Testing Pollination Syndromes in Oenothera (Onagraceae)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Pollination Ecology Pub Date : 2021-01-08 DOI:10.26786/1920-7603(2020)609
K. Krakos, Matthew W. Austin
{"title":"Testing Pollination Syndromes in Oenothera (Onagraceae)","authors":"K. Krakos, Matthew W. Austin","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2020)609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pollinators are considered a major selective force in shaping the diversification of angiosperms. It has been hypothesized that convergent evolution of floral form has resulted in “pollination syndromes” - i.e. suites of floral traits that correspond to attraction of particular pollinator functional groups. Across the literature, the pollination syndrome concept has received mixed support. This may be due to studies using different methods to describe floral traits and/or the pollination syndrome concept being supported more often in species highly reliant on pollinators for reproduction. Here, we assess the predictive ability of pollination syndromes in Oenothera, a species rich clade with pollination systems existing on a gradient of specialization, and in which species are either self-compatible or self-incompatible. We ask the following questions: Do Oenothera species follow the pollination syndrome concept using traditional, categorical floral trait descriptions and/or quantitative floral trait measurements? And, are floral traits more predictive of primary pollinators in species with specialized pollination systems and/or species that are self-incompatible? Mapping floral traits of 54 Oenothera species into morphospace, we do not find support for the pollination syndrome concept using either categorical or quantitative floral trait descriptions. We do not find support for specialization or breeding system influencing the prediction of primary pollinators. However, we find pollination syndromes were more predictive in Oenothera species with moth pollination systems. Collectively, these results suggest that the pollination syndrome concept cannot be generally applied across taxa and that evolutionary history is important to consider when evaluating the relationship between floral form and contemporary pollinators. ","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2020)609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Pollinators are considered a major selective force in shaping the diversification of angiosperms. It has been hypothesized that convergent evolution of floral form has resulted in “pollination syndromes” - i.e. suites of floral traits that correspond to attraction of particular pollinator functional groups. Across the literature, the pollination syndrome concept has received mixed support. This may be due to studies using different methods to describe floral traits and/or the pollination syndrome concept being supported more often in species highly reliant on pollinators for reproduction. Here, we assess the predictive ability of pollination syndromes in Oenothera, a species rich clade with pollination systems existing on a gradient of specialization, and in which species are either self-compatible or self-incompatible. We ask the following questions: Do Oenothera species follow the pollination syndrome concept using traditional, categorical floral trait descriptions and/or quantitative floral trait measurements? And, are floral traits more predictive of primary pollinators in species with specialized pollination systems and/or species that are self-incompatible? Mapping floral traits of 54 Oenothera species into morphospace, we do not find support for the pollination syndrome concept using either categorical or quantitative floral trait descriptions. We do not find support for specialization or breeding system influencing the prediction of primary pollinators. However, we find pollination syndromes were more predictive in Oenothera species with moth pollination systems. Collectively, these results suggest that the pollination syndrome concept cannot be generally applied across taxa and that evolutionary history is important to consider when evaluating the relationship between floral form and contemporary pollinators. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠花授粉综合征的检测
传粉者被认为是形成被子植物多样化的主要选择力量。据推测,花形态的趋同进化导致了“传粉综合征”,即与特定传粉者功能群的吸引力相对应的花性状套件。在文献中,传粉综合征的概念得到了不同的支持。这可能是由于研究使用不同的方法来描述花性状和/或传粉综合征的概念在高度依赖传粉者进行繁殖的物种中更经常得到支持。在这里,我们评估了Oenothera传粉综合征的预测能力,Oenothera是一个物种丰富的分支,其传粉系统存在于专业化梯度上,其中物种要么自相容,要么自不相容。我们提出了以下问题:利用传统的、分类的花性状描述和/或定量的花性状测量,是否遵循授粉综合征的概念?并且,在具有专门授粉系统的物种和/或自交不亲和的物种中,花性状是否更能预测主要传粉者?通过将54种酒花属植物的花性状映射到形态空间,我们没有发现用分类或数量的花性状描述来支持授粉综合征的概念。我们没有发现支持专业化或育种系统影响初级传粉者的预测。然而,我们发现传粉综合征在具有飞蛾传粉系统的Oenothera物种中更具预测性。总之,这些结果表明,传粉综合征的概念不能普遍适用于所有分类群,在评估花形态与当代传粉者之间的关系时,进化史是重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pollinator effectiveness and pollination dependency of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in Swedish hemi-boreal forests Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research Species-specific differences in bumblebee worker body size between different elevations: Implications for pollinator community structure under climate change Professor Sue Nicolson 1950-2023: Sweet solutions: pollinators and their physiology Flower-visiting lizards as key ecological actors for an endemic and critically endangered plant in the Canary Islands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1