0.9)、决定系数(>0.8)和较小误差(RMSE、MAE和BIAS)。此外,在GFS强迫的模拟中,成功地再现了浅水波浪的时间变化。然而,与ERA- interim和ERA 5相比,RMSE、MAE和BIAS误差的增加得到了统计验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research FISHERIES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research- LAJAR is the continuation of the journal Investigaciones Marinas (1970-2007) and is published since 2008 by the Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Geografía of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. LAJAR is an “Open Access” journal that publishes in English language, original research articles, reviews and short communications on aquatic science, which contain the results of research conducted in aquaculture or in oceanic and coastal marine waters of Latin America. The following topics are considered: Physical Oceanography, Chemical Oceanography, Marine Biogeochemistry, Marine Pollution and Toxicology, Marine Geology and Geophysics, Biological Oceanography, Fisheries and Aquaculture.
期刊最新文献
Bases to inform a genetic line of whiteleg shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei of Mexican origin Evaluation of protein and lipid ingredients through in vitro digestibility for tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) juveniles Experimental transplantation of Durvillaea incurvata in southern Chile: implication for its restocking General health status of a stranded Tursiops truncatus of the oceanic ecotype in southern Gulf of Mexico, Campeche coasts: a multidisciplinary analysis Insights into swordfish (Xiphias gladius) movement patterns and habitat utilization off the coast of northern Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1