Characterization of porosity and pore-size distribution using multiple analytical tools: Implications for carbonate reservoir characterization in geologic storage of CO2

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Environmental Geosciences Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1306/EG.02071716010
C. Medina, M. Mastalerz, J. Rupp
{"title":"Characterization of porosity and pore-size distribution using multiple analytical tools: Implications for carbonate reservoir characterization in geologic storage of CO2","authors":"C. Medina, M. Mastalerz, J. Rupp","doi":"10.1306/EG.02071716010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The successful implementation of geologic carbon sequestration depends on the careful evaluation of the petrophysical characteristics of the storage reservoir. Two petrophysical properties, porosity and permeability, constrain the reservoir in terms of its storage potential and injectivity. These two key parameters may vary significantly in scale within a reservoir. Likewise, the analytical tools that are useful for measuring these properties also vary and only assess pores of a given scale. In this investigation, 52 rock samples that consist of carbonates having a high degree of dolomitization were obtained from the Cambrian–Ordovician Knox Supergroup from different depth intervals; these samples span a significant area of the Midwestern United States. The samples were analyzed for total porosity and pore-size distribution using a variety of techniques, including petrographic image analysis, helium porosimetry, gas adsorption, mercury porosimetry, and ultrasmall-angle/small-angle neutron scattering. Capillary entrapment, or “residual saturation,” is that part of the injected CO 2 that remains trapped in micropores after the pressure elevated by the injection process returns to ambient reservoir pressure. Results from low-pressure nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption and from mercury injection capillary pressure are important in that they provide insights about small pore size that otherwise cannot be resolved by standard helium porosimetry or by image analysis software. Results from these analyses suggest that micro- and mesoporosity control capillary entrapment, whereas macroporosity controls permeability.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.02071716010","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.02071716010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

ABSTRACT The successful implementation of geologic carbon sequestration depends on the careful evaluation of the petrophysical characteristics of the storage reservoir. Two petrophysical properties, porosity and permeability, constrain the reservoir in terms of its storage potential and injectivity. These two key parameters may vary significantly in scale within a reservoir. Likewise, the analytical tools that are useful for measuring these properties also vary and only assess pores of a given scale. In this investigation, 52 rock samples that consist of carbonates having a high degree of dolomitization were obtained from the Cambrian–Ordovician Knox Supergroup from different depth intervals; these samples span a significant area of the Midwestern United States. The samples were analyzed for total porosity and pore-size distribution using a variety of techniques, including petrographic image analysis, helium porosimetry, gas adsorption, mercury porosimetry, and ultrasmall-angle/small-angle neutron scattering. Capillary entrapment, or “residual saturation,” is that part of the injected CO 2 that remains trapped in micropores after the pressure elevated by the injection process returns to ambient reservoir pressure. Results from low-pressure nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption and from mercury injection capillary pressure are important in that they provide insights about small pore size that otherwise cannot be resolved by standard helium porosimetry or by image analysis software. Results from these analyses suggest that micro- and mesoporosity control capillary entrapment, whereas macroporosity controls permeability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多种分析工具表征孔隙度和孔径分布:碳酸盐岩储层表征在二氧化碳地质储存中的意义
地质固碳的成功实施取决于对储层岩石物理特征的仔细评估。孔隙度和渗透率这两种岩石物理性质制约了储层的储集潜力和注入能力。这两个关键参数在油藏中可能会有很大的尺度变化。同样,用于测量这些特性的分析工具也各不相同,并且只能评估给定规模的孔隙。在不同深度层段的寒武—奥陶系诺克斯超群中,获得了52个白云化程度较高的碳酸盐岩岩样;这些样本分布在美国中西部的大片地区。利用岩石图像分析、氦孔隙度法、气体吸附法、汞孔隙度法和超小角/小角中子散射等多种技术分析样品的总孔隙度和孔隙尺寸分布。毛细管夹闭,或“残余饱和度”,是指注入过程中压力升高后仍被困在微孔中的部分二氧化碳。低压氮气和二氧化碳吸附以及注汞毛细管压力的结果很重要,因为它们提供了关于小孔隙大小的见解,否则无法通过标准氦孔隙度测定法或图像分析软件来解决。分析结果表明,微孔和介孔控制毛细圈闭,而大孔控制渗透率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seismic criteria and structural styles for half graben differential inversion: Implication for hydrocarbon accumulation, Abu Sennan blocks, Western Desert, Egypt Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in Devonian shales from the Eastern Gas Shales Project 2 core of the Rome trough, Appalachian Basin, United States The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership petroleum fields database: Compilation, utilization, and support for CCUS activities Presence of hydrocarbons on Mars: A possibility Potential for carbon sequestration in the Hemlock Formation of the Cook Inlet basin, Alaska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1