THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR

S. N. Kartikasari, P. Sari, A. Subagio
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF IMPROVER ADDITION ON SWEET BREAD MADE FROM WHEAT FLOUR","authors":"S. N. Kartikasari, P. Sari, A. Subagio","doi":"10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread.","PeriodicalId":52713,"journal":{"name":"Food ScienTech Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food ScienTech Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v1i1.6193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Modified starch produced in the MOCAF manufacturing process is still not widely used, so further studies are needed regarding the utilization of modified MOCAF-based starch. According to Miyazaki et al., (2006), starch can be used to improve the quality of bread. The raw materials used in the research are ADIRA cassava and cakra flour for sweet bread. The method used RAL with 3 factors, A type of control treatment improver (without addition of improver), addition of improver (native) and improver (modification), treatment B with variations in the amount of treatment added water (480, 510, 540 ml), and treatment C with variations in the concentration of the number of improvers added (0.125, 5 and 1%), each was repeated 3 times. In the application of sweet bread the data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of Variant) test, if the treatment had a significant effect (p <0.05), Duncan's Multiple Range Test would be carried out to see the differences in each treatment given. and continued the Effectiveness test to get the best treatment of bread produced. The lowest density value is 0.17 ± 0.00 (g / cm3) in the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml). The lowest texture was obtained after storage on day 1 of the F3 improver (1% + 540 ml) with a value of 36 ± 6 g / 10mm. Based on the sensory test, the overall breadth appearance score, the color of the inside of the bread, and the aroma, ranged from likes to the value of 4. The F3 improver treatment (1% + 540 ml) has a texture and taste which is preferred with values 4.25 and 4.25 and ease of swallowing with a value of 4.17. The effectiveness value of 0.8 in treatment F3 (1% + 540 ml). The conclusion is that the improver in F3 treatment is best used as an improver on sweet bread.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加改良剂对小麦粉制甜面包的影响
在MOCAF制造过程中产生的变性淀粉还没有得到广泛的应用,因此MOCAF基变性淀粉的利用还需要进一步的研究。根据Miyazaki et al.,(2006),淀粉可以用来改善面包的质量。研究中使用的原料是用于甜面包的ADIRA木薯和蓖麻粉。该方法采用3个因素的RAL, A型对照处理改进剂(不添加改进剂)、添加改进剂(天然)和改进剂(改性),处理B不同处理加水量(480、510、540 ml),处理C不同处理改进剂添加量(0.125、5%和1%),各重复3次。在甜面包的应用中,从研究结果中获得的数据使用方差分析(ANOVA)检验进行分析,如果处理有显著效果(p <0.05),则进行Duncan's Multiple Range test来查看每个处理的差异。并继续进行有效性测试,以获得最佳的面包处理方法。F3改进剂(1% + 540 ml)的最低密度值为0.17±0.00 (g / cm3)。F3改进剂(1% + 540 ml)储存第1天,质地最低,为36±6 g / 10mm。根据感官测试,面包的整体宽度、外观得分、面包内部的颜色和香气,从喜欢到4的值不等。F3改进剂处理(1% + 540 ml)的质地和口感优选,值为4.25和4.25,易于吞咽,值为4.17。治疗F3 (1% + 540 ml)有效值为0.8。结果表明,F3处理下的改良剂最适合作为甜面包的改良剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical Characteristics and Dietary Fiber of Analog Rice from Seaweed (Sargassum sp.) and Beneng Taro Combination Assessment of Unfermented Beverages Intake by Adult Population in Herat City Quality of Gluten Free Bread with the Addition of Xanthan Gum and Different Kneading Methods Physicochemical, Mineral, and Sensory Properties of Masuku (Uapaca kirkiana) Beverages Pigskin Treatment Using Different Food-Grade-Acids: Effects on The Physicochemical Characteristics of The By-Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1